****** Possible race 0 ******
CPU0:
il4965_mac_tx
il4965_tx_skb
line 1687: spin_lock_irqsave(&il->lock, flags)
line 1894: q->write_ptr = il_queue_inc_wrap(...) [WRITE]
CPU1:
il4965_irq_tasklet
il_txq_update_write_ptr
line 2749: il_wr(..., txq->q.write_ptr); [READ]
line 2757: _il_wr(..., txq->q.write_ptr); [READ]
CPU2:
il_bg_watchdog
il_check_stuck_queue
line 4817: if (q->read_ptr == q->write_ptr) [READ]
CPU3:
il4965_irq_tasklet
il4965_rx_handle
line 4827, function pointer: il->handlers[pkt->hdr.cmd] (il, rxb);
il4965_hdl_tx
il_queue_used
line 868: return q->write_ptr >= ... q->write_ptr ...
[READ]
As for q->write_ptr, the WRITE operation in CPU0 is performed with holding
a spinlock il->lock, but the READ operations in CPU1, CPU2 and CPU3
are performed without holding this spinlock, so there may exist data races.
****** Possible race 1 ******
CPU0:
il4965_irq_tasklet
il4965_rx_handle
line 4827, function pointer: il->handlers[pkt->hdr.cmd] (il, rxb);
il4965_hdl_tx
line 2834: spin_lock_irqsave(&il->sta_lock, flags)
il4965_tx_queue_reclaim
line 2490: q->read_ptr = ... [WRITE]
CPU1:
il_bg_watchdog
il_check_stuck_queue
line 4817: q->read_ptr == q->write_ptr [READ]
As for q->read_ptr, the WRITE operation in CPU0 is performed with
holding a spinlock il->sta_lock, but the READ operation in CPU1 is
performed without holding this spinlock, so there may exist a data race.
****** Possible race 2 ******
CPU0:
il4965_mac_tx
il4965_tx_skb
line 1687: spin_lock_irqsave(&il->lock, flags)
line 1863: txq->need_update = 1 [WRITE]
CPU1:
il4965_irq_tasklet
il_txq_update_write_ptr
line 2731: if (txq->need_update == 0) [READ]
As for txq->need_update, the WRITE operation in CPU0 is performed with
holding a spinlock il->lock, but the READ operation in CPU1 is performed
without holding this spinlock, so there may exist a data race.
I do not find good ways to fix these possible data races, so I only
report them.
Best wishes,
Jia-Ju Bai