Hi Christoph,
I'm puzzled why I who only pretend to have NUMA get this compiler warning
kernel/sysctl.c:881: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
but people who really have NUMA don't. Specifying the address of an int
instead of a function looks unhealthy to me: could you please test this
plausible but possibly nonsense patch below, correct it where necessary,
and send it in? Thanks.
Heed NUMA VM_ZONE_RECLAIM_MODE compiler warning in kernel/sysctl.c.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
--- 2.6.16-rc1-git4/kernel/sysctl.c 2006-01-22 09:22:41.000000000 +0000
+++ linux/kernel/sysctl.c 2006-01-23 13:25:22.000000000 +0000
@@ -878,7 +878,8 @@ static ctl_table vm_table[] = {
.maxlen = sizeof(zone_reclaim_mode),
.mode = 0644,
.proc_handler = &proc_dointvec,
- .strategy = &zero,
+ .strategy = &sysctl_intvec,
+ .extra1 = &zero,
},
#endif
{ .ctl_name = 0 }
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> Heed NUMA VM_ZONE_RECLAIM_MODE compiler warning in kernel/sysctl.c.
This is already fixed in Andrews tree.