2021-12-12 17:02:55

by Sam Protsenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] watchdog: s3c2410: Fix getting the optional clock

"watchdog_src" clock is optional and may not be present for some SoCs
supported by this driver. Nevertheless, in case the clock is provided
but some error happens during its getting, that error should be handled
properly. Use devm_clk_get_optional() API for that. Also report possible
errors using dev_err_probe() to handle properly -EPROBE_DEFER error (if
clock provider is not ready by the time WDT probe function is executed).

Fixes: a4f3dc8d5fbc ("watchdog: s3c2410: Support separate source clock")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <[email protected]>
---
drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c
index bb374b9fc163..71c280d3e1a2 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c
@@ -713,16 +713,18 @@ static int s3c2410wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
* "watchdog_src" clock is optional; if it's not present -- just skip it
* and use "watchdog" clock as both bus and source clock.
*/
- wdt->src_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "watchdog_src");
- if (!IS_ERR(wdt->src_clk)) {
- ret = clk_prepare_enable(wdt->src_clk);
- if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(dev, "failed to enable source clock\n");
- ret = PTR_ERR(wdt->src_clk);
- goto err_bus_clk;
- }
- } else {
- wdt->src_clk = NULL;
+ wdt->src_clk = devm_clk_get_optional(dev, "watchdog_src");
+ if (IS_ERR(wdt->src_clk)) {
+ dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(wdt->src_clk),
+ "failed to get source clock\n");
+ ret = PTR_ERR(wdt->src_clk);
+ goto err_bus_clk;
+ }
+
+ ret = clk_prepare_enable(wdt->src_clk);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to enable source clock\n");
+ goto err_bus_clk;
}

wdt->wdt_device.min_timeout = 1;
--
2.30.2



2021-12-12 17:37:37

by Guenter Roeck

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: s3c2410: Fix getting the optional clock

On 12/12/21 9:02 AM, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> "watchdog_src" clock is optional and may not be present for some SoCs
> supported by this driver. Nevertheless, in case the clock is provided
> but some error happens during its getting, that error should be handled
> properly. Use devm_clk_get_optional() API for that. Also report possible
> errors using dev_err_probe() to handle properly -EPROBE_DEFER error (if
> clock provider is not ready by the time WDT probe function is executed).
>
> Fixes: a4f3dc8d5fbc ("watchdog: s3c2410: Support separate source clock")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
> Suggested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>

> ---
> drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c
> index bb374b9fc163..71c280d3e1a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c
> @@ -713,16 +713,18 @@ static int s3c2410wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> * "watchdog_src" clock is optional; if it's not present -- just skip it
> * and use "watchdog" clock as both bus and source clock.
> */
> - wdt->src_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "watchdog_src");
> - if (!IS_ERR(wdt->src_clk)) {
> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(wdt->src_clk);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - dev_err(dev, "failed to enable source clock\n");
> - ret = PTR_ERR(wdt->src_clk);
> - goto err_bus_clk;
> - }
> - } else {
> - wdt->src_clk = NULL;
> + wdt->src_clk = devm_clk_get_optional(dev, "watchdog_src");
> + if (IS_ERR(wdt->src_clk)) {
> + dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(wdt->src_clk),
> + "failed to get source clock\n");
> + ret = PTR_ERR(wdt->src_clk);
> + goto err_bus_clk;
> + }
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(wdt->src_clk);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to enable source clock\n");
> + goto err_bus_clk;
> }
>
> wdt->wdt_device.min_timeout = 1;
>


2021-12-12 17:50:13

by Krzysztof Kozlowski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: s3c2410: Fix getting the optional clock

On 12/12/2021 18:02, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> "watchdog_src" clock is optional and may not be present for some SoCs
> supported by this driver. Nevertheless, in case the clock is provided
> but some error happens during its getting, that error should be handled
> properly. Use devm_clk_get_optional() API for that. Also report possible
> errors using dev_err_probe() to handle properly -EPROBE_DEFER error (if
> clock provider is not ready by the time WDT probe function is executed).
>
> Fixes: a4f3dc8d5fbc ("watchdog: s3c2410: Support separate source clock")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
> Suggested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>


Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>


Best regards,
Krzysztof

2021-12-20 15:28:59

by Sam Protsenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: s3c2410: Fix getting the optional clock

On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 at 19:50, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 12/12/2021 18:02, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> > "watchdog_src" clock is optional and may not be present for some SoCs
> > supported by this driver. Nevertheless, in case the clock is provided
> > but some error happens during its getting, that error should be handled
> > properly. Use devm_clk_get_optional() API for that. Also report possible
> > errors using dev_err_probe() to handle properly -EPROBE_DEFER error (if
> > clock provider is not ready by the time WDT probe function is executed).
> >
> > Fixes: a4f3dc8d5fbc ("watchdog: s3c2410: Support separate source clock")
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
> > Suggested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
>

Hi Guenter,

If there are no outstanding concerns, can you please apply this one?
Would be nice to see it in v5.17 if that's possible.

Thanks!

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

2021-12-20 21:08:18

by Guenter Roeck

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: s3c2410: Fix getting the optional clock

On 12/20/21 7:15 AM, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 at 19:50, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 12/12/2021 18:02, Sam Protsenko wrote:
>>> "watchdog_src" clock is optional and may not be present for some SoCs
>>> supported by this driver. Nevertheless, in case the clock is provided
>>> but some error happens during its getting, that error should be handled
>>> properly. Use devm_clk_get_optional() API for that. Also report possible
>>> errors using dev_err_probe() to handle properly -EPROBE_DEFER error (if
>>> clock provider is not ready by the time WDT probe function is executed).
>>>
>>> Fixes: a4f3dc8d5fbc ("watchdog: s3c2410: Support separate source clock")
>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
>>> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
>>> Suggested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
>>
>
> Hi Guenter,
>
> If there are no outstanding concerns, can you please apply this one?
> Would be nice to see it in v5.17 if that's possible.
>

I added the patch to my watchdog-next tree, but Wim handles all pull
requests.

Thanks,
Guenter



2021-12-21 11:52:47

by Sam Protsenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: s3c2410: Fix getting the optional clock

On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 23:08, Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 12/20/21 7:15 AM, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 at 19:50, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12/12/2021 18:02, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> >>> "watchdog_src" clock is optional and may not be present for some SoCs
> >>> supported by this driver. Nevertheless, in case the clock is provided
> >>> but some error happens during its getting, that error should be handled
> >>> properly. Use devm_clk_get_optional() API for that. Also report possible
> >>> errors using dev_err_probe() to handle properly -EPROBE_DEFER error (if
> >>> clock provider is not ready by the time WDT probe function is executed).
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: a4f3dc8d5fbc ("watchdog: s3c2410: Support separate source clock")
> >>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> >>> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
> >>> Suggested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <[email protected]>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
> >>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
> >>
> >
> > Hi Guenter,
> >
> > If there are no outstanding concerns, can you please apply this one?
> > Would be nice to see it in v5.17 if that's possible.
> >
>
> I added the patch to my watchdog-next tree, but Wim handles all pull
> requests.
>

Thanks, Guenter! Do I need to take any other actions, or Wim is going
to take patches from your tree? I just checked [1] (master branch),
and I can't see my patches there yet.

[1] git://http://www.linux-watchdog.org/linux-watchdog-next.git

> Thanks,
> Guenter
>
>

2021-12-21 15:05:14

by Guenter Roeck

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: s3c2410: Fix getting the optional clock

On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 01:52:32PM +0200, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 23:08, Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> wrote:
[ ... ]
> >
> > I added the patch to my watchdog-next tree, but Wim handles all pull
> > requests.
> >
>
> Thanks, Guenter! Do I need to take any other actions, or Wim is going
> to take patches from your tree? I just checked [1] (master branch),
> and I can't see my patches there yet.
>
> [1] git://http://www.linux-watchdog.org/linux-watchdog-next.git
>
Wim usually takes patches either from my tree or from the list,
but he does so shortly before the commit window opens. You don't
need to do anything else.

Guenter