2023-03-10 22:16:17

by Anjali Kulkarni

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/5] Process connector bug fixes & enhancements

From: Anjali Kulkarni <[email protected]>

In this series, we add filtering to the proc connector module. This
is required to fix some bugs and also will enable the addition of event
based filtering, which will improve performance for anyone interested
in a subset of process events, as compared to the current approach,
which is to send all event notifications.

Thus, a client can register to listen for only exit or fork or a mix or
all of the events. This greatly enhances performance - currently, we
need to listen to all events, and there are 9 different types of events.
For eg. handling 3 types of events - 8K-forks + 8K-exits + 8K-execs takes
200ms, whereas handling 2 types - 8K-forks + 8K-exits takes about 150ms,
and handling just one type - 8K exits takes about 70ms.

Reason why we need the above changes and also a new event type
PROC_EVENT_NONZERO_EXIT, which is only sent by kernel to a listening
application when any process exiting has a non-zero exit status is:

Oracle DB runs on a large scale with 100000s of short lived processes,
starting up and exiting quickly. A process monitoring DB daemon which
tracks and cleans up after processes that have died without a proper exit
needs notifications only when a process died with a non-zero exit code
(which should be rare).

This change will give Oracle DB substantial performance savings - it takes
50ms to scan about 8K PIDs in /proc, about 500ms for 100K PIDs. DB does
this check every 3 secs, so over an hour we save 10secs for 100K PIDs.

Measuring the time using pidfds for monitoring 8K process exits took 4
times longer - 200ms, as compared to 70ms using only exit notifications
of proc connector. Hence, we cannot use pidfd for our use case.

This kind of a new event could also be useful to other applications like
Google's lmkd daemon, which needs a killed process's exit notification.

This patch series is organized as follows -

Patch 1 : Is needed for patches 2 & 3 to work.
Patch 2 : Fixes some bugs in proc connector, details in the patch.
Patch 3 : Test code for proc connector.
Patch 4 : Allow non-root users access to proc connector events.
Patch 5 : Adds event based filtering for performance enhancements.

v->v1 changes:
- Changed commit log in patch 4 as suggested by Christian Brauner
- Changed patch 4 to make more fine grained access to non-root users
- Fixed warning in cn_proc.c,
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
- Fixed some existing warnings in cn_proc.c

Anjali Kulkarni (5):
netlink: Reverse the patch which removed filtering
connector/cn_proc: Add filtering to fix some bugs
connector/cn_proc: Test code for proc connector
connector/cn_proc: Allow non-root users access
connector/cn_proc: Performance improvements

drivers/connector/cn_proc.c | 105 +++++++++--
drivers/connector/connector.c | 12 +-
drivers/w1/w1_netlink.c | 6 +-
include/linux/connector.h | 6 +-
include/linux/netlink.h | 5 +
include/uapi/linux/cn_proc.h | 62 +++++--
net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 48 ++++-
samples/connector/proc_filter.c | 301 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
8 files changed, 499 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 samples/connector/proc_filter.c

--
2.31.1



2023-03-10 22:16:25

by Anjali Kulkarni

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/5] connector/cn_proc: Test code for proc connector

Test code for proc connector.

Signed-off-by: Anjali Kulkarni <[email protected]>
---
samples/connector/proc_filter.c | 262 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 262 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 samples/connector/proc_filter.c

diff --git a/samples/connector/proc_filter.c b/samples/connector/proc_filter.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..25202f5bc126
--- /dev/null
+++ b/samples/connector/proc_filter.c
@@ -0,0 +1,262 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+
+#include <sys/types.h>
+#include <sys/epoll.h>
+#include <sys/socket.h>
+#include <linux/netlink.h>
+#include <linux/connector.h>
+#include <linux/cn_proc.h>
+
+#include <stddef.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <strings.h>
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <signal.h>
+
+#define NL_MESSAGE_SIZE (sizeof(struct nlmsghdr) + sizeof(struct cn_msg) + \
+ sizeof(int))
+
+#define MAX_EVENTS 1
+
+#ifdef ENABLE_PRINTS
+#define Printf printf
+#else
+#define Printf
+#endif
+
+volatile static int interrupted;
+static int nl_sock, ret_errno, tcount;
+static struct epoll_event evn;
+
+int send_message(enum proc_cn_mcast_op mcast_op)
+{
+ char buff[NL_MESSAGE_SIZE];
+ struct nlmsghdr *hdr;
+ struct cn_msg *msg;
+
+ hdr = (struct nlmsghdr *)buff;
+ hdr->nlmsg_len = NL_MESSAGE_SIZE;
+ hdr->nlmsg_type = NLMSG_DONE;
+ hdr->nlmsg_flags = 0;
+ hdr->nlmsg_seq = 0;
+ hdr->nlmsg_pid = getpid();
+
+ msg = (struct cn_msg *)NLMSG_DATA(hdr);
+ msg->id.idx = CN_IDX_PROC;
+ msg->id.val = CN_VAL_PROC;
+ msg->seq = 0;
+ msg->ack = 0;
+ msg->flags = 0;
+
+ msg->len = sizeof(int);
+ *(int *)msg->data = mcast_op;
+
+ if (send(nl_sock, hdr, hdr->nlmsg_len, 0) == -1) {
+ ret_errno = errno;
+ perror("send failed");
+ return -3;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int register_proc_netlink(int *efd, enum proc_cn_mcast_op mcast_op)
+{
+ struct sockaddr_nl sa_nl;
+ int err = 0, epoll_fd;
+
+ nl_sock = socket(PF_NETLINK, SOCK_DGRAM, NETLINK_CONNECTOR);
+
+ if (nl_sock == -1) {
+ ret_errno = errno;
+ perror("socket failed");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ bzero(&sa_nl, sizeof(sa_nl));
+ sa_nl.nl_family = AF_NETLINK;
+ sa_nl.nl_groups = CN_IDX_PROC;
+ sa_nl.nl_pid = getpid();
+
+ if (bind(nl_sock, (struct sockaddr *)&sa_nl, sizeof(sa_nl)) == -1) {
+ ret_errno = errno;
+ perror("bind failed");
+ return -2;
+ }
+
+ epoll_fd = epoll_create1(EPOLL_CLOEXEC);
+ if (epoll_fd < 0) {
+ ret_errno = errno;
+ perror("epoll_create1 failed");
+ return -2;
+ }
+
+ err = send_message(mcast_op);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return err;
+
+ evn.events = EPOLLIN;
+ evn.data.fd = nl_sock;
+ if (epoll_ctl(epoll_fd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nl_sock, &evn) < 0) {
+ ret_errno = errno;
+ perror("epoll_ctl failed");
+ return -3;
+ }
+ *efd = epoll_fd;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void sigint(__attribute__((__always_unused)) int sig)
+{
+ interrupted = 1;
+}
+
+int handle_packet(char *buff, int fd, struct proc_event *event)
+{
+ struct nlmsghdr *hdr;
+
+ hdr = (struct nlmsghdr *)buff;
+
+ if (hdr->nlmsg_type == NLMSG_ERROR) {
+ perror("NLMSG_ERROR error\n");
+ return -3;
+ } else if (hdr->nlmsg_type == NLMSG_DONE) {
+ event = (struct proc_event *)
+ ((struct cn_msg *)NLMSG_DATA(hdr))->data;
+ tcount++;
+ switch (event->what) {
+ case PROC_EVENT_EXIT:
+ Printf("Exit process %d (tgid %d) with code %d, signal %d\n",
+ event->event_data.exit.process_pid,
+ event->event_data.exit.process_tgid,
+ event->event_data.exit.exit_code,
+ event->event_data.exit.exit_signal);
+ break;
+ case PROC_EVENT_FORK:
+ Printf("Fork process %d (tgid %d), parent %d (tgid %d)\n",
+ event->event_data.fork.child_pid,
+ event->event_data.fork.child_tgid,
+ event->event_data.fork.parent_pid,
+ event->event_data.fork.parent_tgid);
+ break;
+ case PROC_EVENT_EXEC:
+ Printf("Exec process %d (tgid %d)\n",
+ event->event_data.exec.process_pid,
+ event->event_data.exec.process_tgid);
+ break;
+ case PROC_EVENT_UID:
+ Printf("UID process %d (tgid %d) uid %d euid %d\n",
+ event->event_data.id.process_pid,
+ event->event_data.id.process_tgid,
+ event->event_data.id.r.ruid,
+ event->event_data.id.e.euid);
+ break;
+ case PROC_EVENT_GID:
+ Printf("GID process %d (tgid %d) gid %d egid %d\n",
+ event->event_data.id.process_pid,
+ event->event_data.id.process_tgid,
+ event->event_data.id.r.rgid,
+ event->event_data.id.e.egid);
+ break;
+ case PROC_EVENT_SID:
+ Printf("SID process %d (tgid %d)\n",
+ event->event_data.sid.process_pid,
+ event->event_data.sid.process_tgid);
+ break;
+ case PROC_EVENT_PTRACE:
+ Printf("Ptrace process %d (tgid %d), Tracer %d (tgid %d)\n",
+ event->event_data.ptrace.process_pid,
+ event->event_data.ptrace.process_tgid,
+ event->event_data.ptrace.tracer_pid,
+ event->event_data.ptrace.tracer_tgid);
+ break;
+ case PROC_EVENT_COMM:
+ Printf("Comm process %d (tgid %d) comm %s\n",
+ event->event_data.comm.process_pid,
+ event->event_data.comm.process_tgid,
+ event->event_data.comm.comm);
+ break;
+ case PROC_EVENT_COREDUMP:
+ Printf("Coredump process %d (tgid %d) parent %d, (tgid %d)\n",
+ event->event_data.coredump.process_pid,
+ event->event_data.coredump.process_tgid,
+ event->event_data.coredump.parent_pid,
+ event->event_data.coredump.parent_tgid);
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int handle_events(int epoll_fd, struct proc_event *pev)
+{
+ char buff[CONNECTOR_MAX_MSG_SIZE];
+ struct epoll_event ev[MAX_EVENTS];
+ int i, event_count = 0, err = 0;
+
+ event_count = epoll_wait(epoll_fd, ev, MAX_EVENTS, -1);
+ if (event_count < 0) {
+ ret_errno = errno;
+ if (ret_errno != EINTR)
+ perror("epoll_wait failed");
+ return -3;
+ }
+ for (i = 0; i < event_count; i++) {
+ if (!(ev[i].events & EPOLLIN))
+ continue;
+ if (recv(ev[i].data.fd, buff, sizeof(buff), 0) == -1) {
+ ret_errno = errno;
+ perror("recv failed");
+ return -3;
+ }
+ err = handle_packet(buff, ev[i].data.fd, pev);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return err;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+ int epoll_fd, err;
+ struct proc_event proc_ev;
+
+ signal(SIGINT, sigint);
+
+ err = register_proc_netlink(&epoll_fd, PROC_CN_MCAST_LISTEN);
+ if (err < 0) {
+ if (err == -2)
+ close(nl_sock);
+ if (err == -3) {
+ close(nl_sock);
+ close(epoll_fd);
+ }
+ exit(1);
+ }
+
+ while (!interrupted) {
+ err = handle_events(epoll_fd, &proc_ev);
+ if (err < 0) {
+ if (ret_errno == EINTR)
+ continue;
+ if (err == -2)
+ close(nl_sock);
+ if (err == -3) {
+ close(nl_sock);
+ close(epoll_fd);
+ }
+ exit(1);
+ }
+ }
+
+ send_message(PROC_CN_MCAST_IGNORE);
+
+ close(epoll_fd);
+ close(nl_sock);
+
+ printf("Done total count: %d\n", tcount);
+ exit(0);
+}
--
2.31.1


2023-03-10 22:16:30

by Anjali Kulkarni

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/5] netlink: Reverse the patch which removed filtering

To use filtering at the connector & cn_proc layers, we need to enable
filtering in the netlink layer. This reverses the patch which removed
netlink filtering:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/commit/?id=549017aa1bb7`

Signed-off-by: Anjali Kulkarni <[email protected]>
---
include/linux/netlink.h | 5 +++++
net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/netlink.h b/include/linux/netlink.h
index c43ac7690eca..866bbc5a4c8d 100644
--- a/include/linux/netlink.h
+++ b/include/linux/netlink.h
@@ -206,6 +206,11 @@ bool netlink_strict_get_check(struct sk_buff *skb);
int netlink_unicast(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb, __u32 portid, int nonblock);
int netlink_broadcast(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb, __u32 portid,
__u32 group, gfp_t allocation);
+int netlink_broadcast_filtered(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb,
+ __u32 portid, __u32 group, gfp_t allocation,
+ int (*filter)(struct sock *dsk,
+ struct sk_buff *skb, void *data),
+ void *filter_data);
int netlink_set_err(struct sock *ssk, __u32 portid, __u32 group, int code);
int netlink_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
int netlink_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
index c64277659753..003c7e6ec9be 100644
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -1432,6 +1432,8 @@ struct netlink_broadcast_data {
int delivered;
gfp_t allocation;
struct sk_buff *skb, *skb2;
+ int (*tx_filter)(struct sock *dsk, struct sk_buff *skb, void *data);
+ void *tx_data;
};

static void do_one_broadcast(struct sock *sk,
@@ -1485,6 +1487,11 @@ static void do_one_broadcast(struct sock *sk,
p->delivery_failure = 1;
goto out;
}
+ if (p->tx_filter && p->tx_filter(sk, p->skb2, p->tx_data)) {
+ kfree_skb(p->skb2);
+ p->skb2 = NULL;
+ goto out;
+ }
if (sk_filter(sk, p->skb2)) {
kfree_skb(p->skb2);
p->skb2 = NULL;
@@ -1507,8 +1514,12 @@ static void do_one_broadcast(struct sock *sk,
sock_put(sk);
}

-int netlink_broadcast(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 portid,
- u32 group, gfp_t allocation)
+int netlink_broadcast_filtered(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb,
+ u32 portid,
+ u32 group, gfp_t allocation,
+ int (*filter)(struct sock *dsk,
+ struct sk_buff *skb, void *data),
+ void *filter_data)
{
struct net *net = sock_net(ssk);
struct netlink_broadcast_data info;
@@ -1527,6 +1538,8 @@ int netlink_broadcast(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 portid,
info.allocation = allocation;
info.skb = skb;
info.skb2 = NULL;
+ info.tx_filter = filter;
+ info.tx_data = filter_data;

/* While we sleep in clone, do not allow to change socket list */

@@ -1552,6 +1565,14 @@ int netlink_broadcast(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 portid,
}
return -ESRCH;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(netlink_broadcast_filtered);
+
+int netlink_broadcast(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 portid,
+ u32 group, gfp_t allocation)
+{
+ return netlink_broadcast_filtered(ssk, skb, portid, group, allocation,
+ NULL, NULL);
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netlink_broadcast);

struct netlink_set_err_data {
--
2.31.1


2023-03-10 22:16:35

by Anjali Kulkarni

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v1 4/5] connector/cn_proc: Allow non-root users access

There were a couple of reasons for not allowing non-root users access
initially - one is there was some point no proper receive buffer
management in place for netlink multicast. But that should be long
fixed. See link below for more context.

Second is that some of the messages may contain data that is root only. But
this should be handled with a finer granularity, which is being done at the
protocol layer. The only problematic protocols are nf_queue and the
firewall netlink. Hence, this restriction for non-root access was relaxed
for NETLINK_ROUTE initially:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

This restriction has also been removed for following protocols:
NETLINK_KOBJECT_UEVENT, NETLINK_AUDIT, NETLINK_SOCK_DIAG,
NETLINK_GENERIC, NETLINK_SELINUX.

Since process connector messages are not sensitive (process fork, exit
notifications etc.), and anyone can read /proc data, we can allow non-root
access here. However, since process event notification is not the only
consumer of NETWORK_CONNECTOR, we can make this change even more
fine grained than the protocol level, by checking for multicast group
within the protocol.

Added a new function netlink_multicast_allowed(), which checks if the
protocol is NETWORK_CONNECTOR, and if multicast group is CN_IDX_PROC
(process event notification) - if so, then allow non-root acceess. For
other multicast groups of NETWORK_CONNECTOR, do not allow non-root
access.

Reason we need this change is we cannot run our DB application as root.

Signed-off-by: Anjali Kulkarni <[email protected]>
---
drivers/connector/cn_proc.c | 7 -------
net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c b/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
index 84f38d2bd4b9..4ff7f8635a6b 100644
--- a/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
+++ b/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
@@ -375,12 +375,6 @@ static void cn_proc_mcast_ctl(struct cn_msg *msg,
!task_is_in_init_pid_ns(current))
return;

- /* Can only change if privileged. */
- if (!__netlink_ns_capable(nsp, &init_user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN)) {
- err = EPERM;
- goto out;
- }
-
if (msg->len == sizeof(mc_op))
mc_op = *((enum proc_cn_mcast_op *)msg->data);
else
@@ -413,7 +407,6 @@ static void cn_proc_mcast_ctl(struct cn_msg *msg,
break;
}

-out:
cn_proc_ack(err, msg->seq, msg->ack);
}

diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
index b311375b8c4c..ae30ec678ad9 100644
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -939,6 +939,16 @@ bool netlink_net_capable(const struct sk_buff *skb, int cap)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netlink_net_capable);

+static inline bool netlink_multicast_allowed(const struct socket *sock,
+ unsigned long groups)
+{
+ if (sock->sk->sk_protocol == NETLINK_CONNECTOR) {
+ if (test_bit(CN_IDX_PROC - 1, &groups))
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
static inline int netlink_allowed(const struct socket *sock, unsigned int flag)
{
return (nl_table[sock->sk->sk_protocol].flags & flag) ||
@@ -1025,7 +1035,8 @@ static int netlink_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
/* Only superuser is allowed to listen multicasts */
if (groups) {
if (!netlink_allowed(sock, NL_CFG_F_NONROOT_RECV))
- return -EPERM;
+ if (!netlink_multicast_allowed(sock, groups))
+ return -EPERM;
err = netlink_realloc_groups(sk);
if (err)
return err;
--
2.31.1


2023-03-10 22:16:39

by Anjali Kulkarni

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v1 5/5] connector/cn_proc: Performance improvements

This patch adds the capability to filter messages sent by the proc
connector on the event type supplied in the message from the client
to the connector. The client can register to listen for an event type
given in struct proc_input.

The event type supplied by client is stored in the client socket's
sk_user_data field, along with the multicast LISTEN or IGNORE message.

cn_filter function checks to see if the event type being notified via
proc connector matches the event type requested by client, before
sending(matches) or dropping(does not match) a packet.

The patch takes care that existing clients using old mechanism of not
sending the event type work without any changes.

We also add a new event PROC_EVENT_NONZERO_EXIT, which is only sent
by kernel to a listening application when any process exiting has a
non-zero exit status.

The proc_filter.c test file is updated to reflect the new filtering.

Signed-off-by: Anjali Kulkarni <[email protected]>
---
drivers/connector/cn_proc.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
include/uapi/linux/cn_proc.h | 19 +++++++++++
samples/connector/proc_filter.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
3 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c b/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
index 4ff7f8635a6b..5dcdf788202b 100644
--- a/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
+++ b/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
@@ -50,21 +50,44 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct local_event, local_event) = {

static int cn_filter(struct sock *dsk, struct sk_buff *skb, void *data)
{
+ uintptr_t val;
+ __u32 what, exit_code, *ptr;
enum proc_cn_mcast_op mc_op;

- if (!dsk)
+ if (!dsk || !data)
return 0;

+ ptr = (__u32 *)data;
+ what = *ptr++;
+ exit_code = *ptr;
+ val = ((struct proc_input *)(dsk->sk_user_data))->event_type;
mc_op = ((struct proc_input *)(dsk->sk_user_data))->mcast_op;

if (mc_op == PROC_CN_MCAST_IGNORE)
return 1;

- return 0;
+ if ((__u32)val == PROC_EVENT_ALL)
+ return 0;
+ /*
+ * Drop packet if we have to report only non-zero exit status
+ * (PROC_EVENT_NONZERO_EXIT) and exit status is 0
+ */
+ if (((__u32)val & PROC_EVENT_NONZERO_EXIT) &&
+ (what == PROC_EVENT_EXIT)) {
+ if (exit_code)
+ return 0;
+ else
+ return 1;
+ }
+ if ((__u32)val & what)
+ return 0;
+ return 1;
}

static inline void send_msg(struct cn_msg *msg)
{
+ __u32 filter_data[2];
+
local_lock(&local_event.lock);

msg->seq = __this_cpu_inc_return(local_event.count) - 1;
@@ -76,8 +99,15 @@ static inline void send_msg(struct cn_msg *msg)
*
* If cn_netlink_send() fails, the data is not sent.
*/
+ filter_data[0] = ((struct proc_event *)msg->data)->what;
+ if (filter_data[0] == PROC_EVENT_EXIT) {
+ filter_data[1] =
+ ((struct proc_event *)msg->data)->event_data.exit.exit_code;
+ } else {
+ filter_data[1] = 0;
+ }
cn_netlink_send_mult(msg, msg->len, 0, CN_IDX_PROC, GFP_NOWAIT,
- cn_filter, NULL);
+ cn_filter, (void *)filter_data);

local_unlock(&local_event.lock);
}
@@ -357,12 +387,15 @@ static void cn_proc_ack(int err, int rcvd_seq, int rcvd_ack)

/**
* cn_proc_mcast_ctl
- * @data: message sent from userspace via the connector
+ * @msg: message sent from userspace via the connector
+ * @nsp: NETLINK_CB of the client's socket buffer
*/
static void cn_proc_mcast_ctl(struct cn_msg *msg,
struct netlink_skb_parms *nsp)
{
enum proc_cn_mcast_op mc_op = 0, prev_mc_op = 0;
+ struct proc_input *pinput = NULL;
+ enum proc_cn_event ev_type = 0;
int err = 0, initial = 0;
struct sock *sk = NULL;

@@ -375,11 +408,21 @@ static void cn_proc_mcast_ctl(struct cn_msg *msg,
!task_is_in_init_pid_ns(current))
return;

- if (msg->len == sizeof(mc_op))
+ if (msg->len == sizeof(*pinput)) {
+ pinput = (struct proc_input *)msg->data;
+ mc_op = pinput->mcast_op;
+ ev_type = pinput->event_type;
+ } else if (msg->len == sizeof(mc_op)) {
mc_op = *((enum proc_cn_mcast_op *)msg->data);
- else
+ ev_type = PROC_EVENT_ALL;
+ } else
return;

+ ev_type = valid_event((enum proc_cn_event)ev_type);
+
+ if (ev_type == PROC_EVENT_NONE)
+ ev_type = PROC_EVENT_ALL;
+
if (nsp->sk) {
sk = nsp->sk;
if (sk->sk_user_data == NULL) {
@@ -390,6 +433,8 @@ static void cn_proc_mcast_ctl(struct cn_msg *msg,
prev_mc_op =
((struct proc_input *)(sk->sk_user_data))->mcast_op;
}
+ ((struct proc_input *)(sk->sk_user_data))->event_type =
+ ev_type;
((struct proc_input *)(sk->sk_user_data))->mcast_op = mc_op;
}

@@ -401,6 +446,8 @@ static void cn_proc_mcast_ctl(struct cn_msg *msg,
case PROC_CN_MCAST_IGNORE:
if (!initial && (prev_mc_op != PROC_CN_MCAST_IGNORE))
atomic_dec(&proc_event_num_listeners);
+ ((struct proc_input *)(sk->sk_user_data))->event_type =
+ PROC_EVENT_NONE;
break;
default:
err = EINVAL;
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/cn_proc.h b/include/uapi/linux/cn_proc.h
index 6a06fb424313..f2afb7cc4926 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/cn_proc.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/cn_proc.h
@@ -30,6 +30,15 @@ enum proc_cn_mcast_op {
PROC_CN_MCAST_IGNORE = 2
};

+#define PROC_EVENT_ALL (PROC_EVENT_FORK | PROC_EVENT_EXEC | PROC_EVENT_UID | \
+ PROC_EVENT_GID | PROC_EVENT_SID | PROC_EVENT_PTRACE | \
+ PROC_EVENT_COMM | PROC_EVENT_NONZERO_EXIT | \
+ PROC_EVENT_COREDUMP | PROC_EVENT_EXIT)
+
+/*
+ * If you add an entry in proc_cn_event, make sure you add it in
+ * PROC_EVENT_ALL above as well.
+ */
enum proc_cn_event {
/* Use successive bits so the enums can be used to record
* sets of events as well
@@ -45,15 +54,25 @@ enum proc_cn_event {
/* "next" should be 0x00000400 */
/* "last" is the last process event: exit,
* while "next to last" is coredumping event
+ * before that is report only if process dies
+ * with non-zero exit status
*/
+ PROC_EVENT_NONZERO_EXIT = 0x20000000,
PROC_EVENT_COREDUMP = 0x40000000,
PROC_EVENT_EXIT = 0x80000000
};

struct proc_input {
enum proc_cn_mcast_op mcast_op;
+ enum proc_cn_event event_type;
};

+static inline enum proc_cn_event valid_event(enum proc_cn_event ev_type)
+{
+ ev_type &= PROC_EVENT_ALL;
+ return ev_type;
+}
+
/*
* From the user's point of view, the process
* ID is the thread group ID and thread ID is the internal
diff --git a/samples/connector/proc_filter.c b/samples/connector/proc_filter.c
index 25202f5bc126..63504fc5f002 100644
--- a/samples/connector/proc_filter.c
+++ b/samples/connector/proc_filter.c
@@ -15,22 +15,33 @@
#include <errno.h>
#include <signal.h>

+#define FILTER
+
+#ifdef FILTER
+#define NL_MESSAGE_SIZE (sizeof(struct nlmsghdr) + sizeof(struct cn_msg) + \
+ sizeof(struct proc_input))
+#else
#define NL_MESSAGE_SIZE (sizeof(struct nlmsghdr) + sizeof(struct cn_msg) + \
sizeof(int))
+#endif

#define MAX_EVENTS 1

+volatile static int interrupted;
+static int nl_sock, ret_errno, tcount;
+static struct epoll_event evn;
+
#ifdef ENABLE_PRINTS
#define Printf printf
#else
#define Printf
#endif

-volatile static int interrupted;
-static int nl_sock, ret_errno, tcount;
-static struct epoll_event evn;
-
+#ifdef FILTER
+int send_message(struct proc_input *pinp)
+#else
int send_message(enum proc_cn_mcast_op mcast_op)
+#endif
{
char buff[NL_MESSAGE_SIZE];
struct nlmsghdr *hdr;
@@ -50,8 +61,14 @@ int send_message(enum proc_cn_mcast_op mcast_op)
msg->ack = 0;
msg->flags = 0;

+#ifdef FILTER
+ msg->len = sizeof(struct proc_input);
+ ((struct proc_input *)msg->data)->mcast_op = pinp->mcast_op;
+ ((struct proc_input *)msg->data)->event_type = pinp->event_type;
+#else
msg->len = sizeof(int);
*(int *)msg->data = mcast_op;
+#endif

if (send(nl_sock, hdr, hdr->nlmsg_len, 0) == -1) {
ret_errno = errno;
@@ -61,7 +78,11 @@ int send_message(enum proc_cn_mcast_op mcast_op)
return 0;
}

+#ifdef FILTER
+int register_proc_netlink(int *efd, struct proc_input *input)
+#else
int register_proc_netlink(int *efd, enum proc_cn_mcast_op mcast_op)
+#endif
{
struct sockaddr_nl sa_nl;
int err = 0, epoll_fd;
@@ -92,7 +113,11 @@ int register_proc_netlink(int *efd, enum proc_cn_mcast_op mcast_op)
return -2;
}

+#ifdef FILTER
+ err = send_message(input);
+#else
err = send_message(mcast_op);
+#endif
if (err < 0)
return err;

@@ -223,10 +248,19 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int epoll_fd, err;
struct proc_event proc_ev;
+#ifdef FILTER
+ struct proc_input input;
+#endif

signal(SIGINT, sigint);

+#ifdef FILTER
+ input.event_type = PROC_EVENT_NONZERO_EXIT;
+ input.mcast_op = PROC_CN_MCAST_LISTEN;
+ err = register_proc_netlink(&epoll_fd, &input);
+#else
err = register_proc_netlink(&epoll_fd, PROC_CN_MCAST_LISTEN);
+#endif
if (err < 0) {
if (err == -2)
close(nl_sock);
@@ -252,7 +286,12 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
}
}

+#ifdef FILTER
+ input.mcast_op = PROC_CN_MCAST_IGNORE;
+ send_message(&input);
+#else
send_message(PROC_CN_MCAST_IGNORE);
+#endif

close(epoll_fd);
close(nl_sock);
--
2.31.1


2023-03-10 22:16:42

by Anjali Kulkarni

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/5] connector/cn_proc: Add filtering to fix some bugs

One bug is if there are more than one listeners for the proc connector
messages, and one of them deregisters for listening using
PROC_CN_MCAST_IGNORE, they will still get all proc connector messages,
as long as there is another listener.

Another issue is if one client calls PROC_CN_MCAST_LISTEN, and another
one calls PROC_CN_MCAST_IGNORE, then both will end up not getting any
messages.

This patch adds filtering and drops packet if client has sent
PROC_CN_MCAST_IGNORE. This data is stored in the client socket's
sk_user_data. In addition, we only increment or decrement
proc_event_num_listeners once per client. This fixes the above issues.

Signed-off-by: Anjali Kulkarni <[email protected]>
---
drivers/connector/cn_proc.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
drivers/connector/connector.c | 12 +++++---
drivers/w1/w1_netlink.c | 6 ++--
include/linux/connector.h | 6 +++-
include/uapi/linux/cn_proc.h | 43 ++++++++++++++++------------
net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 10 +++++--
6 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c b/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
index ccac1c453080..84f38d2bd4b9 100644
--- a/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
+++ b/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
@@ -48,6 +48,21 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct local_event, local_event) = {
.lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(lock),
};

+static int cn_filter(struct sock *dsk, struct sk_buff *skb, void *data)
+{
+ enum proc_cn_mcast_op mc_op;
+
+ if (!dsk)
+ return 0;
+
+ mc_op = ((struct proc_input *)(dsk->sk_user_data))->mcast_op;
+
+ if (mc_op == PROC_CN_MCAST_IGNORE)
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static inline void send_msg(struct cn_msg *msg)
{
local_lock(&local_event.lock);
@@ -61,7 +76,8 @@ static inline void send_msg(struct cn_msg *msg)
*
* If cn_netlink_send() fails, the data is not sent.
*/
- cn_netlink_send(msg, 0, CN_IDX_PROC, GFP_NOWAIT);
+ cn_netlink_send_mult(msg, msg->len, 0, CN_IDX_PROC, GFP_NOWAIT,
+ cn_filter, NULL);

local_unlock(&local_event.lock);
}
@@ -346,11 +362,9 @@ static void cn_proc_ack(int err, int rcvd_seq, int rcvd_ack)
static void cn_proc_mcast_ctl(struct cn_msg *msg,
struct netlink_skb_parms *nsp)
{
- enum proc_cn_mcast_op *mc_op = NULL;
- int err = 0;
-
- if (msg->len != sizeof(*mc_op))
- return;
+ enum proc_cn_mcast_op mc_op = 0, prev_mc_op = 0;
+ int err = 0, initial = 0;
+ struct sock *sk = NULL;

/*
* Events are reported with respect to the initial pid
@@ -367,13 +381,32 @@ static void cn_proc_mcast_ctl(struct cn_msg *msg,
goto out;
}

- mc_op = (enum proc_cn_mcast_op *)msg->data;
- switch (*mc_op) {
+ if (msg->len == sizeof(mc_op))
+ mc_op = *((enum proc_cn_mcast_op *)msg->data);
+ else
+ return;
+
+ if (nsp->sk) {
+ sk = nsp->sk;
+ if (sk->sk_user_data == NULL) {
+ sk->sk_user_data = kzalloc(sizeof(struct proc_input),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ initial = 1;
+ } else {
+ prev_mc_op =
+ ((struct proc_input *)(sk->sk_user_data))->mcast_op;
+ }
+ ((struct proc_input *)(sk->sk_user_data))->mcast_op = mc_op;
+ }
+
+ switch (mc_op) {
case PROC_CN_MCAST_LISTEN:
- atomic_inc(&proc_event_num_listeners);
+ if (initial || (prev_mc_op != PROC_CN_MCAST_LISTEN))
+ atomic_inc(&proc_event_num_listeners);
break;
case PROC_CN_MCAST_IGNORE:
- atomic_dec(&proc_event_num_listeners);
+ if (!initial && (prev_mc_op != PROC_CN_MCAST_IGNORE))
+ atomic_dec(&proc_event_num_listeners);
break;
default:
err = EINVAL;
diff --git a/drivers/connector/connector.c b/drivers/connector/connector.c
index 48ec7ce6ecac..1b7851b1aa0f 100644
--- a/drivers/connector/connector.c
+++ b/drivers/connector/connector.c
@@ -59,7 +59,9 @@ static int cn_already_initialized;
* both, or if both are zero then the group is looked up and sent there.
*/
int cn_netlink_send_mult(struct cn_msg *msg, u16 len, u32 portid, u32 __group,
- gfp_t gfp_mask)
+ gfp_t gfp_mask,
+ int (*filter)(struct sock *dsk, struct sk_buff *skb, void *data),
+ void *filter_data)
{
struct cn_callback_entry *__cbq;
unsigned int size;
@@ -110,8 +112,9 @@ int cn_netlink_send_mult(struct cn_msg *msg, u16 len, u32 portid, u32 __group,
NETLINK_CB(skb).dst_group = group;

if (group)
- return netlink_broadcast(dev->nls, skb, portid, group,
- gfp_mask);
+ return netlink_broadcast_filtered(dev->nls, skb, portid, group,
+ gfp_mask, filter,
+ (void *)filter_data);
return netlink_unicast(dev->nls, skb, portid,
!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp_mask));
}
@@ -121,7 +124,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cn_netlink_send_mult);
int cn_netlink_send(struct cn_msg *msg, u32 portid, u32 __group,
gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
- return cn_netlink_send_mult(msg, msg->len, portid, __group, gfp_mask);
+ return cn_netlink_send_mult(msg, msg->len, portid, __group, gfp_mask,
+ NULL, NULL);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cn_netlink_send);

diff --git a/drivers/w1/w1_netlink.c b/drivers/w1/w1_netlink.c
index db110cc442b1..691978cddab7 100644
--- a/drivers/w1/w1_netlink.c
+++ b/drivers/w1/w1_netlink.c
@@ -65,7 +65,8 @@ static void w1_unref_block(struct w1_cb_block *block)
u16 len = w1_reply_len(block);
if (len) {
cn_netlink_send_mult(block->first_cn, len,
- block->portid, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
+ block->portid, 0,
+ GFP_KERNEL, NULL, NULL);
}
kfree(block);
}
@@ -83,7 +84,8 @@ static void w1_reply_make_space(struct w1_cb_block *block, u16 space)
{
u16 len = w1_reply_len(block);
if (len + space >= block->maxlen) {
- cn_netlink_send_mult(block->first_cn, len, block->portid, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
+ cn_netlink_send_mult(block->first_cn, len, block->portid,
+ 0, GFP_KERNEL, NULL, NULL);
block->first_cn->len = 0;
block->cn = NULL;
block->msg = NULL;
diff --git a/include/linux/connector.h b/include/linux/connector.h
index 487350bb19c3..1336a5e7dd2f 100644
--- a/include/linux/connector.h
+++ b/include/linux/connector.h
@@ -96,7 +96,11 @@ void cn_del_callback(const struct cb_id *id);
*
* If there are no listeners for given group %-ESRCH can be returned.
*/
-int cn_netlink_send_mult(struct cn_msg *msg, u16 len, u32 portid, u32 group, gfp_t gfp_mask);
+int cn_netlink_send_mult(struct cn_msg *msg, u16 len, u32 portid,
+ u32 group, gfp_t gfp_mask,
+ int (*filter)(struct sock *dsk, struct sk_buff *skb,
+ void *data),
+ void *filter_data);

/**
* cn_netlink_send - Sends message to the specified groups.
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/cn_proc.h b/include/uapi/linux/cn_proc.h
index db210625cee8..6a06fb424313 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/cn_proc.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/cn_proc.h
@@ -30,6 +30,30 @@ enum proc_cn_mcast_op {
PROC_CN_MCAST_IGNORE = 2
};

+enum proc_cn_event {
+ /* Use successive bits so the enums can be used to record
+ * sets of events as well
+ */
+ PROC_EVENT_NONE = 0x00000000,
+ PROC_EVENT_FORK = 0x00000001,
+ PROC_EVENT_EXEC = 0x00000002,
+ PROC_EVENT_UID = 0x00000004,
+ PROC_EVENT_GID = 0x00000040,
+ PROC_EVENT_SID = 0x00000080,
+ PROC_EVENT_PTRACE = 0x00000100,
+ PROC_EVENT_COMM = 0x00000200,
+ /* "next" should be 0x00000400 */
+ /* "last" is the last process event: exit,
+ * while "next to last" is coredumping event
+ */
+ PROC_EVENT_COREDUMP = 0x40000000,
+ PROC_EVENT_EXIT = 0x80000000
+};
+
+struct proc_input {
+ enum proc_cn_mcast_op mcast_op;
+};
+
/*
* From the user's point of view, the process
* ID is the thread group ID and thread ID is the internal
@@ -44,24 +68,7 @@ enum proc_cn_mcast_op {
*/

struct proc_event {
- enum what {
- /* Use successive bits so the enums can be used to record
- * sets of events as well
- */
- PROC_EVENT_NONE = 0x00000000,
- PROC_EVENT_FORK = 0x00000001,
- PROC_EVENT_EXEC = 0x00000002,
- PROC_EVENT_UID = 0x00000004,
- PROC_EVENT_GID = 0x00000040,
- PROC_EVENT_SID = 0x00000080,
- PROC_EVENT_PTRACE = 0x00000100,
- PROC_EVENT_COMM = 0x00000200,
- /* "next" should be 0x00000400 */
- /* "last" is the last process event: exit,
- * while "next to last" is coredumping event */
- PROC_EVENT_COREDUMP = 0x40000000,
- PROC_EVENT_EXIT = 0x80000000
- } what;
+ enum proc_cn_event what;
__u32 cpu;
__u64 __attribute__((aligned(8))) timestamp_ns;
/* Number of nano seconds since system boot */
diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
index 003c7e6ec9be..b311375b8c4c 100644
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@
#include <linux/net_namespace.h>
#include <linux/nospec.h>
#include <linux/btf_ids.h>
+#include <linux/connector.h>

#include <net/net_namespace.h>
#include <net/netns/generic.h>
@@ -767,9 +768,14 @@ static int netlink_release(struct socket *sock)
/* must not acquire netlink_table_lock in any way again before unbind
* and notifying genetlink is done as otherwise it might deadlock
*/
- if (nlk->netlink_unbind) {
+ if (nlk->netlink_unbind && nlk->groups) {
int i;
-
+ if (sk->sk_protocol == NETLINK_CONNECTOR) {
+ if (test_bit(CN_IDX_PROC - 1, nlk->groups)) {
+ kfree(sk->sk_user_data);
+ sk->sk_user_data = NULL;
+ }
+ }
for (i = 0; i < nlk->ngroups; i++)
if (test_bit(i, nlk->groups))
nlk->netlink_unbind(sock_net(sk), i + 1);
--
2.31.1


2023-03-14 00:24:56

by Jakub Kicinski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] connector/cn_proc: Add filtering to fix some bugs

On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 14:15:44 -0800 Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/connector.h b/include/linux/connector.h
> index 487350bb19c3..1336a5e7dd2f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/connector.h
> +++ b/include/linux/connector.h
> @@ -96,7 +96,11 @@ void cn_del_callback(const struct cb_id *id);
> *
> * If there are no listeners for given group %-ESRCH can be returned.
> */
> -int cn_netlink_send_mult(struct cn_msg *msg, u16 len, u32 portid, u32 group, gfp_t gfp_mask);
> +int cn_netlink_send_mult(struct cn_msg *msg, u16 len, u32 portid,
> + u32 group, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> + int (*filter)(struct sock *dsk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> + void *data),
> + void *filter_data);

kdoc needs to be extended

> diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> index 003c7e6ec9be..b311375b8c4c 100644
> --- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> +++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@
> #include <linux/net_namespace.h>
> #include <linux/nospec.h>
> #include <linux/btf_ids.h>
> +#include <linux/connector.h>
>
> #include <net/net_namespace.h>
> #include <net/netns/generic.h>
> @@ -767,9 +768,14 @@ static int netlink_release(struct socket *sock)
> /* must not acquire netlink_table_lock in any way again before unbind
> * and notifying genetlink is done as otherwise it might deadlock
> */
> - if (nlk->netlink_unbind) {
> + if (nlk->netlink_unbind && nlk->groups) {
> int i;
> -
> + if (sk->sk_protocol == NETLINK_CONNECTOR) {
> + if (test_bit(CN_IDX_PROC - 1, nlk->groups)) {
> + kfree(sk->sk_user_data);
> + sk->sk_user_data = NULL;
> + }
> + }
> for (i = 0; i < nlk->ngroups; i++)
> if (test_bit(i, nlk->groups))
> nlk->netlink_unbind(sock_net(sk), i + 1);

This is clearly a layering violation, right?
Please don't add "if (family_x)" to the core netlink code.

2023-03-14 02:32:41

by Anjali Kulkarni

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] connector/cn_proc: Add filtering to fix some bugs


> -int cn_netlink_send_mult(struct cn_msg *msg, u16 len, u32 portid, u32 group, gfp_t gfp_mask);
> +int cn_netlink_send_mult(struct cn_msg *msg, u16 len, u32 portid,
> +????????????????????? u32 group, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> +????????????????????? int (*filter)(struct sock *dsk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> +??????????????????????????????????? void *data),
> +????????????????????? void *filter_data);

kdoc needs to be extended
ANJALI> Thanks, will update in next revision.

> -
> +???????????? if (sk->sk_protocol == NETLINK_CONNECTOR) {
> +???????????????????? if (test_bit(CN_IDX_PROC - 1, nlk->groups)) {
> +???????????????????????????? kfree(sk->sk_user_data);
> +???????????????????????????? sk->sk_user_data = NULL;
> +???????????????????? }
> +???????????? }
>??????????????? for (i = 0; i < nlk->ngroups; i++)
>??????????????????????? if (test_bit(i, nlk->groups))
>??????????????????????????????? nlk->netlink_unbind(sock_net(sk), i + 1);

This is clearly a layering violation, right?
Please don't add "if (family_x)" to the core netlink code.
ANJALI> Yes, it is, but there does not seem a very clean way to do it otherwise and I saw a check for protocol NETLINK_GENERIC just below it, so used it for connector as well. There is no release or free callback in the netlink_sock. Is it ok to add it? There was another bug (for which I have not yet sent a patch) in which, we need to decrement proc_event_num_listeners, when client exits without calling IGNORE, else that count again gets out of status of actual no of listeners.
The other option is to add a flag in netlink_sock, something like NETLINK_F_SK_USER_DATA_FREE, which will free the sk_user_data, if this flag is set. But it does not solve the above scenario.
.

2023-03-14 08:40:08

by Christian Brauner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] connector/cn_proc: Add filtering to fix some bugs

On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 05:24:41PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 14:15:44 -0800 Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/connector.h b/include/linux/connector.h
> > index 487350bb19c3..1336a5e7dd2f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/connector.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/connector.h
> > @@ -96,7 +96,11 @@ void cn_del_callback(const struct cb_id *id);
> > *
> > * If there are no listeners for given group %-ESRCH can be returned.
> > */
> > -int cn_netlink_send_mult(struct cn_msg *msg, u16 len, u32 portid, u32 group, gfp_t gfp_mask);
> > +int cn_netlink_send_mult(struct cn_msg *msg, u16 len, u32 portid,
> > + u32 group, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > + int (*filter)(struct sock *dsk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> > + void *data),
> > + void *filter_data);
>
> kdoc needs to be extended

just a thought from my side. I think giving access to unprivileged users
will require a little thought as that's potentially sensitive.

If possible I would think that the patches that don't lead to a
behavioral change should go in completely independently and then we can
discuss the non-root access change.

2023-03-14 18:52:07

by Anjali Kulkarni

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] connector/cn_proc: Add filtering to fix some bugs



________________________________________
From: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 1:38 AM
To: Jakub Kicinski
Cc: Anjali Kulkarni; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] connector/cn_proc: Add filtering to fix some bugs

On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 05:24:41PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 14:15:44 -0800 Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/connector.h b/include/linux/connector.h
> > index 487350bb19c3..1336a5e7dd2f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/connector.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/connector.h
> > @@ -96,7 +96,11 @@ void cn_del_callback(const struct cb_id *id);
> > *
> > * If there are no listeners for given group %-ESRCH can be returned.
> > */
> > -int cn_netlink_send_mult(struct cn_msg *msg, u16 len, u32 portid, u32 group, gfp_t gfp_mask);
> > +int cn_netlink_send_mult(struct cn_msg *msg, u16 len, u32 portid,
> > + u32 group, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > + int (*filter)(struct sock *dsk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> > + void *data),
> > + void *filter_data);
>
> kdoc needs to be extended

just a thought from my side. I think giving access to unprivileged users
will require a little thought as that's potentially sensitive.

If possible I would think that the patches that don't lead to a
behavioral change should go in completely independently and then we can
discuss the non-root access change.
ANJALI> That sounds fine. I can send the non-root change as the last patch
in the series. I can also add a change to allow the sensitive content only if
the user ID or parent ID matches etc. I know the exit status needs more
discussion..

2023-03-15 04:59:55

by Jakub Kicinski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] connector/cn_proc: Add filtering to fix some bugs

On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 02:32:13 +0000 Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
> This is clearly a layering violation, right?
> Please don't add "if (family_x)" to the core netlink code.
>
> ANJALI> Yes, it is, but there does not seem a very clean way to do it
> ANJALI> otherwise and I saw a check for protocol NETLINK_GENERIC just
> ANJALI> below it, so used it for connector as well. There is no
> ANJALI> release or free callback in the netlink_sock. Is it ok to add
> ANJALI> it? There was another bug (for which I have not yet sent a
> ANJALI> patch) in which, we need to decrement
> ANJALI> proc_event_num_listeners, when client exits without calling
> ANJALI> IGNORE, else that count again gets out of status of actual no
> ANJALI> of listeners.
> The other option is to add a flag in netlink_sock, something like
> NETLINK_F_SK_USER_DATA_FREE, which will free the sk_user_data, if
> this flag is set. But it does not solve the above scenario.

Please fix your email setup, it's really hard to read your replies.

There is an unbind callback, and a notifier. Can neither of those
be made to work? ->sk_user_data is not a great choice of a field,
either, does any other netlink family use it this way?
Adding a new field for family use to struct netlink_sock may be better.

2023-03-15 19:09:02

by Anjali Kulkarni

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] connector/cn_proc: Add filtering to fix some bugs



> On Mar 14, 2023, at 9:59 PM, Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 02:32:13 +0000 Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
>> This is clearly a layering violation, right?
>> Please don't add "if (family_x)" to the core netlink code.
>>
>> ANJALI> Yes, it is, but there does not seem a very clean way to do it
>> ANJALI> otherwise and I saw a check for protocol NETLINK_GENERIC just
>> ANJALI> below it, so used it for connector as well. There is no
>> ANJALI> release or free callback in the netlink_sock. Is it ok to add
>> ANJALI> it? There was another bug (for which I have not yet sent a
>> ANJALI> patch) in which, we need to decrement
>> ANJALI> proc_event_num_listeners, when client exits without calling
>> ANJALI> IGNORE, else that count again gets out of status of actual no
>> ANJALI> of listeners.
>> The other option is to add a flag in netlink_sock, something like
>> NETLINK_F_SK_USER_DATA_FREE, which will free the sk_user_data, if
>> this flag is set. But it does not solve the above scenario.
>
> Please fix your email setup, it's really hard to read your replies.
>

I have changed my email client, let me know if this does not fix the issue you see.

> There is an unbind callback, and a notifier. Can neither of those
> be made to work? ->sk_user_data is not a great choice of a field,
> either, does any other netlink family use it this way?
> Adding a new field for family use to struct netlink_sock may be better.

The unbind call will not work because it is for the case of adding and deleting group memberships and hence called from netlink_setsockopt() when NETLINK_DROP_MEMBERSHIP option is given. We would not be able to distinguish between the drop membership & release cases.
The notifier call seems to be for blocked clients? Am not sure if the we need to block/wait on this call to be notified to free/release. Also, the API does not pass in struct sock to free what we want, so we will need to change that everywhere it is currently used.
As for using sk_user_data - this field seems to be used by different applications in different ways depending on how they need to use data. If we use a new field in netlink_sock, we would need to add a new API function to allocate this member, similar to release, because it seems you cannot access netlink_sock outside of af_netlink, or at least I do not see any current access to it, and functions like nlk_sk are static. Also, if we add an allocation function, we won’t know the first time the client sends it’s data (we need to know “initial” in the patches), so we will need to add a new field in the socket to indicate first access or add a lot more infrastructure in cn_proc to store each client’s information.

Anjali

2023-03-15 19:14:09

by Anjali Kulkarni

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] connector/cn_proc: Add filtering to fix some bugs

access netlink_sock outside of af_netlink, or at least I do not see any current access to it, and functions like nlk_sk are static. Also, if we add an allocation function, we won’t know the first time the client sends it’s data (we need to know “initial” in the patches), so we will need to add a new field in the socket to indicate first access or add a lot more infrastructure in cn_proc to store each client’s information.

ANJALI> My mistake above - I guess we could store it as a new sub-field in the new netlink_sock structure.

2023-03-15 19:50:14

by Jakub Kicinski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] connector/cn_proc: Add filtering to fix some bugs

On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 19:08:34 +0000 Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
> > On Mar 14, 2023, at 9:59 PM, Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 02:32:13 +0000 Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
> >> This is clearly a layering violation, right?
> >> Please don't add "if (family_x)" to the core netlink code.
> >> The other option is to add a flag in netlink_sock, something like
> >> NETLINK_F_SK_USER_DATA_FREE, which will free the sk_user_data, if
> >> this flag is set. But it does not solve the above scenario.
> >
> > Please fix your email setup, it's really hard to read your replies.
> >
>
> I have changed my email client, let me know if this does not fix the issue you see.

Quite a bit better, thanks!

> > There is an unbind callback, and a notifier. Can neither of those
> > be made to work? ->sk_user_data is not a great choice of a field,
> > either, does any other netlink family use it this way?
> > Adding a new field for family use to struct netlink_sock may be better.
>
> The unbind call will not work because it is for the case of adding and deleting group memberships and hence called from netlink_setsockopt() when NETLINK_DROP_MEMBERSHIP option is given. We would not be able to distinguish between the drop membership & release cases.
> The notifier call seems to be for blocked clients? Am not sure if the we need to block/wait on this call to be notified to free/release. Also, the API does not pass in struct sock to free what we want, so we will need to change that everywhere it is currently used.

I think that adding the new release callback is acceptable.
I haven't seen your v2 before replying.

> As for using sk_user_data - this field seems to be used by different applications in different ways depending on how they need to use data. If we use a new field in netlink_sock, we would need to add a new API function to allocate this member, similar to release, because it seems you cannot access netlink_sock outside of af_netlink, or at least I do not see any current access to it, and functions like nlk_sk are static. Also, if we add an allocation function, we won’t know the first time the client sends it’s data (we need to know “initial” in the patches), so we will need to add a new field in the socket to indicate first access or add a lot more infrastructure in cn_proc to store each client’s information.

Alright, I guess we can risk the sk_user_data, and see if anything
explodes. Normally higher protocol wraps the socket structure in its
own structure and the sk_user_data pointer is for an in-kernel user
of the socket (i.e. in kernel client). But "classic netlink" is all
legacy code (new subsystem use the generic netlink overlay) so trying
to decode now why things are the way they are and fixing the structure
would be a major effort :(

2023-03-15 20:12:32

by Anjali Kulkarni

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] connector/cn_proc: Add filtering to fix some bugs


>>
>> The unbind call will not work because it is for the case of adding and deleting group memberships and hence called from netlink_setsockopt() when NETLINK_DROP_MEMBERSHIP option is given. We would not be able to distinguish between the drop membership & release cases.
>> The notifier call seems to be for blocked clients? Am not sure if the we need to block/wait on this call to be notified to free/release. Also, the API does not pass in struct sock to free what we want, so we will need to change that everywhere it is currently used.
>
> I think that adding the new release callback is acceptable.
> I haven't seen your v2 before replying.

Thanks, so I will wait for your comments on v2 before sending updated patch.

>
>> As for using sk_user_data - this field seems to be used by different applications in different ways depending on how they need to use data. If we use a new field in netlink_sock, we would need to add a new API function to allocate this member, similar to release, because it seems you cannot access netlink_sock outside of af_netlink, or at least I do not see any current access to it, and functions like nlk_sk are static. Also, if we add an allocation function, we won’t know the first time the client sends it’s data (we need to know “initial” in the patches), so we will need to add a new field in the socket to indicate first access or add a lot more infrastructure in cn_proc to store each client’s information.
>
> Alright, I guess we can risk the sk_user_data, and see if anything
> explodes. Normally higher protocol wraps the socket structure in its
> own structure and the sk_user_data pointer is for an in-kernel user
> of the socket (i.e. in kernel client). But "classic netlink" is all
> legacy code (new subsystem use the generic netlink overlay) so trying
> to decode now why things are the way they are and fixing the structure
> would be a major effort :(

Ok, thanks!

2023-04-01 18:59:20

by Anjali Kulkarni

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] connector/cn_proc: Add filtering to fix some bugs



> On Mar 14, 2023, at 1:38 AM, Christian Brauner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 05:24:41PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 14:15:44 -0800 Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/connector.h b/include/linux/connector.h
>>> index 487350bb19c3..1336a5e7dd2f 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/connector.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/connector.h
>>> @@ -96,7 +96,11 @@ void cn_del_callback(const struct cb_id *id);
>>> *
>>> * If there are no listeners for given group %-ESRCH can be returned.
>>> */
>>> -int cn_netlink_send_mult(struct cn_msg *msg, u16 len, u32 portid, u32 group, gfp_t gfp_mask);
>>> +int cn_netlink_send_mult(struct cn_msg *msg, u16 len, u32 portid,
>>> + u32 group, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>>> + int (*filter)(struct sock *dsk, struct sk_buff *skb,
>>> + void *data),
>>> + void *filter_data);
>>
>> kdoc needs to be extended
>
> just a thought from my side. I think giving access to unprivileged users
> will require a little thought as that's potentially sensitive.
>
> If possible I would think that the patches that don't lead to a
> behavioral change should go in completely independently and then we can
> discuss the non-root access change.

Hi Christian,

Could you take a look at v4 and let me know your thoughts, so we can start a discussion on that thread? Do we need more filtering based on user ID /other parameters for exit status? Can we allow just non-zero notification (not the exact exit status but just whether it was a 0 or a non-zero exit) be available to non-root users?

Do other folks have any more comments/suggestions?

Thanks
Anjali