2022-09-27 21:32:14

by Paul E. McKenney

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 27 (uml 64-bit or 32-bit: tinyconfig)

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 02:13:29PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>
> On 9/27/22 13:10, [email protected] wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20220923:
> >
>
> In file included from ../include/linux/notifier.h:16,
> from ../include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:7,
> from ../include/linux/mmzone.h:1244,
> from ../include/linux/gfp.h:7,
> from ../include/linux/slab.h:15,
> from ../include/linux/crypto.h:20,
> from ../arch/x86/um/shared/sysdep/kernel-offsets.h:5,
> from ../arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.c:1:
> ../include/linux/srcu.h: In function ‘srcu_read_lock_nmisafe’:
> ../include/linux/srcu.h:181:26: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__srcu_read_lock_nmisafe’; did you mean ‘srcu_read_lock_nmisafe’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 181 | retval = __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(ssp, true);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | srcu_read_lock_nmisafe
> ../include/linux/srcu.h: In function ‘srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe’:
> ../include/linux/srcu.h:226:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe’; did you mean ‘srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 226 | __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(ssp, idx, true);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe

Could you please send your .config or tell me how you generated it?

Thanx, Paul


2022-09-27 21:51:09

by Randy Dunlap

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 27 (uml 64-bit or 32-bit: tinyconfig)



On 9/27/22 14:28, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 02:13:29PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/27/22 13:10, [email protected] wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20220923:
>>>
>>
>> In file included from ../include/linux/notifier.h:16,
>> from ../include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:7,
>> from ../include/linux/mmzone.h:1244,
>> from ../include/linux/gfp.h:7,
>> from ../include/linux/slab.h:15,
>> from ../include/linux/crypto.h:20,
>> from ../arch/x86/um/shared/sysdep/kernel-offsets.h:5,
>> from ../arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.c:1:
>> ../include/linux/srcu.h: In function ‘srcu_read_lock_nmisafe’:
>> ../include/linux/srcu.h:181:26: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__srcu_read_lock_nmisafe’; did you mean ‘srcu_read_lock_nmisafe’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> 181 | retval = __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(ssp, true);
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> | srcu_read_lock_nmisafe
>> ../include/linux/srcu.h: In function ‘srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe’:
>> ../include/linux/srcu.h:226:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe’; did you mean ‘srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> 226 | __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(ssp, idx, true);
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> | srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe
>
> Could you please send your .config or tell me how you generated it?


For x86_64 SUBARCH, ARCH=um:

mkdir UML64
make ARCH=um SUBARCH=x86_64 O=UML64 tinyconfig
make ARCH=um SUBARCH=x86_64 O=UML64 all


--
~Randy

2022-09-27 22:55:26

by Paul E. McKenney

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 27 (uml 64-bit or 32-bit: tinyconfig)

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 02:33:19PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>
> On 9/27/22 14:28, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 02:13:29PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 9/27/22 13:10, [email protected] wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Changes since 20220923:
> >>>
> >>
> >> In file included from ../include/linux/notifier.h:16,
> >> from ../include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:7,
> >> from ../include/linux/mmzone.h:1244,
> >> from ../include/linux/gfp.h:7,
> >> from ../include/linux/slab.h:15,
> >> from ../include/linux/crypto.h:20,
> >> from ../arch/x86/um/shared/sysdep/kernel-offsets.h:5,
> >> from ../arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.c:1:
> >> ../include/linux/srcu.h: In function ‘srcu_read_lock_nmisafe’:
> >> ../include/linux/srcu.h:181:26: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__srcu_read_lock_nmisafe’; did you mean ‘srcu_read_lock_nmisafe’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >> 181 | retval = __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(ssp, true);
> >> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> | srcu_read_lock_nmisafe
> >> ../include/linux/srcu.h: In function ‘srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe’:
> >> ../include/linux/srcu.h:226:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe’; did you mean ‘srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >> 226 | __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(ssp, idx, true);
> >> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> | srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe
> >
> > Could you please send your .config or tell me how you generated it?
>
>
> For x86_64 SUBARCH, ARCH=um:
>
> mkdir UML64
> make ARCH=um SUBARCH=x86_64 O=UML64 tinyconfig
> make ARCH=um SUBARCH=x86_64 O=UML64 all

Thank you! The diff shown below clears it up for me. Does it cover it
for you as well?

Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h
index 274d7200ce4e..565f60d57484 100644
--- a/include/linux/srcu.h
+++ b/include/linux/srcu.h
@@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ int init_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp);
#else
/* Dummy definition for things like notifiers. Actual use gets link error. */
struct srcu_struct { };
+int __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp, bool chknmisafe) __acquires(ssp);
+void __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx, bool chknmisafe) __releases(ssp);
#endif

void call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *head,

2022-09-28 04:00:31

by Randy Dunlap

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 27 (uml 64-bit or 32-bit: tinyconfig)

Hi Paul,

On 9/27/22 15:42, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 02:33:19PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/27/22 14:28, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 02:13:29PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 9/27/22 13:10, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes since 20220923:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In file included from ../include/linux/notifier.h:16,
>>>> from ../include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:7,
>>>> from ../include/linux/mmzone.h:1244,
>>>> from ../include/linux/gfp.h:7,
>>>> from ../include/linux/slab.h:15,
>>>> from ../include/linux/crypto.h:20,
>>>> from ../arch/x86/um/shared/sysdep/kernel-offsets.h:5,
>>>> from ../arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.c:1:
>>>> ../include/linux/srcu.h: In function ‘srcu_read_lock_nmisafe’:
>>>> ../include/linux/srcu.h:181:26: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__srcu_read_lock_nmisafe’; did you mean ‘srcu_read_lock_nmisafe’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>>> 181 | retval = __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(ssp, true);
>>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>> | srcu_read_lock_nmisafe
>>>> ../include/linux/srcu.h: In function ‘srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe’:
>>>> ../include/linux/srcu.h:226:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe’; did you mean ‘srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>>> 226 | __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(ssp, idx, true);
>>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>> | srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe
>>>
>>> Could you please send your .config or tell me how you generated it?
>>
>>
>> For x86_64 SUBARCH, ARCH=um:
>>
>> mkdir UML64
>> make ARCH=um SUBARCH=x86_64 O=UML64 tinyconfig
>> make ARCH=um SUBARCH=x86_64 O=UML64 all
>
> Thank you! The diff shown below clears it up for me. Does it cover it
> for you as well?

Works for me. Thanks.
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> # build-tested

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h
> index 274d7200ce4e..565f60d57484 100644
> --- a/include/linux/srcu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/srcu.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ int init_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp);
> #else
> /* Dummy definition for things like notifiers. Actual use gets link error. */
> struct srcu_struct { };
> +int __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp, bool chknmisafe) __acquires(ssp);
> +void __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx, bool chknmisafe) __releases(ssp);
> #endif
>
> void call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *head,

--
~Randy

2022-09-28 07:00:45

by Paul E. McKenney

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 27 (uml 64-bit or 32-bit: tinyconfig)

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 08:27:13PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On 9/27/22 15:42, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 02:33:19PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 9/27/22 14:28, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 02:13:29PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 9/27/22 13:10, [email protected] wrote:
> >>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Changes since 20220923:
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> In file included from ../include/linux/notifier.h:16,
> >>>> from ../include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:7,
> >>>> from ../include/linux/mmzone.h:1244,
> >>>> from ../include/linux/gfp.h:7,
> >>>> from ../include/linux/slab.h:15,
> >>>> from ../include/linux/crypto.h:20,
> >>>> from ../arch/x86/um/shared/sysdep/kernel-offsets.h:5,
> >>>> from ../arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.c:1:
> >>>> ../include/linux/srcu.h: In function ‘srcu_read_lock_nmisafe’:
> >>>> ../include/linux/srcu.h:181:26: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__srcu_read_lock_nmisafe’; did you mean ‘srcu_read_lock_nmisafe’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >>>> 181 | retval = __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(ssp, true);
> >>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>>> | srcu_read_lock_nmisafe
> >>>> ../include/linux/srcu.h: In function ‘srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe’:
> >>>> ../include/linux/srcu.h:226:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe’; did you mean ‘srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >>>> 226 | __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(ssp, idx, true);
> >>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>>> | srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe
> >>>
> >>> Could you please send your .config or tell me how you generated it?
> >>
> >>
> >> For x86_64 SUBARCH, ARCH=um:
> >>
> >> mkdir UML64
> >> make ARCH=um SUBARCH=x86_64 O=UML64 tinyconfig
> >> make ARCH=um SUBARCH=x86_64 O=UML64 all
> >
> > Thank you! The diff shown below clears it up for me. Does it cover it
> > for you as well?
>
> Works for me. Thanks.
> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> # build-tested

Thank you, Randy!

Thanx, Paul

> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h
> > index 274d7200ce4e..565f60d57484 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/srcu.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/srcu.h
> > @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ int init_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp);
> > #else
> > /* Dummy definition for things like notifiers. Actual use gets link error. */
> > struct srcu_struct { };
> > +int __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp, bool chknmisafe) __acquires(ssp);
> > +void __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx, bool chknmisafe) __releases(ssp);
> > #endif
> >
> > void call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *head,
>
> --
> ~Randy