Each transfer test functions have same parameter checking code. This patch
unites those to an introduced function.
Signed-off-by: Shunsuke Mie <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v2:
* New patch
---
---
drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
index 8f786a225dcf..3bd9f135cdac 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
@@ -332,6 +332,17 @@ static bool pci_endpoint_test_msi_irq(struct pci_endpoint_test *test,
return false;
}
+static int pci_endpoint_test_validate_xfer_params(struct device *dev,
+ struct pci_endpoint_test_xfer_param *param, size_t alignment)
+{
+ if (param->size > SIZE_MAX - alignment) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Maximum transfer data size exceeded\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static bool pci_endpoint_test_copy(struct pci_endpoint_test *test,
unsigned long arg)
{
@@ -363,9 +374,13 @@ static bool pci_endpoint_test_copy(struct pci_endpoint_test *test,
return false;
}
+ err = pci_endpoint_test_validate_xfer_params(dev, ¶m, alignment);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Invalid parameter\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+
size = param.size;
- if (size > SIZE_MAX - alignment)
- goto err;
use_dma = !!(param.flags & PCITEST_FLAGS_USE_DMA);
if (use_dma)
@@ -497,9 +512,13 @@ static bool pci_endpoint_test_write(struct pci_endpoint_test *test,
return false;
}
+ err = pci_endpoint_test_validate_xfer_params(dev, ¶m, alignment);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Invalid parameter\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+
size = param.size;
- if (size > SIZE_MAX - alignment)
- goto err;
use_dma = !!(param.flags & PCITEST_FLAGS_USE_DMA);
if (use_dma)
@@ -595,9 +614,13 @@ static bool pci_endpoint_test_read(struct pci_endpoint_test *test,
return false;
}
+ err = pci_endpoint_test_validate_xfer_params(dev, ¶m, alignment);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Invalid parameter\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+
size = param.size;
- if (size > SIZE_MAX - alignment)
- goto err;
use_dma = !!(param.flags & PCITEST_FLAGS_USE_DMA);
if (use_dma)
--
2.17.1
The dma_map_single() doesn't permit zero length mapping. It causes a follow
panic.
A panic was reported on arm64:
[ 60.137988] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 60.142630] kernel BUG at kernel/dma/swiotlb.c:624!
[ 60.147508] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 60.152992] Modules linked in: dw_hdmi_cec crct10dif_ce simple_bridge rcar_fdp1 vsp1 rcar_vin videobuf2_vmalloc rcar_csi2 v4l
2_mem2mem videobuf2_dma_contig videobuf2_memops pci_endpoint_test videobuf2_v4l2 videobuf2_common rcar_fcp v4l2_fwnode v4l2_asyn
c videodev mc gpio_bd9571mwv max9611 pwm_rcar ccree at24 authenc libdes phy_rcar_gen3_usb3 usb_dmac display_connector pwm_bl
[ 60.186252] CPU: 0 PID: 508 Comm: pcitest Not tainted 6.0.0-rc1rpci-dev+ #237
[ 60.193387] Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X 2nd version board based on r8a77951 (DT)
[ 60.201302] pstate: 00000005 (nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[ 60.208263] pc : swiotlb_tbl_map_single+0x2c0/0x590
[ 60.213149] lr : swiotlb_map+0x88/0x1f0
[ 60.216982] sp : ffff80000a883bc0
[ 60.220292] x29: ffff80000a883bc0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 0000000000000000
[ 60.227430] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffff0004c0da20d0 x24: ffff80000a1f77c0
[ 60.234567] x23: 0000000000000002 x22: 0001000040000010 x21: 000000007a000000
[ 60.241703] x20: 0000000000200000 x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000
[ 60.248840] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: ffff0006ff7b9180
[ 60.255977] x14: ffff0006ff7b9180 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
[ 60.263113] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : 0000000000000000
[ 60.270249] x8 : 0001000000000010 x7 : ffff0004c6754b20 x6 : 0000000000000000
[ 60.277385] x5 : ffff0004c0da2090 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000001
[ 60.284521] x2 : 0000000040000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000040000010
[ 60.291658] Call trace:
[ 60.294100] swiotlb_tbl_map_single+0x2c0/0x590
[ 60.298629] swiotlb_map+0x88/0x1f0
[ 60.302115] dma_map_page_attrs+0x188/0x230
[ 60.306299] pci_endpoint_test_ioctl+0x5e4/0xd90 [pci_endpoint_test]
[ 60.312660] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xa8/0xf0
[ 60.316583] invoke_syscall+0x44/0x108
[ 60.320334] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xcc/0xf0
[ 60.325038] do_el0_svc+0x2c/0xb8
[ 60.328351] el0_svc+0x2c/0x88
[ 60.331406] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb8/0xc0
[ 60.335587] el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190
[ 60.339251] Code: 52800013 d2e00414 35fff45c d503201f (d4210000)
[ 60.345344] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
To fix it, this patch adds a checking the payload length if it is zero.
Fixes: 343dc693f7b7 ("misc: pci_endpoint_test: Prevent some integer overflows")
Signed-off-by: Shunsuke Mie <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v2:
* Move a checking code to an introduced function in previous patch
---
---
drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
index 3bd9f135cdac..a7193bf6a49f 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
@@ -335,6 +335,11 @@ static bool pci_endpoint_test_msi_irq(struct pci_endpoint_test *test,
static int pci_endpoint_test_validate_xfer_params(struct device *dev,
struct pci_endpoint_test_xfer_param *param, size_t alignment)
{
+ if (!param->size) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Data size is zero\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
if (param->size > SIZE_MAX - alignment) {
dev_err(dev, "Maximum transfer data size exceeded\n");
return -EINVAL;
--
2.17.1
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 07:15:54PM +0900, Shunsuke Mie wrote:
> Each transfer test functions have same parameter checking code. This patch
> unites those to an introduced function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shunsuke Mie <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> * New patch
> ---
> ---
> drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> index 8f786a225dcf..3bd9f135cdac 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> @@ -332,6 +332,17 @@ static bool pci_endpoint_test_msi_irq(struct pci_endpoint_test *test,
> return false;
> }
>
> +static int pci_endpoint_test_validate_xfer_params(struct device *dev,
> + struct pci_endpoint_test_xfer_param *param, size_t alignment)
> +{
> + if (param->size > SIZE_MAX - alignment) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Maximum transfer data size exceeded\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static bool pci_endpoint_test_copy(struct pci_endpoint_test *test,
> unsigned long arg)
> {
> @@ -363,9 +374,13 @@ static bool pci_endpoint_test_copy(struct pci_endpoint_test *test,
> return false;
> }
>
> + err = pci_endpoint_test_validate_xfer_params(dev, ¶m, alignment);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid parameter\n");
Also, you just printed 2 errors for the same error. Not needed.
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 07:15:54PM +0900, Shunsuke Mie wrote:
> Each transfer test functions have same parameter checking code. This patch
> unites those to an introduced function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shunsuke Mie <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> * New patch
> ---
> ---
> drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> index 8f786a225dcf..3bd9f135cdac 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> @@ -332,6 +332,17 @@ static bool pci_endpoint_test_msi_irq(struct pci_endpoint_test *test,
> return false;
> }
>
> +static int pci_endpoint_test_validate_xfer_params(struct device *dev,
> + struct pci_endpoint_test_xfer_param *param, size_t alignment)
> +{
> + if (param->size > SIZE_MAX - alignment) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Maximum transfer data size exceeded\n");
Do not allow userspace to spam the kernel log.
This should be dev_dbg() at most.
thanks,
greg k-h
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 07:15:55PM +0900, Shunsuke Mie wrote:
> The dma_map_single() doesn't permit zero length mapping. It causes a follow
> panic.
>
> A panic was reported on arm64:
>
> [ 60.137988] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 60.142630] kernel BUG at kernel/dma/swiotlb.c:624!
> [ 60.147508] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> [ 60.152992] Modules linked in: dw_hdmi_cec crct10dif_ce simple_bridge rcar_fdp1 vsp1 rcar_vin videobuf2_vmalloc rcar_csi2 v4l
> 2_mem2mem videobuf2_dma_contig videobuf2_memops pci_endpoint_test videobuf2_v4l2 videobuf2_common rcar_fcp v4l2_fwnode v4l2_asyn
> c videodev mc gpio_bd9571mwv max9611 pwm_rcar ccree at24 authenc libdes phy_rcar_gen3_usb3 usb_dmac display_connector pwm_bl
> [ 60.186252] CPU: 0 PID: 508 Comm: pcitest Not tainted 6.0.0-rc1rpci-dev+ #237
> [ 60.193387] Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X 2nd version board based on r8a77951 (DT)
> [ 60.201302] pstate: 00000005 (nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> [ 60.208263] pc : swiotlb_tbl_map_single+0x2c0/0x590
> [ 60.213149] lr : swiotlb_map+0x88/0x1f0
> [ 60.216982] sp : ffff80000a883bc0
> [ 60.220292] x29: ffff80000a883bc0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 0000000000000000
> [ 60.227430] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffff0004c0da20d0 x24: ffff80000a1f77c0
> [ 60.234567] x23: 0000000000000002 x22: 0001000040000010 x21: 000000007a000000
> [ 60.241703] x20: 0000000000200000 x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000
> [ 60.248840] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: ffff0006ff7b9180
> [ 60.255977] x14: ffff0006ff7b9180 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
> [ 60.263113] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : 0000000000000000
> [ 60.270249] x8 : 0001000000000010 x7 : ffff0004c6754b20 x6 : 0000000000000000
> [ 60.277385] x5 : ffff0004c0da2090 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000001
> [ 60.284521] x2 : 0000000040000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000040000010
> [ 60.291658] Call trace:
> [ 60.294100] swiotlb_tbl_map_single+0x2c0/0x590
> [ 60.298629] swiotlb_map+0x88/0x1f0
> [ 60.302115] dma_map_page_attrs+0x188/0x230
> [ 60.306299] pci_endpoint_test_ioctl+0x5e4/0xd90 [pci_endpoint_test]
> [ 60.312660] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xa8/0xf0
> [ 60.316583] invoke_syscall+0x44/0x108
> [ 60.320334] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xcc/0xf0
> [ 60.325038] do_el0_svc+0x2c/0xb8
> [ 60.328351] el0_svc+0x2c/0x88
> [ 60.331406] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb8/0xc0
> [ 60.335587] el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190
> [ 60.339251] Code: 52800013 d2e00414 35fff45c d503201f (d4210000)
> [ 60.345344] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>
> To fix it, this patch adds a checking the payload length if it is zero.
>
> Fixes: 343dc693f7b7 ("misc: pci_endpoint_test: Prevent some integer overflows")
> Signed-off-by: Shunsuke Mie <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> * Move a checking code to an introduced function in previous patch
> ---
> ---
> drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> index 3bd9f135cdac..a7193bf6a49f 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> @@ -335,6 +335,11 @@ static bool pci_endpoint_test_msi_irq(struct pci_endpoint_test *test,
> static int pci_endpoint_test_validate_xfer_params(struct device *dev,
> struct pci_endpoint_test_xfer_param *param, size_t alignment)
> {
> + if (!param->size) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Data size is zero\n");
Again, do not allow userspace to spam the kernel log.
thanks,
greg k-h
2022年9月6日(火) 19:58 Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>:
>
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 07:15:54PM +0900, Shunsuke Mie wrote:
> > Each transfer test functions have same parameter checking code. This patch
> > unites those to an introduced function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shunsuke Mie <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > * New patch
> > ---
> > ---
> > drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> > index 8f786a225dcf..3bd9f135cdac 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> > @@ -332,6 +332,17 @@ static bool pci_endpoint_test_msi_irq(struct pci_endpoint_test *test,
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > +static int pci_endpoint_test_validate_xfer_params(struct device *dev,
> > + struct pci_endpoint_test_xfer_param *param, size_t alignment)
> > +{
> > + if (param->size > SIZE_MAX - alignment) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "Maximum transfer data size exceeded\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static bool pci_endpoint_test_copy(struct pci_endpoint_test *test,
> > unsigned long arg)
> > {
> > @@ -363,9 +374,13 @@ static bool pci_endpoint_test_copy(struct pci_endpoint_test *test,
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > + err = pci_endpoint_test_validate_xfer_params(dev, ¶m, alignment);
> > + if (err) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "Invalid parameter\n");
>
> Also, you just printed 2 errors for the same error. Not needed.
I see. I'll also change to using the dev_dbg() in the next version.
Thanks,
Shunsuke