2007-05-01 15:58:59

by Pierre Ossman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/36] Use menuconfig objects II - MMC

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> Change Kconfig objects from "menu, config" into "menuconfig" so
> that the user can disable the whole feature without having to
> enter the menu first.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
>

As promised, an updated patch.


--
-- Pierre Ossman

Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org
PulseAudio, core developer http://pulseaudio.org
rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org


Attachments:
menuconfig.patch (4.16 kB)

2007-05-01 20:39:09

by Jan Engelhardt

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/36] Use menuconfig objects II - MMC


On May 1 2007 17:57, Pierre Ossman wrote:
>Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> Change Kconfig objects from "menu, config" into "menuconfig" so
>> that the user can disable the whole feature without having to
>> enter the menu first.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
>
>As promised, an updated patch.

If it works, no problem. just put your sign-off somewhere
and let Andrew (or the appropriate subsys maintainer) have it :)



Jan
--

2007-05-02 05:20:49

by Pierre Ossman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/36] Use menuconfig objects II - MMC

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> If it works, no problem. just put your sign-off somewhere
> and let Andrew (or the appropriate subsys maintainer) have it :)
>

Well, the appropriate subsys maintainer would be me. :)

Has it been decided that this is the way to go? I have no strong feelings either
way.

Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman

Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org
PulseAudio, core developer http://pulseaudio.org
rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org

2007-05-02 17:48:49

by Jan Engelhardt

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/36] Use menuconfig objects II - MMC


On May 2 2007 07:19, Pierre Ossman wrote:
>Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>
>> If it works, no problem. just put your sign-off somewhere
>> and let Andrew (or the appropriate subsys maintainer) have it :)
>>
>
>Well, the appropriate subsys maintainer would be me. :)
>
>Has it been decided that this is the way to go? I have no strong
>feelings either way.

Who is to decide this? I have not seen any strong objections yet, either
yes-please or I-don't-mind, so it looks kinda ok. Just act innocent. If
it bugs someone, there's always the signed-off list, which will blame me :)



Jan
--