> + /* Try to acquire the smbus gw lock before any reads of the GW register since
> + * a read sets the lock.
> + */
Please use kernel multiline comment style.
> @@ -792,6 +824,8 @@ mlxbf_i2c_smbus_start_transaction(struct mlxbf_i2c_priv *priv,
> priv->smbus->io + MLXBF_I2C_SMBUS_MASTER_FSM);
> }
Dunno if this is taste, but I think it is easier to follow the locking
when we have central acquire and release points for it. So, I'd suggest
to add something like
out_unlock:
here and then goto to this place from the other locations.
What do you think?
>
> + mlxbf_i2c_smbus_master_unlock(priv);
> +
> return ret;
> + /* Try to acquire the smbus gw lock before any reads of the GW register since
> + * a read sets the lock.
> + */
Please use kernel multiline comment style.
Done.
> @@ -792,6 +824,8 @@ mlxbf_i2c_smbus_start_transaction(struct mlxbf_i2c_priv *priv,
> priv->smbus->io + MLXBF_I2C_SMBUS_MASTER_FSM);
> }
Dunno if this is taste, but I think it is easier to follow the locking when we have central acquire and release points for it. So, I'd suggest to add something like
out_unlock:
here and then goto to this place from the other locations.
What do you think?
Sure!
>
> + mlxbf_i2c_smbus_master_unlock(priv);
> +
> return ret;