Any comments would be appreciated.
Description: Use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout()
to guarantee the task delays as expected.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Attems <[email protected]>
---
linux-2.6.10-rc2-bk4-max/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c | 6 ++----
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -puN drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c~msleep-drivers_mtd_chips_cfi_cmdset_0002 drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
--- linux-2.6.10-rc2-bk4/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c~msleep-drivers_mtd_chips_cfi_cmdset_0002 2004-11-19 17:15:36.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.10-rc2-bk4-max/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c 2004-11-19 17:15:36.000000000 +0100
@@ -1173,8 +1173,7 @@ static inline int do_erase_chip(struct m
chip->in_progress_block_addr = adr;
cfi_spin_unlock(chip->mutex);
- set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
- schedule_timeout((chip->erase_time*HZ)/(2*1000));
+ msleep(chip->erase_time/2);
cfi_spin_lock(chip->mutex);
timeo = jiffies + (HZ*20);
@@ -1259,8 +1258,7 @@ static inline int do_erase_oneblock(stru
chip->in_progress_block_addr = adr;
cfi_spin_unlock(chip->mutex);
- set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
- schedule_timeout((chip->erase_time*HZ)/(2*1000));
+ msleep(chip->erase_time/2);
cfi_spin_lock(chip->mutex);
timeo = jiffies + (HZ*20);
_