2011-06-01 17:10:26

by Julia Lawall

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 4/10] drivers/net/can/flexcan.c: add missing clk_put

From: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>

The failed_get label is used after the call to clk_get has succeeded, so it
should be moved up above the call to clk_put.

A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@r exists@
expression e1,e2;
statement S;
@@

e1 = clk_get@p1(...);
... when != e1 = e2
when != clk_put(e1)
when any
if (...) { ... when != clk_put(e1)
when != if (...) { ... clk_put(e1) ... }
* return@p3 ...;
} else S
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>

---
drivers/net/can/flexcan.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
index d499056..121739c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
@@ -978,8 +978,8 @@ static int __devinit flexcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
failed_map:
release_mem_region(mem->start, mem_size);
failed_req:
- clk_put(clk);
failed_get:
+ clk_put(clk);
failed_clock:
return err;
}


2011-06-01 17:28:52

by Joe Perches

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/10] drivers/net/can/flexcan.c: add missing clk_put

On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 19:10 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> The failed_get label is used after the call to clk_get has succeeded, so it
> should be moved up above the call to clk_put.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
[]
> @@ -978,8 +978,8 @@ static int __devinit flexcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> failed_map:
> release_mem_region(mem->start, mem_size);
> failed_req:
> - clk_put(clk);
> failed_get:
> + clk_put(clk);
> failed_clock:
> return err;

If this is correct, it might be better to rename all the
uses of failed_req to failed_get and delete label failed_req.

2011-06-01 17:54:12

by walter harms

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/10] drivers/net/can/flexcan.c: add missing clk_put



Am 01.06.2011 19:10, schrieb Julia Lawall:
> From: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>
>
> The failed_get label is used after the call to clk_get has succeeded, so it
> should be moved up above the call to clk_put.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
> follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @r exists@
> expression e1,e2;
> statement S;
> @@
>
> e1 = clk_get@p1(...);
> ... when != e1 = e2
> when != clk_put(e1)
> when any
> if (...) { ... when != clk_put(e1)
> when != if (...) { ... clk_put(e1) ... }
> * return@p3 ...;
> } else S
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>
>
> ---
> drivers/net/can/flexcan.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> index d499056..121739c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> @@ -978,8 +978,8 @@ static int __devinit flexcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> failed_map:
> release_mem_region(mem->start, mem_size);
> failed_req:
> - clk_put(clk);
> failed_get:
> + clk_put(clk);
> failed_clock:
> return err;
> }
>

So failed_req == failed_get, is that intended ?

re,
wh

2011-06-01 20:04:57

by Julia Lawall

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/10] drivers/net/can/flexcan.c: add missing clk_put

On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, walter harms wrote:

>
>
> Am 01.06.2011 19:10, schrieb Julia Lawall:
> > From: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>
> >
> > The failed_get label is used after the call to clk_get has succeeded, so it
> > should be moved up above the call to clk_put.
> >
> > A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
> > follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> >
> > // <smpl>
> > @r exists@
> > expression e1,e2;
> > statement S;
> > @@
> >
> > e1 = clk_get@p1(...);
> > ... when != e1 = e2
> > when != clk_put(e1)
> > when any
> > if (...) { ... when != clk_put(e1)
> > when != if (...) { ... clk_put(e1) ... }
> > * return@p3 ...;
> > } else S
> > // </smpl>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/net/can/flexcan.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> > index d499056..121739c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> > @@ -978,8 +978,8 @@ static int __devinit flexcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > failed_map:
> > release_mem_region(mem->start, mem_size);
> > failed_req:
> > - clk_put(clk);
> > failed_get:
> > + clk_put(clk);
> > failed_clock:
> > return err;
> > }
> >
>
> So failed_req == failed_get, is that intended ?

I have the impression that it is. failed_req comes after successful
calls to platform_get_resource and platform_get_irq, which don't allocate
anything.

julia

2011-06-01 20:08:52

by Julia Lawall

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/10] drivers/net/can/flexcan.c: add missing clk_put

On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Joe Perches wrote:

> On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 19:10 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > The failed_get label is used after the call to clk_get has succeeded, so it
> > should be moved up above the call to clk_put.
> []
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> []
> > @@ -978,8 +978,8 @@ static int __devinit flexcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > failed_map:
> > release_mem_region(mem->start, mem_size);
> > failed_req:
> > - clk_put(clk);
> > failed_get:
> > + clk_put(clk);
> > failed_clock:
> > return err;
>
> If this is correct, it might be better to rename all the
> uses of failed_req to failed_get and delete label failed_req.

As I replied to Walter Harms, I believe it is correct, because I don't see
anything in the called functions that needs to be freed. I can redo the
patch to eliminate the label.

julia

2011-06-01 20:11:55

by David Miller

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/10] drivers/net/can/flexcan.c: add missing clk_put

From: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 22:08:46 +0200 (CEST)

> On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Joe Perches wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 19:10 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>> > The failed_get label is used after the call to clk_get has succeeded, so it
>> > should be moved up above the call to clk_put.
>> []
>> > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
>> []
>> > @@ -978,8 +978,8 @@ static int __devinit flexcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> > failed_map:
>> > release_mem_region(mem->start, mem_size);
>> > failed_req:
>> > - clk_put(clk);
>> > failed_get:
>> > + clk_put(clk);
>> > failed_clock:
>> > return err;
>>
>> If this is correct, it might be better to rename all the
>> uses of failed_req to failed_get and delete label failed_req.
>
> As I replied to Walter Harms, I believe it is correct, because I don't see
> anything in the called functions that needs to be freed. I can redo the
> patch to eliminate the label.

Please do.

2011-06-01 20:13:12

by Julia Lawall

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/10] drivers/net/can/flexcan.c: add missing clk_put

On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, David Miller wrote:

> From: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 22:08:46 +0200 (CEST)
>
> > On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 19:10 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >> > The failed_get label is used after the call to clk_get has succeeded, so it
> >> > should be moved up above the call to clk_put.
> >> []
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> >> []
> >> > @@ -978,8 +978,8 @@ static int __devinit flexcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> > failed_map:
> >> > release_mem_region(mem->start, mem_size);
> >> > failed_req:
> >> > - clk_put(clk);
> >> > failed_get:
> >> > + clk_put(clk);
> >> > failed_clock:
> >> > return err;
> >>
> >> If this is correct, it might be better to rename all the
> >> uses of failed_req to failed_get and delete label failed_req.
> >
> > As I replied to Walter Harms, I believe it is correct, because I don't see
> > anything in the called functions that needs to be freed. I can redo the
> > patch to eliminate the label.
>
> Please do.

OK, I will do it tomorrow.

julia

2011-06-02 05:48:58

by Julia Lawall

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/10] drivers/net/can/flexcan.c: add missing clk_put

From: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>

The failed_get label is used after the call to clk_get has succeeded, so it
should be moved up above the call to clk_put.

The failed_req labels doesn't do anything different than failed_get, so
delete it.

A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@r exists@
expression e1,e2;
statement S;
@@

e1 = clk_get@p1(...);
... when != e1 = e2
when != clk_put(e1)
when any
if (...) { ... when != clk_put(e1)
when != if (...) { ... clk_put(e1) ... }
* return@p3 ...;
} else S
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>

---
drivers/net/can/flexcan.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
index d499056..1767811 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
@@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ static int __devinit flexcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
mem_size = resource_size(mem);
if (!request_mem_region(mem->start, mem_size, pdev->name)) {
err = -EBUSY;
- goto failed_req;
+ goto failed_get;
}

base = ioremap(mem->start, mem_size);
@@ -977,9 +977,8 @@ static int __devinit flexcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
iounmap(base);
failed_map:
release_mem_region(mem->start, mem_size);
- failed_req:
- clk_put(clk);
failed_get:
+ clk_put(clk);
failed_clock:
return err;
}

2011-06-02 07:11:17

by David Miller

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/10] drivers/net/can/flexcan.c: add missing clk_put

From: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 07:48:50 +0200 (CEST)

> From: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>
>
> The failed_get label is used after the call to clk_get has succeeded, so it
> should be moved up above the call to clk_put.
>
> The failed_req labels doesn't do anything different than failed_get, so
> delete it.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
> follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
...
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>

Applied.