When I compile kernel in ARM64, it produces the following output:
*** Default configuration is based on 'defconfig'
arch/arm64/configs/defconfig:1018:warning: override: reassigning to
symbol MTK_PMIC_WRAP
After checking defcofnig, I found two CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP options.
Signed-off-by: Luo Longjun <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
index 08c6f769df9a..9907a431db0d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
@@ -491,7 +491,6 @@ CONFIG_SPI_S3C64XX=y
CONFIG_SPI_SH_MSIOF=m
CONFIG_SPI_SUN6I=y
CONFIG_SPI_SPIDEV=m
-CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP=m
CONFIG_SPMI=y
CONFIG_PINCTRL_SINGLE=y
CONFIG_PINCTRL_MAX77620=y
--
2.17.1
On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 02:24:10AM +0800, Luo Longjun wrote:
> When I compile kernel in ARM64, it produces the following output:
>
> *** Default configuration is based on 'defconfig'
> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig:1018:warning: override: reassigning to
> symbol MTK_PMIC_WRAP
>
> After checking defcofnig, I found two CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP options.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luo Longjun <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> index 08c6f769df9a..9907a431db0d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> @@ -491,7 +491,6 @@ CONFIG_SPI_S3C64XX=y
> CONFIG_SPI_SH_MSIOF=m
> CONFIG_SPI_SUN6I=y
> CONFIG_SPI_SPIDEV=m
> -CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP=m
> CONFIG_SPMI=y
> CONFIG_PINCTRL_SINGLE=y
> CONFIG_PINCTRL_MAX77620=y
Adding Matthias and Enric. This change looks fine to me but I think it
should go in via the arm-soc tree. Commit 9fd5449e061e introduced the =m
option while commit fbbe38309d56 introduced the =y variant.
You could add:
Fixes: fbbe38309d56 ("arm64: defconfig: Allow mt8173-based boards to boot from usb")
--
Catalin
Hi Catalin,
Thanks for cc'ing me.
On 11/5/21 19:20, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 02:24:10AM +0800, Luo Longjun wrote:
>> When I compile kernel in ARM64, it produces the following output:
>>
>> *** Default configuration is based on 'defconfig'
>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig:1018:warning: override: reassigning to
>> symbol MTK_PMIC_WRAP
>>
>> After checking defcofnig, I found two CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP options.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luo Longjun <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 -
>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>> index 08c6f769df9a..9907a431db0d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>> @@ -491,7 +491,6 @@ CONFIG_SPI_S3C64XX=y
>> CONFIG_SPI_SH_MSIOF=m
>> CONFIG_SPI_SUN6I=y
>> CONFIG_SPI_SPIDEV=m
>> -CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP=m
>> CONFIG_SPMI=y
>> CONFIG_PINCTRL_SINGLE=y
>> CONFIG_PINCTRL_MAX77620=y
>
> Adding Matthias and Enric. This change looks fine to me but I think it
> should go in via the arm-soc tree. Commit 9fd5449e061e introduced the =m
> option while commit fbbe38309d56 introduced the =y variant.
>
> You could add:
>
> Fixes: fbbe38309d56 ("arm64: defconfig: Allow mt8173-based boards to boot from usb")
>
I sent the same patch some time ago [1].
I agree, either land this patch or mine. In any case,
Reviewed-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]>
Matthias is this something that should go through your tree?
Thanks,
Enric
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/[email protected]/T/
Hi all,
On 11/05/2021 22:04, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> Hi Catalin,
>
> Thanks for cc'ing me.
>
> On 11/5/21 19:20, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 02:24:10AM +0800, Luo Longjun wrote:
>>> When I compile kernel in ARM64, it produces the following output:
>>>
>>> *** Default configuration is based on 'defconfig'
>>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig:1018:warning: override: reassigning to
>>> symbol MTK_PMIC_WRAP
>>>
>>> After checking defcofnig, I found two CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP options.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Luo Longjun <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 -
>>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>>> index 08c6f769df9a..9907a431db0d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>>> @@ -491,7 +491,6 @@ CONFIG_SPI_S3C64XX=y
>>> CONFIG_SPI_SH_MSIOF=m
>>> CONFIG_SPI_SUN6I=y
>>> CONFIG_SPI_SPIDEV=m
>>> -CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP=m
>>> CONFIG_SPMI=y
>>> CONFIG_PINCTRL_SINGLE=y
>>> CONFIG_PINCTRL_MAX77620=y
>>
>> Adding Matthias and Enric. This change looks fine to me but I think it
>> should go in via the arm-soc tree. Commit 9fd5449e061e introduced the =m
>> option while commit fbbe38309d56 introduced the =y variant.
>>
>> You could add:
>>
>> Fixes: fbbe38309d56 ("arm64: defconfig: Allow mt8173-based boards to boot from usb")
>>
>
> I sent the same patch some time ago [1].
>
> I agree, either land this patch or mine. In any case,
>
> Reviewed-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]>
>
> Matthias is this something that should go through your tree?
>
Yes, this should go through my tree. I'll take care of it.
Regards,
Matthias
Hi,
> Hi all,
> On 11/05/2021 22:04, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> > Hi Catalin,
> > Thanks for cc'ing me.
> > On 11/5/21 19:20, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 02:24:10AM +0800, Luo Longjun wrote:
> >>> When I compile kernel in ARM64, it produces the following output:
> >>> *** Default configuration is based on 'defconfig'
> >>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig:1018:warning: override: reassigning to
> >>> symbol MTK_PMIC_WRAP
> >>> After checking defcofnig, I found two CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP options.
> >>> Signed-off-by: Luo Longjun <[email protected]>
> >>> ---
> >>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 -
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> >>> index 08c6f769df9a..9907a431db0d 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> >>> @@ -491,7 +491,6 @@ CONFIG_SPI_S3C64XX=y
> >>> CONFIG_SPI_SH_MSIOF=m
> >>> CONFIG_SPI_SUN6I=y
> >>> CONFIG_SPI_SPIDEV=m
> >>> -CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP=m
> >>> CONFIG_SPMI=y
> >>> CONFIG_PINCTRL_SINGLE=y
> >>> CONFIG_PINCTRL_MAX77620=y
> >> Adding Matthias and Enric. This change looks fine to me but I think it
> >> should go in via the arm-soc tree. Commit 9fd5449e061e introduced the =m
> >> option while commit fbbe38309d56 introduced the =y variant.
> >> You could add:
> >> Fixes: fbbe38309d56 ("arm64: defconfig: Allow mt8173-based boards to boot from usb")
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <[email protected]>
I was going to send fix myself, I'd prefer also y, but weren't 100% sure sure.
For a record:
* CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP=m committed by author in 2021-01-04, merged 2021-01-31 15:31:01
9fd5449e061e ("arm64: configs: Support pwrap on Mediatek MT6779 platform")
sent: 4 Jan 2021
https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Applied to v5.11-next/defconfig 31 Jan 2021 15:32:26 by Matthias Brugger <[email protected]>
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/[email protected]/
* CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP=y was committed by author in 2021-03-31 11:06:57, merged 2021-03-31 12:12:59
fbbe38309d56 ("arm64: defconfig: Allow mt8173-based boards to boot from usb")
sent: 31 Mar 2021 11:06:57
https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
But originally sent: 9 Feb 2021 10:11:11
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
Kind regards,
Petr
> > I sent the same patch some time ago [1].
> > I agree, either land this patch or mine. In any case,
> > Reviewed-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]>
> > Matthias is this something that should go through your tree?
> Yes, this should go through my tree. I'll take care of it.
> Regards,
> Matthias
Hi Petr,
On 11/06/2021 23:39, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Hi all,
>
>> On 11/05/2021 22:04, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
>>> Hi Catalin,
>
>>> Thanks for cc'ing me.
>
>>> On 11/5/21 19:20, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>>> On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 02:24:10AM +0800, Luo Longjun wrote:
>>>>> When I compile kernel in ARM64, it produces the following output:
>
>>>>> *** Default configuration is based on 'defconfig'
>>>>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig:1018:warning: override: reassigning to
>>>>> symbol MTK_PMIC_WRAP
>
>>>>> After checking defcofnig, I found two CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP options.
>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Luo Longjun <[email protected]>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 -
>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>>>>> index 08c6f769df9a..9907a431db0d 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>>>>> @@ -491,7 +491,6 @@ CONFIG_SPI_S3C64XX=y
>>>>> CONFIG_SPI_SH_MSIOF=m
>>>>> CONFIG_SPI_SUN6I=y
>>>>> CONFIG_SPI_SPIDEV=m
>>>>> -CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP=m
>>>>> CONFIG_SPMI=y
>>>>> CONFIG_PINCTRL_SINGLE=y
>>>>> CONFIG_PINCTRL_MAX77620=y
>
>>>> Adding Matthias and Enric. This change looks fine to me but I think it
>>>> should go in via the arm-soc tree. Commit 9fd5449e061e introduced the =m
>>>> option while commit fbbe38309d56 introduced the =y variant.
>
>>>> You could add:
>
>>>> Fixes: fbbe38309d56 ("arm64: defconfig: Allow mt8173-based boards to boot from usb")
>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <[email protected]>
>
> I was going to send fix myself, I'd prefer also y, but weren't 100% sure sure.
>
This has landed in the arm-soc tree this weekend.
Anyway, thanks for looking into this as well.
Regards,
Matthias
> For a record:
>
> * CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP=m committed by author in 2021-01-04, merged 2021-01-31 15:31:01
> 9fd5449e061e ("arm64: configs: Support pwrap on Mediatek MT6779 platform")
> sent: 4 Jan 2021
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> Applied to v5.11-next/defconfig 31 Jan 2021 15:32:26 by Matthias Brugger <[email protected]>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/[email protected]/
>
> * CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP=y was committed by author in 2021-03-31 11:06:57, merged 2021-03-31 12:12:59
> fbbe38309d56 ("arm64: defconfig: Allow mt8173-based boards to boot from usb")
> sent: 31 Mar 2021 11:06:57
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> But originally sent: 9 Feb 2021 10:11:11
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
>
> Kind regards,
> Petr
>
>>> I sent the same patch some time ago [1].
>
>>> I agree, either land this patch or mine. In any case,
>
>>> Reviewed-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]>
>
>>> Matthias is this something that should go through your tree?
>
>
>> Yes, this should go through my tree. I'll take care of it.
>
>> Regards,
>> Matthias