Hello!
The tiglusb-driver was removed in 2.6.11-rc1.
Since then, references to it in other files have been kept, namely the
following files:
Documentation/usb/silverlink.txt,
Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
MAINTAINERS
This series of patches removes the silverlink.txt-documentation, and
tiglusb-references in MAINTAINERS and kernel-parameters.txt.
The patches are diffed against 2.6.11-rc2-bk4.
Thanks,
Mikkel Krautz
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 05:27:46PM +0100, Mikkel Krautz wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:04:29 +0100, Mikkel Krautz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > The tiglusb-driver was removed in 2.6.11-rc1.
> >
> > Since then, references to it in other files have been kept, namely the
> > following files:
> >
> > Documentation/usb/silverlink.txt,
> > Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > MAINTAINERS
> >
> > This series of patches removes the silverlink.txt-documentation, and
> > tiglusb-references in MAINTAINERS and kernel-parameters.txt.
> >
> > The patches are diffed against 2.6.11-rc2-bk4.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mikkel Krautz
> >
>
> Hurrah!
>
> All the patches were word-wrapped by Thunderbird, even though I disabled it.
>
> I'm sorry, but this is all I can do for now. Sigh.
Use a different email client, or attach the patches as plain text.
Good luck,
greg k-h
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:04:29 +0100, Mikkel Krautz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> The tiglusb-driver was removed in 2.6.11-rc1.
>
> Since then, references to it in other files have been kept, namely the
> following files:
>
> Documentation/usb/silverlink.txt,
> Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> MAINTAINERS
>
> This series of patches removes the silverlink.txt-documentation, and
> tiglusb-references in MAINTAINERS and kernel-parameters.txt.
>
> The patches are diffed against 2.6.11-rc2-bk4.
>
> Thanks,
> Mikkel Krautz
>
Hurrah!
All the patches were word-wrapped by Thunderbird, even though I disabled it.
I'm sorry, but this is all I can do for now. Sigh.
Thanks,
Mikkel Krautz
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 05:48:19PM +0100, Mikkel Krautz wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:40:10 -0800, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Use a different email client, or attach the patches as plain text.
> >
> > Good luck,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
>
> Alright, they're attached this time.
> I hope this'll do for now. :-)
Nope, please break them out into the three pieces, in three different
emails like you did before so I can apply them all properly.
thanks,
greg k-h
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:40:10 -0800, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Use a different email client, or attach the patches as plain text.
>
> Good luck,
>
> greg k-h
>
Alright, they're attached this time.
I hope this'll do for now. :-)
Mikkel Krautz
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:57:07 -0800, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 05:48:19PM +0100, Mikkel Krautz wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:40:10 -0800, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Use a different email client, or attach the patches as plain text.
> > >
> > > Good luck,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> > >
> >
> > Alright, they're attached this time.
> > I hope this'll do for now. :-)
>
> Nope, please break them out into the three pieces, in three different
> emails like you did before so I can apply them all properly.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Should I add "[RESEND]" or something simmilar to the subjects, so they
can be easily distinguished from the original ones?
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 06:01:28PM +0100, Mikkel Krautz wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:57:07 -0800, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 05:48:19PM +0100, Mikkel Krautz wrote:
> > > On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:40:10 -0800, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Use a different email client, or attach the patches as plain text.
> > > >
> > > > Good luck,
> > > >
> > > > greg k-h
> > > >
> > >
> > > Alright, they're attached this time.
> > > I hope this'll do for now. :-)
> >
> > Nope, please break them out into the three pieces, in three different
> > emails like you did before so I can apply them all properly.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
>
> Should I add "[RESEND]" or something simmilar to the subjects, so they
> can be easily distinguished from the original ones?
Nah, just send them again, I can distinguish them by the fact that they
can actually be applied :)
thanks,
greg k-h