Add SC7280 to cpufreq-dt-platdev blacklist since the actual scaling is
handled by the 'qcom-cpufreq-hw' driver.
Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <[email protected]>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
index 5e07065ec22f..345418b8250e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
@@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id blacklist[] __initconst = {
{ .compatible = "qcom,msm8996", },
{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs404", },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7180", },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280", },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm845", },
{ .compatible = "st,stih407", },
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 07:58:20PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> Subject: cpufreq: blacklist SC7280 in cpufreq-dt-platdev
>
> Add SC7280 to cpufreq-dt-platdev blacklist since the actual scaling is
> handled by the 'qcom-cpufreq-hw' driver.
The coding style recommends the use of "allowlist" or "passlist" of
"blacklist":
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.12/source/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst#L338
It's existing code so you aren't necessarily expected to change it. But
you could still use the recommended terminology in the commit message.