On our AT91SAM9260 board we use the same sdio bus for wifi and for the
sd card slot. This caused the atmel-mci to give the following splat on
the serial console:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 538 at drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c:859 atmci_send_command+0x24/0x44
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 538 Comm: mmcqd/0 Not tainted 4.14.76 #14
Hardware name: Atmel AT91SAM9
[<c000fccc>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c000d3dc>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c000d3dc>] (show_stack) from [<c0017644>] (__warn+0xd8/0xf4)
[<c0017644>] (__warn) from [<c0017704>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24)
[<c0017704>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c033bb9c>] (atmci_send_command+0x24/0x44)
[<c033bb9c>] (atmci_send_command) from [<c033e984>] (atmci_start_request+0x1f4/0x2dc)
[<c033e984>] (atmci_start_request) from [<c033f3b4>] (atmci_request+0xf0/0x164)
[<c033f3b4>] (atmci_request) from [<c0327108>] (mmc_start_request+0x280/0x2d0)
[<c0327108>] (mmc_start_request) from [<c032800c>] (mmc_start_areq+0x230/0x330)
[<c032800c>] (mmc_start_areq) from [<c03366f8>] (mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq+0xc4/0x310)
[<c03366f8>] (mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq) from [<c03372c4>] (mmc_blk_issue_rq+0x118/0x5ac)
[<c03372c4>] (mmc_blk_issue_rq) from [<c033781c>] (mmc_queue_thread+0xc4/0x118)
[<c033781c>] (mmc_queue_thread) from [<c002daf8>] (kthread+0x100/0x118)
[<c002daf8>] (kthread) from [<c000a580>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x34)
---[ end trace 594371ddfa284bd6 ]---
This is:
WARN_ON(host->cmd);
This was fixed on our board by letting atmci_request_end determine what
state we are in. Instead of unconditionally setting it to STATE_IDLE on
STATE_END_REQUEST.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Danielsson <[email protected]>
---
drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
index 0a0ebf3a0..c8a591d8a 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
@@ -1954,13 +1954,14 @@ static void atmci_tasklet_func(unsigned long priv)
}
atmci_request_end(host, host->mrq);
- state = STATE_IDLE;
+ goto unlock; /* atmci_request_end() sets host->state */
break;
}
} while (state != prev_state);
host->state = state;
+unlock:
spin_unlock(&host->lock);
}
--
2.17.2
On 19 October 2018 at 16:40, Jonas Danielsson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On our AT91SAM9260 board we use the same sdio bus for wifi and for the
> sd card slot. This caused the atmel-mci to give the following splat on
> the serial console:
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 538 at drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c:859 atmci_send_command+0x24/0x44
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 0 PID: 538 Comm: mmcqd/0 Not tainted 4.14.76 #14
> Hardware name: Atmel AT91SAM9
> [<c000fccc>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c000d3dc>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
> [<c000d3dc>] (show_stack) from [<c0017644>] (__warn+0xd8/0xf4)
> [<c0017644>] (__warn) from [<c0017704>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24)
> [<c0017704>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c033bb9c>] (atmci_send_command+0x24/0x44)
> [<c033bb9c>] (atmci_send_command) from [<c033e984>] (atmci_start_request+0x1f4/0x2dc)
> [<c033e984>] (atmci_start_request) from [<c033f3b4>] (atmci_request+0xf0/0x164)
> [<c033f3b4>] (atmci_request) from [<c0327108>] (mmc_start_request+0x280/0x2d0)
> [<c0327108>] (mmc_start_request) from [<c032800c>] (mmc_start_areq+0x230/0x330)
> [<c032800c>] (mmc_start_areq) from [<c03366f8>] (mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq+0xc4/0x310)
> [<c03366f8>] (mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq) from [<c03372c4>] (mmc_blk_issue_rq+0x118/0x5ac)
> [<c03372c4>] (mmc_blk_issue_rq) from [<c033781c>] (mmc_queue_thread+0xc4/0x118)
> [<c033781c>] (mmc_queue_thread) from [<c002daf8>] (kthread+0x100/0x118)
> [<c002daf8>] (kthread) from [<c000a580>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x34)
> ---[ end trace 594371ddfa284bd6 ]---
>
> This is:
> WARN_ON(host->cmd);
>
> This was fixed on our board by letting atmci_request_end determine what
> state we are in. Instead of unconditionally setting it to STATE_IDLE on
> STATE_END_REQUEST.
I am sure this change is just papering over much more bigger issues
[1], which are present when using one host for multiple slots.
In either case, as it seems to improve things, I have queued it up for
4.21, thanks!
Kind regards
Uffe
[1]
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg49815.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Danielsson <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
> index 0a0ebf3a0..c8a591d8a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
> @@ -1954,13 +1954,14 @@ static void atmci_tasklet_func(unsigned long priv)
> }
>
> atmci_request_end(host, host->mrq);
> - state = STATE_IDLE;
> + goto unlock; /* atmci_request_end() sets host->state */
> break;
> }
> } while (state != prev_state);
>
> host->state = state;
>
> +unlock:
> spin_unlock(&host->lock);
> }
>
> --
> 2.17.2
>