On Wed, 20 May 2015, nick wrote:
> >>> This fixes the bug,https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97951
> >>> related to incorrecting using 0x07dc for the vendor id for
> >>> USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3 devices and instead changing in
> >>> to the correct vendor id of 0x07de.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <[email protected]>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/hid/hid-ids.h | 2 +-
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h b/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h
> >>> index 41f167e..2e51947 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h
> >>> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h
> >>> @@ -670,7 +670,7 @@
> >>> #define USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_SURFACE_PRO_2 0x0799
> >>> #define USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TOUCH_COVER_2 0x07a7
> >>> #define USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_2 0x07a9
> >>> -#define USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3 0x07dc
> >>> +#define USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3 0x07de
> >>> #define USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3_JP 0x07dd
> >>>
> >>> #define USB_VENDOR_ID_MOJO 0x8282
> >>
> >> Why are you resending this without reacting to my original response to
> >> your mail?
> >>
> > This has been discussed as Alan stated the device he has comes with the American and not the Japanese vendor ID . If you still don't believe me I will quote his exact words.
> > Nick
> >> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1505.1/01419.html
> >
> Jiri, I have not heard a respond about this patch being accepted. If you
> can get another to replying to me this week about it that would be
> great.
I still haven't received any pointer or reason why we don't want both
(i.e. how come that 0x07dc was initially submitted and all of a sudden
it's not needed).
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs