The drm_client_buffer_delete() wasn't switched to unlocked GEM vunmapping
by accident when rest of drm_client code transitioned to the unlocked
variants of the vmapping functions. Make drm_client_buffer_delete() use
the unlocked variant. This fixes lockdep warning splat about missing
reservation lock when framebuffer is released.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/[email protected]/T/
Fixes: 79e2cf2e7a19 ("drm/gem: Take reservation lock for vmap/vunmap operations")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c
index fbcb1e995384..38e1be991caa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static void drm_client_buffer_delete(struct drm_client_buffer *buffer)
{
struct drm_device *dev = buffer->client->dev;
- drm_gem_vunmap(buffer->gem, &buffer->map);
+ drm_gem_vunmap_unlocked(buffer->gem, &buffer->map);
if (buffer->gem)
drm_gem_object_put(buffer->gem);
--
2.37.3
Hello,
On 10/21/22 00:33, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> The drm_client_buffer_delete() wasn't switched to unlocked GEM vunmapping
> by accident when rest of drm_client code transitioned to the unlocked
> variants of the vmapping functions. Make drm_client_buffer_delete() use
> the unlocked variant. This fixes lockdep warning splat about missing
> reservation lock when framebuffer is released.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/[email protected]/T/
> Fixes: 79e2cf2e7a19 ("drm/gem: Take reservation lock for vmap/vunmap operations")
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c
> index fbcb1e995384..38e1be991caa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c
> @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static void drm_client_buffer_delete(struct drm_client_buffer *buffer)
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = buffer->client->dev;
>
> - drm_gem_vunmap(buffer->gem, &buffer->map);
> + drm_gem_vunmap_unlocked(buffer->gem, &buffer->map);
>
> if (buffer->gem)
> drm_gem_object_put(buffer->gem);
Christian, could you please give yours r-b? The dim insists that the
patch should have r-b or it won't let me push to misc-next. Thanks in
advance!
--
Best regards,
Dmitry
Am 20.10.22 um 23:33 schrieb Dmitry Osipenko:
> The drm_client_buffer_delete() wasn't switched to unlocked GEM vunmapping
> by accident when rest of drm_client code transitioned to the unlocked
> variants of the vmapping functions. Make drm_client_buffer_delete() use
> the unlocked variant. This fixes lockdep warning splat about missing
> reservation lock when framebuffer is released.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/[email protected]/T/
> Fixes: 79e2cf2e7a19 ("drm/gem: Take reservation lock for vmap/vunmap operations")
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>
The code was properly added recently between review and pushing. Let's
get that upstream ASAP.
Acked-by: Christian König <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c
> index fbcb1e995384..38e1be991caa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c
> @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static void drm_client_buffer_delete(struct drm_client_buffer *buffer)
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = buffer->client->dev;
>
> - drm_gem_vunmap(buffer->gem, &buffer->map);
> + drm_gem_vunmap_unlocked(buffer->gem, &buffer->map);
>
> if (buffer->gem)
> drm_gem_object_put(buffer->gem);
On 10/21/22 00:33, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> The drm_client_buffer_delete() wasn't switched to unlocked GEM vunmapping
> by accident when rest of drm_client code transitioned to the unlocked
> variants of the vmapping functions. Make drm_client_buffer_delete() use
> the unlocked variant. This fixes lockdep warning splat about missing
> reservation lock when framebuffer is released.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/[email protected]/T/
> Fixes: 79e2cf2e7a19 ("drm/gem: Take reservation lock for vmap/vunmap operations")
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c
> index fbcb1e995384..38e1be991caa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c
> @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static void drm_client_buffer_delete(struct drm_client_buffer *buffer)
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = buffer->client->dev;
>
> - drm_gem_vunmap(buffer->gem, &buffer->map);
> + drm_gem_vunmap_unlocked(buffer->gem, &buffer->map);
>
> if (buffer->gem)
> drm_gem_object_put(buffer->gem);
Applied to misc-next
--
Best regards,
Dmitry