The arm and arm64 versions of hypercall.h are missing the include
guards. This is needed because C inlines for privcmd_call are going to
be added to the files.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h | 4 ++++
arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h | 4 ++++
include/xen/arm/hypercall.h | 6 +++---
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h
index 3522cbaed316..c6882bba5284 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h
@@ -1 +1,5 @@
+#ifndef _ASM_ARM_XEN_HYPERCALL_H
+#define _ASM_ARM_XEN_HYPERCALL_H
#include <xen/arm/hypercall.h>
+
+#endif /* _ASM_ARM_XEN_HYPERCALL_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h
index 3522cbaed316..c3198f9ccd2e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h
@@ -1 +1,5 @@
+#ifndef _ASM_ARM64_XEN_HYPERCALL_H
+#define _ASM_ARM64_XEN_HYPERCALL_H
#include <xen/arm/hypercall.h>
+
+#endif /* _ASM_ARM64_XEN_HYPERCALL_H */
diff --git a/include/xen/arm/hypercall.h b/include/xen/arm/hypercall.h
index b40485e54d80..babcc08af965 100644
--- a/include/xen/arm/hypercall.h
+++ b/include/xen/arm/hypercall.h
@@ -30,8 +30,8 @@
* IN THE SOFTWARE.
*/
-#ifndef _ASM_ARM_XEN_HYPERCALL_H
-#define _ASM_ARM_XEN_HYPERCALL_H
+#ifndef _ARM_XEN_HYPERCALL_H
+#define _ARM_XEN_HYPERCALL_H
#include <linux/bug.h>
@@ -88,4 +88,4 @@ MULTI_mmu_update(struct multicall_entry *mcl, struct mmu_update *req,
BUG();
}
-#endif /* _ASM_ARM_XEN_HYPERCALL_H */
+#endif /* _ARM_XEN_HYPERCALL_H */
--
2.17.1
On Thu, 2 Jan 2020, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> The arm and arm64 versions of hypercall.h are missing the include
> guards. This is needed because C inlines for privcmd_call are going to
> be added to the files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h | 4 ++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h | 4 ++++
> include/xen/arm/hypercall.h | 6 +++---
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h
> index 3522cbaed316..c6882bba5284 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h
> @@ -1 +1,5 @@
> +#ifndef _ASM_ARM_XEN_HYPERCALL_H
> +#define _ASM_ARM_XEN_HYPERCALL_H
> #include <xen/arm/hypercall.h>
> +
> +#endif /* _ASM_ARM_XEN_HYPERCALL_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h
> index 3522cbaed316..c3198f9ccd2e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h
> @@ -1 +1,5 @@
> +#ifndef _ASM_ARM64_XEN_HYPERCALL_H
> +#define _ASM_ARM64_XEN_HYPERCALL_H
> #include <xen/arm/hypercall.h>
> +
> +#endif /* _ASM_ARM64_XEN_HYPERCALL_H */
> diff --git a/include/xen/arm/hypercall.h b/include/xen/arm/hypercall.h
> index b40485e54d80..babcc08af965 100644
> --- a/include/xen/arm/hypercall.h
> +++ b/include/xen/arm/hypercall.h
> @@ -30,8 +30,8 @@
> * IN THE SOFTWARE.
> */
>
> -#ifndef _ASM_ARM_XEN_HYPERCALL_H
> -#define _ASM_ARM_XEN_HYPERCALL_H
> +#ifndef _ARM_XEN_HYPERCALL_H
> +#define _ARM_XEN_HYPERCALL_H
>
> #include <linux/bug.h>
>
> @@ -88,4 +88,4 @@ MULTI_mmu_update(struct multicall_entry *mcl, struct mmu_update *req,
> BUG();
> }
>
> -#endif /* _ASM_ARM_XEN_HYPERCALL_H */
> +#endif /* _ARM_XEN_HYPERCALL_H */
> --
> 2.17.1
>
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 12:19 PM Stefano Stabellini
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2 Jan 2020, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> > The arm and arm64 versions of hypercall.h are missing the include
> > guards. This is needed because C inlines for privcmd_call are going to
> > be added to the files.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <[email protected]>
>
> Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <[email protected]>
Thank you,
Pasha