Folks,
Palmer has asked me to collect patches for the v5.2-rc releases and v5.3
merge window, so I'll be doing so. This is just a heads-up so no one is
surprised to see 'patch queued' responses from me.
- Paul
Paul Walmsley <[email protected]> writes:
> Palmer has asked me to collect patches for the v5.2-rc releases and v5.3
> merge window, so I'll be doing so. This is just a heads-up so no one is
> surprised to see 'patch queued' responses from me.
Speaking of v5.2-rc, any chance your DT series will make it for v5.2?
I'm hoping to have upstream v5.2 ready for testing in kernelCI, and
that's one of the last missing pieces. I just tested it on v5.2-rc3 and
it's working great with mainline u-boot.
The other one is the default defconfig, which I'll submit a patch for
shortly.
Kevin
+ Rob, devicetree@, Mark
On Wed, 5 Jun 2019, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Paul Walmsley <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > Palmer has asked me to collect patches for the v5.2-rc releases and v5.3
> > merge window, so I'll be doing so. This is just a heads-up so no one is
> > surprised to see 'patch queued' responses from me.
>
> Speaking of v5.2-rc, any chance your DT series will make it for v5.2?
Ideally it would be nice to get acks from the DT folks first for:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/[email protected]/T/#u
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/[email protected]/T/#u
If those come soon, I'd be fine with submitting them for v5.2-rc. But if
that stretches much further into the v5.2-rc series, it seems best to
schedule it for v5.3.
> I'm hoping to have upstream v5.2 ready for testing in kernelCI, and
> that's one of the last missing pieces. I just tested it on v5.2-rc3 and
> it's working great with mainline u-boot.
OK, great. Thanks again for your testing help.
- Paul