From: Luca Ceresoli <[email protected]>
Back in January 2020 I sent a first batch of patches to improve I2C
documentation, titled "docs: i2c: rework I2C documentation, part I" [0] and
I wrote "I will continue to cover the rest of the sections later".
After about 2.5y, here I am with part II!
This series contains assorted improvements to the "Introduction"
section. The plan is to cover the remaining sections "later", but hopefully
sooner than in 2.5 more years.
Changes in v3:
* re-added "caveat ID" list based on Peter's comments
* reordered patches to fix typo first
Changes in v2:
* patches 7 and 8 unmodified, they still need Peter's review
* other patches remove as they have been applied
* a new, trivial, patch added after v1 discussion
[v2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/[email protected]/T/#t
[v1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/[email protected]/T/#t
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/[email protected]/
Luca
Luca Ceresoli (3):
docs: i2c: i2c-topology: fix typo
docs: i2c: i2c-topology: fix incorrect heading
docs: i2c: i2c-topology: reorder sections more logically
Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst | 214 ++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 115 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
From: Luca Ceresoli <[email protected]>
"Etc" here was never meant to be a heading, it became one while converting
to ReST.
It would be easy to just convert it to plain text, but rather remove it and
add an introductory text before the list that conveys the same meaning but
with a better reading flow.
Fixes: ccf988b66d69 ("docs: i2c: convert to ReST and add to driver-api bookset")
Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Rosin <[email protected]>
---
Changed in v3: none
Changed in v2: none
---
Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst b/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst
index c9ed3b4d6085..326a1198551e 100644
--- a/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst
+++ b/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ I2C muxes and complex topologies
There are a couple of reasons for building more complex I2C topologies
than a straight-forward I2C bus with one adapter and one or more devices.
+Some example use cases are:
+
1. A mux may be needed on the bus to prevent address collisions.
2. The bus may be accessible from some external bus master, and arbitration
@@ -14,9 +16,6 @@ than a straight-forward I2C bus with one adapter and one or more devices.
from the I2C bus, at least most of the time, and sits behind a gate
that has to be operated before the device can be accessed.
-Etc
-===
-
These constructs are represented as I2C adapter trees by Linux, where
each adapter has a parent adapter (except the root adapter) and zero or
more child adapters. The root adapter is the actual adapter that issues
--
2.34.1
From: Luca Ceresoli <[email protected]>
"intension" should have probably been "intention", however "intent" seems
even better.
Reported-by: Bagas Sanjaya <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Rosin <[email protected]>
---
Changed in v3:
- moved as first patch (Bagas)
Changed in v2:
- this patch is new in v2
---
Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst b/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst
index 7cb53819778e..c9ed3b4d6085 100644
--- a/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst
+++ b/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ ML2. It is not safe to build arbitrary topologies with two (or more)
I.e. the select-transfer-deselect transaction targeting e.g. device
address 0x42 behind mux-one may be interleaved with a similar
operation targeting device address 0x42 behind mux-two. The
- intension with such a topology would in this hypothetical example
+ intent with such a topology would in this hypothetical example
be that mux-one and mux-two should not be selected simultaneously,
but mux-locked muxes do not guarantee that in all topologies.
--
2.34.1
From: Luca Ceresoli <[email protected]>
The sequence of sections is a bit confusing here:
* we list the mux locking scheme for existing drivers before introducing
what mux locking schemes are
* we list the caveats for each locking scheme (which are tricky) before
the example of the simple use case
Restructure it entirely with the following logic:
* Intro ("I2C muxes and complex topologies")
* Locking
- mux-locked
- example
- caveats
- parent-locked
- example
- caveats
* Complex examples
* Mux type of existing device drivers
While there, also apply some other improvements:
* convert the caveat list from a table (with only one column carrying
content) to a bullet list.
* add a small introductory text to bridge the gap from listing the use
cases to telling about the hardware components to handle them and then
the device drivers that implement those.
* make empty lines usage more uniform
Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Rosin <[email protected]>
---
Changed in v3:
- rebased on the "fix typo" patch that was moved on top
- removed extra empty line (Peter)
- new syntax for the caveat list, keeping the "caveat ID" tag (Peter)
Changed in v2: none
---
Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst | 211 ++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 114 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst b/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst
index 326a1198551e..48fce0f7491b 100644
--- a/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst
+++ b/Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology.rst
@@ -16,7 +16,10 @@ Some example use cases are:
from the I2C bus, at least most of the time, and sits behind a gate
that has to be operated before the device can be accessed.
-These constructs are represented as I2C adapter trees by Linux, where
+Several types of hardware components such as I2C muxes, I2C gates and I2C
+arbitrators allow to handle such needs.
+
+These components are represented as I2C adapter trees by Linux, where
each adapter has a parent adapter (except the root adapter) and zero or
more child adapters. The root adapter is the actual adapter that issues
I2C transfers, and all adapters with a parent are part of an "i2c-mux"
@@ -34,46 +37,7 @@ Locking
=======
There are two variants of locking available to I2C muxes, they can be
-mux-locked or parent-locked muxes. As is evident from below, it can be
-useful to know if a mux is mux-locked or if it is parent-locked. The
-following list was correct at the time of writing:
-
-In drivers/i2c/muxes/:
-
-====================== =============================================
-i2c-arb-gpio-challenge Parent-locked
-i2c-mux-gpio Normally parent-locked, mux-locked iff
- all involved gpio pins are controlled by the
- same I2C root adapter that they mux.
-i2c-mux-gpmux Normally parent-locked, mux-locked iff
- specified in device-tree.
-i2c-mux-ltc4306 Mux-locked
-i2c-mux-mlxcpld Parent-locked
-i2c-mux-pca9541 Parent-locked
-i2c-mux-pca954x Parent-locked
-i2c-mux-pinctrl Normally parent-locked, mux-locked iff
- all involved pinctrl devices are controlled
- by the same I2C root adapter that they mux.
-i2c-mux-reg Parent-locked
-====================== =============================================
-
-In drivers/iio/:
-
-====================== =============================================
-gyro/mpu3050 Mux-locked
-imu/inv_mpu6050/ Mux-locked
-====================== =============================================
-
-In drivers/media/:
-
-======================= =============================================
-dvb-frontends/lgdt3306a Mux-locked
-dvb-frontends/m88ds3103 Parent-locked
-dvb-frontends/rtl2830 Parent-locked
-dvb-frontends/rtl2832 Mux-locked
-dvb-frontends/si2168 Mux-locked
-usb/cx231xx/ Parent-locked
-======================= =============================================
+mux-locked or parent-locked muxes.
Mux-locked muxes
@@ -88,40 +52,8 @@ full transaction, unrelated I2C transfers may interleave the different
stages of the transaction. This has the benefit that the mux driver
may be easier and cleaner to implement, but it has some caveats.
-==== =====================================================================
-ML1. If you build a topology with a mux-locked mux being the parent
- of a parent-locked mux, this might break the expectation from the
- parent-locked mux that the root adapter is locked during the
- transaction.
-
-ML2. It is not safe to build arbitrary topologies with two (or more)
- mux-locked muxes that are not siblings, when there are address
- collisions between the devices on the child adapters of these
- non-sibling muxes.
-
- I.e. the select-transfer-deselect transaction targeting e.g. device
- address 0x42 behind mux-one may be interleaved with a similar
- operation targeting device address 0x42 behind mux-two. The
- intent with such a topology would in this hypothetical example
- be that mux-one and mux-two should not be selected simultaneously,
- but mux-locked muxes do not guarantee that in all topologies.
-
-ML3. A mux-locked mux cannot be used by a driver for auto-closing
- gates/muxes, i.e. something that closes automatically after a given
- number (one, in most cases) of I2C transfers. Unrelated I2C transfers
- may creep in and close prematurely.
-
-ML4. If any non-I2C operation in the mux driver changes the I2C mux state,
- the driver has to lock the root adapter during that operation.
- Otherwise garbage may appear on the bus as seen from devices
- behind the mux, when an unrelated I2C transfer is in flight during
- the non-I2C mux-changing operation.
-==== =====================================================================
-
-
Mux-locked Example
-------------------
-
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
::
@@ -152,6 +84,43 @@ This means that accesses to D2 are lockout out for the full duration
of the entire operation. But accesses to D3 are possibly interleaved
at any point.
+Mux-locked caveats
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+When using a mux-locked mux, be aware of the following restrictions:
+
+[ML1]
+ If you build a topology with a mux-locked mux being the parent
+ of a parent-locked mux, this might break the expectation from the
+ parent-locked mux that the root adapter is locked during the
+ transaction.
+
+[ML2]
+ It is not safe to build arbitrary topologies with two (or more)
+ mux-locked muxes that are not siblings, when there are address
+ collisions between the devices on the child adapters of these
+ non-sibling muxes.
+
+ I.e. the select-transfer-deselect transaction targeting e.g. device
+ address 0x42 behind mux-one may be interleaved with a similar
+ operation targeting device address 0x42 behind mux-two. The
+ intent with such a topology would in this hypothetical example
+ be that mux-one and mux-two should not be selected simultaneously,
+ but mux-locked muxes do not guarantee that in all topologies.
+
+[ML3]
+ A mux-locked mux cannot be used by a driver for auto-closing
+ gates/muxes, i.e. something that closes automatically after a given
+ number (one, in most cases) of I2C transfers. Unrelated I2C transfers
+ may creep in and close prematurely.
+
+[ML4]
+ If any non-I2C operation in the mux driver changes the I2C mux state,
+ the driver has to lock the root adapter during that operation.
+ Otherwise garbage may appear on the bus as seen from devices
+ behind the mux, when an unrelated I2C transfer is in flight during
+ the non-I2C mux-changing operation.
+
Parent-locked muxes
-------------------
@@ -160,28 +129,10 @@ Parent-locked muxes lock the parent adapter during the full select-
transfer-deselect transaction. The implication is that the mux driver
has to ensure that any and all I2C transfers through that parent
adapter during the transaction are unlocked I2C transfers (using e.g.
-__i2c_transfer), or a deadlock will follow. There are a couple of
-caveats.
-
-==== ====================================================================
-PL1. If you build a topology with a parent-locked mux being the child
- of another mux, this might break a possible assumption from the
- child mux that the root adapter is unused between its select op
- and the actual transfer (e.g. if the child mux is auto-closing
- and the parent mux issues I2C transfers as part of its select).
- This is especially the case if the parent mux is mux-locked, but
- it may also happen if the parent mux is parent-locked.
-
-PL2. If select/deselect calls out to other subsystems such as gpio,
- pinctrl, regmap or iio, it is essential that any I2C transfers
- caused by these subsystems are unlocked. This can be convoluted to
- accomplish, maybe even impossible if an acceptably clean solution
- is sought.
-==== ====================================================================
-
+__i2c_transfer), or a deadlock will follow.
Parent-locked Example
----------------------
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
::
@@ -211,10 +162,30 @@ When there is an access to D1, this happens:
9. M1 unlocks its parent adapter.
10. M1 unlocks muxes on its parent.
-
This means that accesses to both D2 and D3 are locked out for the full
duration of the entire operation.
+Parent-locked Caveats
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+When using a parent-locked mux, be aware of the following restrictions:
+
+[PL1]
+ If you build a topology with a parent-locked mux being the child
+ of another mux, this might break a possible assumption from the
+ child mux that the root adapter is unused between its select op
+ and the actual transfer (e.g. if the child mux is auto-closing
+ and the parent mux issues I2C transfers as part of its select).
+ This is especially the case if the parent mux is mux-locked, but
+ it may also happen if the parent mux is parent-locked.
+
+[PL2]
+ If select/deselect calls out to other subsystems such as gpio,
+ pinctrl, regmap or iio, it is essential that any I2C transfers
+ caused by these subsystems are unlocked. This can be convoluted to
+ accomplish, maybe even impossible if an acceptably clean solution
+ is sought.
+
Complex Examples
================
@@ -260,8 +231,10 @@ This is a good topology::
When device D1 is accessed, accesses to D2 are locked out for the
full duration of the operation (muxes on the top child adapter of M1
are locked). But accesses to D3 and D4 are possibly interleaved at
-any point. Accesses to D3 locks out D1 and D2, but accesses to D4
-are still possibly interleaved.
+any point.
+
+Accesses to D3 locks out D1 and D2, but accesses to D4 are still possibly
+interleaved.
Mux-locked mux as parent of parent-locked mux
@@ -393,3 +366,47 @@ This is a good topology::
When D1 or D2 are accessed, accesses to D3 and D4 are locked out while
accesses to D5 may interleave. When D3 or D4 are accessed, accesses to
all other devices are locked out.
+
+
+Mux type of existing device drivers
+===================================
+
+Whether a device is mux-locked or parent-locked depends on its
+implementation. The following list was correct at the time of writing:
+
+In drivers/i2c/muxes/:
+
+====================== =============================================
+i2c-arb-gpio-challenge Parent-locked
+i2c-mux-gpio Normally parent-locked, mux-locked iff
+ all involved gpio pins are controlled by the
+ same I2C root adapter that they mux.
+i2c-mux-gpmux Normally parent-locked, mux-locked iff
+ specified in device-tree.
+i2c-mux-ltc4306 Mux-locked
+i2c-mux-mlxcpld Parent-locked
+i2c-mux-pca9541 Parent-locked
+i2c-mux-pca954x Parent-locked
+i2c-mux-pinctrl Normally parent-locked, mux-locked iff
+ all involved pinctrl devices are controlled
+ by the same I2C root adapter that they mux.
+i2c-mux-reg Parent-locked
+====================== =============================================
+
+In drivers/iio/:
+
+====================== =============================================
+gyro/mpu3050 Mux-locked
+imu/inv_mpu6050/ Mux-locked
+====================== =============================================
+
+In drivers/media/:
+
+======================= =============================================
+dvb-frontends/lgdt3306a Mux-locked
+dvb-frontends/m88ds3103 Parent-locked
+dvb-frontends/rtl2830 Parent-locked
+dvb-frontends/rtl2832 Mux-locked
+dvb-frontends/si2168 Mux-locked
+usb/cx231xx/ Parent-locked
+======================= =============================================
--
2.34.1
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:31:03AM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Luca Ceresoli <[email protected]>
>
> "Etc" here was never meant to be a heading, it became one while converting
> to ReST.
>
> It would be easy to just convert it to plain text, but rather remove it and
> add an introductory text before the list that conveys the same meaning but
> with a better reading flow.
>
> Fixes: ccf988b66d69 ("docs: i2c: convert to ReST and add to driver-api bookset")
> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Peter Rosin <[email protected]>
>
Applied to for-current, thanks!
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:31:02AM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Luca Ceresoli <[email protected]>
>
> "intension" should have probably been "intention", however "intent" seems
> even better.
>
> Reported-by: Bagas Sanjaya <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Peter Rosin <[email protected]>
>
Applied to for-current, thanks!
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:31:04AM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Luca Ceresoli <[email protected]>
>
> The sequence of sections is a bit confusing here:
>
> * we list the mux locking scheme for existing drivers before introducing
> what mux locking schemes are
> * we list the caveats for each locking scheme (which are tricky) before
> the example of the simple use case
>
> Restructure it entirely with the following logic:
>
> * Intro ("I2C muxes and complex topologies")
> * Locking
> - mux-locked
> - example
> - caveats
> - parent-locked
> - example
> - caveats
> * Complex examples
> * Mux type of existing device drivers
>
> While there, also apply some other improvements:
>
> * convert the caveat list from a table (with only one column carrying
> content) to a bullet list.
> * add a small introductory text to bridge the gap from listing the use
> cases to telling about the hardware components to handle them and then
> the device drivers that implement those.
> * make empty lines usage more uniform
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Peter Rosin <[email protected]>
>
Applied to for-current, thanks!