It can be found that platform_get_irq() returns nagative code but not
null when fails.
The comment of the platform_get_irq clearly shows that.
Therefore it should be better to remove the useless check.
Fixes: fd990556f0fa ("ata: move library code from ahci_platform.c to libahci_platform.c")
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <[email protected]>
---
drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c
index b2f552088291..5ec68f138c28 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c
@@ -587,8 +587,6 @@ int ahci_platform_init_host(struct platform_device *pdev,
dev_err(dev, "no irq\n");
return irq;
}
- if (!irq)
- return -EINVAL;
hpriv->irq = irq;
--
2.25.1
On 12/22/21 16:24, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
> It can be found that platform_get_irq() returns nagative code but not
> null when fails.
> The comment of the platform_get_irq clearly shows that.
> Therefore it should be better to remove the useless check.
Nope, platform_get_irq() can actually return 0 (the comment for that
function is wrong). So testing for !irq is valid and must be kept.
>
> Fixes: fd990556f0fa ("ata: move library code from ahci_platform.c to libahci_platform.c")
> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c
> index b2f552088291..5ec68f138c28 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c
> @@ -587,8 +587,6 @@ int ahci_platform_init_host(struct platform_device *pdev,
> dev_err(dev, "no irq\n");
> return irq;
> }
> - if (!irq)
> - return -EINVAL;
>
> hpriv->irq = irq;
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
On 12/22/21 16:24, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
> It can be found that platform_get_irq() returns nagative code but not
> null when fails.
> The comment of the platform_get_irq clearly shows that.
> Therefore it should be better to remove the useless check.
>
> Fixes: fd990556f0fa ("ata: move library code from ahci_platform.c to libahci_platform.c")
> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <[email protected]>
Another note: please use scripts/get_maintainer.pl to see to whom you
should address patches. This one was not addressed to me.
> ---
> drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c
> index b2f552088291..5ec68f138c28 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c
> @@ -587,8 +587,6 @@ int ahci_platform_init_host(struct platform_device *pdev,
> dev_err(dev, "no irq\n");
> return irq;
> }
> - if (!irq)
> - return -EINVAL;
>
> hpriv->irq = irq;
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Hello!
On 22.12.2021 10:24, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
> It can be found that platform_get_irq() returns nagative code but not
> null when fails.
s/null/zero/?
> The comment of the platform_get_irq clearly shows that.
This comment still doesn't correspond to reality -- 0 can be returned
(although this would cause a WARN() call)...
> Therefore it should be better to remove the useless check.
This patch is correct but premature. I have a (not yet merged) patch:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=163623041902285
It actually disables reporting IRQ0. Until it's merged we have to filter
out IRQ0 in the libata drivers as libata treats 0 as an indication of the
polling mode...
> Fixes: fd990556f0fa ("ata: move library code from ahci_platform.c to libahci_platform.c")
> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <[email protected]>
[...]
MBR, Sergey