2023-05-16 08:24:01

by Kai-Heng Feng

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] net: wwan: t7xx: Ensure init is completed before system sleep

When the system attempts to sleep while mtk_t7xx is not ready, the driver
cannot put the device to sleep:
[ 12.472918] mtk_t7xx 0000:57:00.0: [PM] Exiting suspend, modem in invalid state
[ 12.472936] mtk_t7xx 0000:57:00.0: PM: pci_pm_suspend(): t7xx_pci_pm_suspend+0x0/0x20 [mtk_t7xx] returns -14
[ 12.473678] mtk_t7xx 0000:57:00.0: PM: dpm_run_callback(): pci_pm_suspend+0x0/0x1b0 returns -14
[ 12.473711] mtk_t7xx 0000:57:00.0: PM: failed to suspend async: error -14
[ 12.764776] PM: Some devices failed to suspend, or early wake event detected

Mediatek confirmed the device can take a rather long time to complete
its initialization, so wait for up to 20 seconds until init is done.

Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_pci.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_pci.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_pci.c b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_pci.c
index 226fc1703e90..7ae85f09cdbf 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_pci.c
@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ static int t7xx_pci_pm_init(struct t7xx_pci_dev *t7xx_dev)
spin_lock_init(&t7xx_dev->md_pm_lock);
init_completion(&t7xx_dev->sleep_lock_acquire);
init_completion(&t7xx_dev->pm_sr_ack);
+ init_completion(&t7xx_dev->init_done);
atomic_set(&t7xx_dev->md_pm_state, MTK_PM_INIT);

device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, true);
@@ -124,6 +125,7 @@ void t7xx_pci_pm_init_late(struct t7xx_pci_dev *t7xx_dev)
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&t7xx_dev->pdev->dev);
pm_runtime_allow(&t7xx_dev->pdev->dev);
pm_runtime_put_noidle(&t7xx_dev->pdev->dev);
+ complete_all(&t7xx_dev->init_done);
}

static int t7xx_pci_pm_reinit(struct t7xx_pci_dev *t7xx_dev)
@@ -529,6 +531,18 @@ static void t7xx_pci_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev)
__t7xx_pci_pm_suspend(pdev);
}

+static int t7xx_pci_pm_prepare(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
+ struct t7xx_pci_dev *t7xx_dev;
+
+ t7xx_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&t7xx_dev->init_done, 20 * HZ))
+ dev_warn(dev, "Not ready for system sleep.\n");
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int t7xx_pci_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
return __t7xx_pci_pm_suspend(to_pci_dev(dev));
@@ -555,6 +569,7 @@ static int t7xx_pci_pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
}

static const struct dev_pm_ops t7xx_pci_pm_ops = {
+ .prepare = t7xx_pci_pm_prepare,
.suspend = t7xx_pci_pm_suspend,
.resume = t7xx_pci_pm_resume,
.resume_noirq = t7xx_pci_pm_resume_noirq,
diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_pci.h b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_pci.h
index 112efa534eac..f08f1ab74469 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_pci.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_pci.h
@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ struct t7xx_pci_dev {
struct t7xx_modem *md;
struct t7xx_ccmni_ctrl *ccmni_ctlb;
bool rgu_pci_irq_en;
+ struct completion init_done;

/* Low Power Items */
struct list_head md_pm_entities;
--
2.34.1



2023-05-16 10:54:12

by Piotr Raczynski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: wwan: t7xx: Ensure init is completed before system sleep

On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 04:03:27PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> When the system attempts to sleep while mtk_t7xx is not ready, the driver
> cannot put the device to sleep:
> [ 12.472918] mtk_t7xx 0000:57:00.0: [PM] Exiting suspend, modem in invalid state
> [ 12.472936] mtk_t7xx 0000:57:00.0: PM: pci_pm_suspend(): t7xx_pci_pm_suspend+0x0/0x20 [mtk_t7xx] returns -14
> [ 12.473678] mtk_t7xx 0000:57:00.0: PM: dpm_run_callback(): pci_pm_suspend+0x0/0x1b0 returns -14
> [ 12.473711] mtk_t7xx 0000:57:00.0: PM: failed to suspend async: error -14
> [ 12.764776] PM: Some devices failed to suspend, or early wake event detected
>
> Mediatek confirmed the device can take a rather long time to complete
> its initialization, so wait for up to 20 seconds until init is done.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <[email protected]>

Does it fix any issue? Anyway target tree would help here I guess.

[...]

> +static int t7xx_pci_pm_prepare(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> + struct t7xx_pci_dev *t7xx_dev;
> +
> + t7xx_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&t7xx_dev->init_done, 20 * HZ))

#define T7XX_INIT_TIMEOUT or something similar wouldn't do any harm here.

> + dev_warn(dev, "Not ready for system sleep.\n");
> +
> + return 0;

So in case of a timeout you still return 0, is that OK?

[...]
Thanks, Piotr.

2023-05-17 04:42:59

by Kai-Heng Feng

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: wwan: t7xx: Ensure init is completed before system sleep

On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 6:42 PM Piotr Raczynski
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 04:03:27PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> > When the system attempts to sleep while mtk_t7xx is not ready, the driver
> > cannot put the device to sleep:
> > [ 12.472918] mtk_t7xx 0000:57:00.0: [PM] Exiting suspend, modem in invalid state
> > [ 12.472936] mtk_t7xx 0000:57:00.0: PM: pci_pm_suspend(): t7xx_pci_pm_suspend+0x0/0x20 [mtk_t7xx] returns -14
> > [ 12.473678] mtk_t7xx 0000:57:00.0: PM: dpm_run_callback(): pci_pm_suspend+0x0/0x1b0 returns -14
> > [ 12.473711] mtk_t7xx 0000:57:00.0: PM: failed to suspend async: error -14
> > [ 12.764776] PM: Some devices failed to suspend, or early wake event detected
> >
> > Mediatek confirmed the device can take a rather long time to complete
> > its initialization, so wait for up to 20 seconds until init is done.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <[email protected]>
>
> Does it fix any issue? Anyway target tree would help here I guess.

It fixes "PM: failed to suspend async: error -14" mentioned in the
commit message.

>
> [...]
>
> > +static int t7xx_pci_pm_prepare(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > + struct t7xx_pci_dev *t7xx_dev;
> > +
> > + t7xx_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > + if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&t7xx_dev->init_done, 20 * HZ))
>
> #define T7XX_INIT_TIMEOUT or something similar wouldn't do any harm here.

Sure, will do in next revision.

>
> > + dev_warn(dev, "Not ready for system sleep.\n");
> > +
> > + return 0;
>
> So in case of a timeout you still return 0, is that OK?

You are right, error code should be returned instead.

Kai-Heng

>
> [...]
> Thanks, Piotr.