On Thursday 2012-07-26 06:24, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
>Hi Masatake,
>
>* Masatake YAMATO <[email protected]> [2012-07-26 01:30:12 +0900]:
>
>> Added /proc/net/sco via bt_procfs_init().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Masatake YAMATO <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> net/bluetooth/sco.c | 9 +++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
>All 8 patches have been applied to bluetooth-next. Thanks.
It may have been raised before, but: should not the info be exported
over netlink rather than the oldfashioned and overabused procfs?