After commit 01feba590cd6 ("ACPI: Do not create new NUMA domains from
ACPI static tables that are not SRAT"):
$ scripts/config --file arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig -d NUMA -e ACPI_NFIT
$ make -skj"$(nproc)" distclean defconfig drivers/acpi/nfit/
drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c: In function ‘acpi_nfit_register_region’:
drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c:3010:27: error: implicit declaration of
function ‘pxm_to_node’; did you mean ‘xa_to_node’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
3010 | ndr_desc->target_node = pxm_to_node(spa->proximity_domain);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
| xa_to_node
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
...
Add a stub function like acpi_map_pxm_to_node had so that the build
continues to work.
Fixes: 01feba590cd6 ("ACPI: Do not create new NUMA domains from ACPI static tables that are not SRAT")
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
---
I am not sure if this is the right place or value for this. It looks
like there is going to be another stub function added here, which is
going through -mm:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/159643094925.4062302.14979872973043772305.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
include/acpi/acpi_numa.h | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_numa.h b/include/acpi/acpi_numa.h
index fdebcfc6c8df..09eb3bc20ff5 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_numa.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_numa.h
@@ -22,5 +22,10 @@ extern int acpi_numa __initdata;
extern void bad_srat(void);
extern int srat_disabled(void);
+#else /* CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA */
+static inline int pxm_to_node(int pxm)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA */
#endif /* __ACP_NUMA_H */
base-commit: eb6335b68ce3fc85a93c4c6cd3bb6bc5ac490efe
--
2.28.0
On 9/28/20 12:45 PM, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> After commit 01feba590cd6 ("ACPI: Do not create new NUMA domains from
> ACPI static tables that are not SRAT"):
>
> $ scripts/config --file arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig -d NUMA -e ACPI_NFIT
>
> $ make -skj"$(nproc)" distclean defconfig drivers/acpi/nfit/
> drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c: In function ‘acpi_nfit_register_region’:
> drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c:3010:27: error: implicit declaration of
> function ‘pxm_to_node’; did you mean ‘xa_to_node’?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 3010 | ndr_desc->target_node = pxm_to_node(spa->proximity_domain);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> | xa_to_node
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> ...
>
> Add a stub function like acpi_map_pxm_to_node had so that the build
> continues to work.
>
> Fixes: 01feba590cd6 ("ACPI: Do not create new NUMA domains from ACPI static tables that are not SRAT")
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> I am not sure if this is the right place or value for this. It looks
> like there is going to be another stub function added here, which is
> going through -mm:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/159643094925.4062302.14979872973043772305.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
>
> include/acpi/acpi_numa.h | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_numa.h b/include/acpi/acpi_numa.h
> index fdebcfc6c8df..09eb3bc20ff5 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/acpi_numa.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_numa.h
> @@ -22,5 +22,10 @@ extern int acpi_numa __initdata;
> extern void bad_srat(void);
> extern int srat_disabled(void);
>
> +#else /* CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA */
> +static inline int pxm_to_node(int pxm)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA */
> #endif /* __ACP_NUMA_H */
>
> base-commit: eb6335b68ce3fc85a93c4c6cd3bb6bc5ac490efe
OK, that works/builds. It doesn't quite apply cleanly to linux-next-20200929
but that's a minor detail and easy to get around.
Thanks.
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> # build-tested
--
~Randy
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:13:24 -0700
Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 9/28/20 12:45 PM, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > After commit 01feba590cd6 ("ACPI: Do not create new NUMA domains from
> > ACPI static tables that are not SRAT"):
> >
> > $ scripts/config --file arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig -d NUMA -e ACPI_NFIT
> >
> > $ make -skj"$(nproc)" distclean defconfig drivers/acpi/nfit/
> > drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c: In function ‘acpi_nfit_register_region’:
> > drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c:3010:27: error: implicit declaration of
> > function ‘pxm_to_node’; did you mean ‘xa_to_node’?
> > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 3010 | ndr_desc->target_node = pxm_to_node(spa->proximity_domain);
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > | xa_to_node
> > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> > ...
> >
> > Add a stub function like acpi_map_pxm_to_node had so that the build
> > continues to work.
> >
> > Fixes: 01feba590cd6 ("ACPI: Do not create new NUMA domains from ACPI static tables that are not SRAT")
> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >
> > I am not sure if this is the right place or value for this. It looks
> > like there is going to be another stub function added here, which is
> > going through -mm:
> >
> > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/159643094925.4062302.14979872973043772305.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
> >
> > include/acpi/acpi_numa.h | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_numa.h b/include/acpi/acpi_numa.h
> > index fdebcfc6c8df..09eb3bc20ff5 100644
> > --- a/include/acpi/acpi_numa.h
> > +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_numa.h
> > @@ -22,5 +22,10 @@ extern int acpi_numa __initdata;
> > extern void bad_srat(void);
> > extern int srat_disabled(void);
> >
> > +#else /* CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA */
> > +static inline int pxm_to_node(int pxm)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA */
> > #endif /* __ACP_NUMA_H */
> >
> > base-commit: eb6335b68ce3fc85a93c4c6cd3bb6bc5ac490efe
>
> OK, that works/builds. It doesn't quite apply cleanly to linux-next-20200929
> but that's a minor detail and easy to get around.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> # build-tested
>
Looks correct to me. Thanks!
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
On 2020/9/29 3:45, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> After commit 01feba590cd6 ("ACPI: Do not create new NUMA domains from
> ACPI static tables that are not SRAT"):
>
> $ scripts/config --file arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig -d NUMA -e ACPI_NFIT
>
> $ make -skj"$(nproc)" distclean defconfig drivers/acpi/nfit/
> drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c: In function ‘acpi_nfit_register_region’:
> drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c:3010:27: error: implicit declaration of
> function ‘pxm_to_node’; did you mean ‘xa_to_node’?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 3010 | ndr_desc->target_node = pxm_to_node(spa->proximity_domain);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> | xa_to_node
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> ...
>
> Add a stub function like acpi_map_pxm_to_node had so that the build
> continues to work.
>
> Fixes: 01feba590cd6 ("ACPI: Do not create new NUMA domains from ACPI static tables that are not SRAT")
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> I am not sure if this is the right place or value for this. It looks
> like there is going to be another stub function added here, which is
> going through -mm:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/159643094925.4062302.14979872973043772305.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
>
> include/acpi/acpi_numa.h | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_numa.h b/include/acpi/acpi_numa.h
> index fdebcfc6c8df..09eb3bc20ff5 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/acpi_numa.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_numa.h
> @@ -22,5 +22,10 @@ extern int acpi_numa __initdata;
> extern void bad_srat(void);
> extern int srat_disabled(void);
>
> +#else /* CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA */
> +static inline int pxm_to_node(int pxm)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA */
> #endif /* __ACP_NUMA_H */
Looks good to me,
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <[email protected]>
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:07 AM Hanjun Guo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 2020/9/29 3:45, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > After commit 01feba590cd6 ("ACPI: Do not create new NUMA domains from
> > ACPI static tables that are not SRAT"):
> >
> > $ scripts/config --file arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig -d NUMA -e ACPI_NFIT
> >
> > $ make -skj"$(nproc)" distclean defconfig drivers/acpi/nfit/
> > drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c: In function ‘acpi_nfit_register_region’:
> > drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c:3010:27: error: implicit declaration of
> > function ‘pxm_to_node’; did you mean ‘xa_to_node’?
> > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 3010 | ndr_desc->target_node = pxm_to_node(spa->proximity_domain);
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > | xa_to_node
> > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> > ...
> >
> > Add a stub function like acpi_map_pxm_to_node had so that the build
> > continues to work.
> >
> > Fixes: 01feba590cd6 ("ACPI: Do not create new NUMA domains from ACPI static tables that are not SRAT")
> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >
> > I am not sure if this is the right place or value for this. It looks
> > like there is going to be another stub function added here, which is
> > going through -mm:
> >
> > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/159643094925.4062302.14979872973043772305.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
> >
> > include/acpi/acpi_numa.h | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_numa.h b/include/acpi/acpi_numa.h
> > index fdebcfc6c8df..09eb3bc20ff5 100644
> > --- a/include/acpi/acpi_numa.h
> > +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_numa.h
> > @@ -22,5 +22,10 @@ extern int acpi_numa __initdata;
> > extern void bad_srat(void);
> > extern int srat_disabled(void);
> >
> > +#else /* CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA */
> > +static inline int pxm_to_node(int pxm)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA */
> > #endif /* __ACP_NUMA_H */
>
> Looks good to me,
>
> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <[email protected]>
Patch applied, thanks!