2020-03-30 20:00:37

by Joe Perches

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH] mtd: lpddr: Fix bad logic in print_drs_error

Update logic for broken test.
Use a more common logging style.

Miscellanea:

o Coalesce formats

Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
---

Found by inspection of include files using printk.

It appears the logic in this function is broken for the
consecutive tests of

if (prog_status & 0x3)
...
else if (prog_status & 0x2)
...
else (prog_status & 0x1)
...

Likely the first test should be

if ((prog_status & 0x3) == 0x3)

And this function is only used in drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c
perhaps it should be moved there.

include/linux/mtd/pfow.h | 31 ++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/pfow.h b/include/linux/mtd/pfow.h
index 122f343..1c08e75 100644
--- a/include/linux/mtd/pfow.h
+++ b/include/linux/mtd/pfow.h
@@ -127,31 +127,28 @@ static inline void print_drs_error(unsigned dsr)
int prog_status = (dsr & DSR_RPS) >> 8;

if (!(dsr & DSR_AVAILABLE))
- printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.15: (0) Device not Available\n");
- if (prog_status & 0x03)
- printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.9,8: (11) Attempt to program invalid "
- "half with 41h command\n");
+ pr_notice("DSR.15: (0) Device not Available\n");
+
+ if ((prog_status & 0x03) == 0x03)
+ pr_notice("DSR.9,8: (11) Attempt to program invalid half with 41h command\n");
else if (prog_status & 0x02)
- printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.9,8: (10) Object Mode Program attempt "
- "in region with Control Mode data\n");
+ pr_notice("DSR.9,8: (10) Object Mode Program attempt in region with Control Mode data\n");
else if (prog_status & 0x01)
- printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.9,8: (01) Program attempt in region "
- "with Object Mode data\n");
+ pr_notice("DSR.9,8: (01) Program attempt in region with Object Mode data\n");
+
if (!(dsr & DSR_READY_STATUS))
- printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.7: (0) Device is Busy\n");
+ pr_notice("DSR.7: (0) Device is Busy\n");
if (dsr & DSR_ESS)
- printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.6: (1) Erase Suspended\n");
+ pr_notice("DSR.6: (1) Erase Suspended\n");
if (dsr & DSR_ERASE_STATUS)
- printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.5: (1) Erase/Blank check error\n");
+ pr_notice("DSR.5: (1) Erase/Blank check error\n");
if (dsr & DSR_PROGRAM_STATUS)
- printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.4: (1) Program Error\n");
+ pr_notice("DSR.4: (1) Program Error\n");
if (dsr & DSR_VPPS)
- printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.3: (1) Vpp low detect, operation "
- "aborted\n");
+ pr_notice("DSR.3: (1) Vpp low detect, operation aborted\n");
if (dsr & DSR_PSS)
- printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.2: (1) Program suspended\n");
+ pr_notice("DSR.2: (1) Program suspended\n");
if (dsr & DSR_DPS)
- printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.1: (1) Aborted Erase/Program attempt "
- "on locked block\n");
+ pr_notice("DSR.1: (1) Aborted Erase/Program attempt on locked block\n");
}
#endif /* __LINUX_MTD_PFOW_H */



2020-04-27 13:31:55

by Miquel Raynal

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mtd: lpddr: Fix bad logic in print_drs_error

Hi Joe,

Joe Perches <[email protected]> wrote on Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:56:59 -0700:

> Update logic for broken test.
> Use a more common logging style.
>
> Miscellanea:
>
> o Coalesce formats
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Found by inspection of include files using printk.
>
> It appears the logic in this function is broken for the
> consecutive tests of
>
> if (prog_status & 0x3)
> ...
> else if (prog_status & 0x2)
> ...
> else (prog_status & 0x1)
> ...
>
> Likely the first test should be
>
> if ((prog_status & 0x3) == 0x3)

I had a hard time understanding the patch just with the commit log, I
think the above text is as important.

In fact, would you mind doing the printk->pr_notice in a first patch,
and fix the wrong condition in a separate change?

>
> And this function is only used in drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c
> perhaps it should be moved there.

Agreed, do not hesitate to move the function as suggested in a third
patch.

>
> include/linux/mtd/pfow.h | 31 ++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/pfow.h b/include/linux/mtd/pfow.h
> index 122f343..1c08e75 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/pfow.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/pfow.h
> @@ -127,31 +127,28 @@ static inline void print_drs_error(unsigned dsr)
> int prog_status = (dsr & DSR_RPS) >> 8;
>
> if (!(dsr & DSR_AVAILABLE))
> - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.15: (0) Device not Available\n");
> - if (prog_status & 0x03)
> - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.9,8: (11) Attempt to program invalid "
> - "half with 41h command\n");
> + pr_notice("DSR.15: (0) Device not Available\n");
> +
> + if ((prog_status & 0x03) == 0x03)
> + pr_notice("DSR.9,8: (11) Attempt to program invalid half with 41h command\n");
> else if (prog_status & 0x02)
> - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.9,8: (10) Object Mode Program attempt "
> - "in region with Control Mode data\n");
> + pr_notice("DSR.9,8: (10) Object Mode Program attempt in region with Control Mode data\n");
> else if (prog_status & 0x01)
> - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.9,8: (01) Program attempt in region "
> - "with Object Mode data\n");
> + pr_notice("DSR.9,8: (01) Program attempt in region with Object Mode data\n");
> +
> if (!(dsr & DSR_READY_STATUS))
> - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.7: (0) Device is Busy\n");
> + pr_notice("DSR.7: (0) Device is Busy\n");
> if (dsr & DSR_ESS)
> - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.6: (1) Erase Suspended\n");
> + pr_notice("DSR.6: (1) Erase Suspended\n");
> if (dsr & DSR_ERASE_STATUS)
> - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.5: (1) Erase/Blank check error\n");
> + pr_notice("DSR.5: (1) Erase/Blank check error\n");
> if (dsr & DSR_PROGRAM_STATUS)
> - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.4: (1) Program Error\n");
> + pr_notice("DSR.4: (1) Program Error\n");
> if (dsr & DSR_VPPS)
> - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.3: (1) Vpp low detect, operation "
> - "aborted\n");
> + pr_notice("DSR.3: (1) Vpp low detect, operation aborted\n");
> if (dsr & DSR_PSS)
> - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.2: (1) Program suspended\n");
> + pr_notice("DSR.2: (1) Program suspended\n");
> if (dsr & DSR_DPS)
> - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.1: (1) Aborted Erase/Program attempt "
> - "on locked block\n");
> + pr_notice("DSR.1: (1) Aborted Erase/Program attempt on locked block\n");
> }
> #endif /* __LINUX_MTD_PFOW_H */
>
>

Thanks,
Miquèl

2020-04-27 17:34:56

by Joe Perches

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mtd: lpddr: Fix bad logic in print_drs_error

On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 15:29 +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Joe,

Hello Miquel.

> Joe Perches <[email protected]> wrote on Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:56:59 -0700:
>
> > Update logic for broken test.
> > Use a more common logging style.
> >
> > Miscellanea:
> >
> > o Coalesce formats
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >
> > Found by inspection of include files using printk.
> >
> > It appears the logic in this function is broken for the
> > consecutive tests of
> >
> > if (prog_status & 0x3)
> > ...
> > else if (prog_status & 0x2)
> > ...
> > else (prog_status & 0x1)
> > ...
> >
> > Likely the first test should be
> >
> > if ((prog_status & 0x3) == 0x3)
>
> I had a hard time understanding the patch just with the commit log, I
> think the above text is as important.
>
> In fact, would you mind doing the printk->pr_notice in a first patch,
> and fix the wrong condition in a separate change?
>
> > And this function is only used in drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c
> > perhaps it should be moved there.
>
> Agreed, do not hesitate to move the function as suggested in a third
> patch.

You are the maintainer here no?

I think you (or perhaps the author Alexey Korolev but he hasn't
been active in a decade) should be doing all this.

I just identified the logic defect.

> > include/linux/mtd/pfow.h | 31 ++++++++++++++-----------------
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/pfow.h b/include/linux/mtd/pfow.h
> > index 122f343..1c08e75 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mtd/pfow.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mtd/pfow.h
> > @@ -127,31 +127,28 @@ static inline void print_drs_error(unsigned dsr)
> > int prog_status = (dsr & DSR_RPS) >> 8;
> >
> > if (!(dsr & DSR_AVAILABLE))
> > - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.15: (0) Device not Available\n");
> > - if (prog_status & 0x03)
> > - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.9,8: (11) Attempt to program invalid "
> > - "half with 41h command\n");
> > + pr_notice("DSR.15: (0) Device not Available\n");
> > +
> > + if ((prog_status & 0x03) == 0x03)
> > + pr_notice("DSR.9,8: (11) Attempt to program invalid half with 41h command\n");
> > else if (prog_status & 0x02)
> > - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.9,8: (10) Object Mode Program attempt "
> > - "in region with Control Mode data\n");
> > + pr_notice("DSR.9,8: (10) Object Mode Program attempt in region with Control Mode data\n");
> > else if (prog_status & 0x01)
> > - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.9,8: (01) Program attempt in region "
> > - "with Object Mode data\n");
> > + pr_notice("DSR.9,8: (01) Program attempt in region with Object Mode data\n");
> > +
> > if (!(dsr & DSR_READY_STATUS))
> > - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.7: (0) Device is Busy\n");
> > + pr_notice("DSR.7: (0) Device is Busy\n");
> > if (dsr & DSR_ESS)
> > - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.6: (1) Erase Suspended\n");
> > + pr_notice("DSR.6: (1) Erase Suspended\n");
> > if (dsr & DSR_ERASE_STATUS)
> > - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.5: (1) Erase/Blank check error\n");
> > + pr_notice("DSR.5: (1) Erase/Blank check error\n");
> > if (dsr & DSR_PROGRAM_STATUS)
> > - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.4: (1) Program Error\n");
> > + pr_notice("DSR.4: (1) Program Error\n");
> > if (dsr & DSR_VPPS)
> > - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.3: (1) Vpp low detect, operation "
> > - "aborted\n");
> > + pr_notice("DSR.3: (1) Vpp low detect, operation aborted\n");
> > if (dsr & DSR_PSS)
> > - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.2: (1) Program suspended\n");
> > + pr_notice("DSR.2: (1) Program suspended\n");
> > if (dsr & DSR_DPS)
> > - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.1: (1) Aborted Erase/Program attempt "
> > - "on locked block\n");
> > + pr_notice("DSR.1: (1) Aborted Erase/Program attempt on locked block\n");
> > }
> > #endif /* __LINUX_MTD_PFOW_H */
> >
> >
>
> Thanks,
> Miqu?l

2020-04-27 18:29:53

by Gustavo A. R. Silva

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mtd: lpddr: Fix bad logic in print_drs_error

Hi,

It seems that this fix should be tagged for -stable.

I can create a three-patch series for this (as Miquel suggested), starting
with the patch that fix the wrong condition, so it can be ported to
-stable, separately.

I'll include you Reported-by, Joe.

Thanks
--
Gustavo

On 4/27/20 12:33, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 15:29 +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>> Hi Joe,
>
> Hello Miquel.
>
>> Joe Perches <[email protected]> wrote on Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:56:59 -0700:
>>
>>> Update logic for broken test.
>>> Use a more common logging style.
>>>
>>> Miscellanea:
>>>
>>> o Coalesce formats
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Found by inspection of include files using printk.
>>>
>>> It appears the logic in this function is broken for the
>>> consecutive tests of
>>>
>>> if (prog_status & 0x3)
>>> ...
>>> else if (prog_status & 0x2)
>>> ...
>>> else (prog_status & 0x1)
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Likely the first test should be
>>>
>>> if ((prog_status & 0x3) == 0x3)
>>
>> I had a hard time understanding the patch just with the commit log, I
>> think the above text is as important.
>>
>> In fact, would you mind doing the printk->pr_notice in a first patch,
>> and fix the wrong condition in a separate change?
>>
>>> And this function is only used in drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c
>>> perhaps it should be moved there.
>>
>> Agreed, do not hesitate to move the function as suggested in a third
>> patch.
>
> You are the maintainer here no?
>
> I think you (or perhaps the author Alexey Korolev but he hasn't
> been active in a decade) should be doing all this.
>
> I just identified the logic defect.
>
>>> include/linux/mtd/pfow.h | 31 ++++++++++++++-----------------
>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/pfow.h b/include/linux/mtd/pfow.h
>>> index 122f343..1c08e75 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/mtd/pfow.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/pfow.h
>>> @@ -127,31 +127,28 @@ static inline void print_drs_error(unsigned dsr)
>>> int prog_status = (dsr & DSR_RPS) >> 8;
>>>
>>> if (!(dsr & DSR_AVAILABLE))
>>> - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.15: (0) Device not Available\n");
>>> - if (prog_status & 0x03)
>>> - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.9,8: (11) Attempt to program invalid "
>>> - "half with 41h command\n");
>>> + pr_notice("DSR.15: (0) Device not Available\n");
>>> +
>>> + if ((prog_status & 0x03) == 0x03)
>>> + pr_notice("DSR.9,8: (11) Attempt to program invalid half with 41h command\n");
>>> else if (prog_status & 0x02)
>>> - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.9,8: (10) Object Mode Program attempt "
>>> - "in region with Control Mode data\n");
>>> + pr_notice("DSR.9,8: (10) Object Mode Program attempt in region with Control Mode data\n");
>>> else if (prog_status & 0x01)
>>> - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.9,8: (01) Program attempt in region "
>>> - "with Object Mode data\n");
>>> + pr_notice("DSR.9,8: (01) Program attempt in region with Object Mode data\n");
>>> +
>>> if (!(dsr & DSR_READY_STATUS))
>>> - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.7: (0) Device is Busy\n");
>>> + pr_notice("DSR.7: (0) Device is Busy\n");
>>> if (dsr & DSR_ESS)
>>> - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.6: (1) Erase Suspended\n");
>>> + pr_notice("DSR.6: (1) Erase Suspended\n");
>>> if (dsr & DSR_ERASE_STATUS)
>>> - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.5: (1) Erase/Blank check error\n");
>>> + pr_notice("DSR.5: (1) Erase/Blank check error\n");
>>> if (dsr & DSR_PROGRAM_STATUS)
>>> - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.4: (1) Program Error\n");
>>> + pr_notice("DSR.4: (1) Program Error\n");
>>> if (dsr & DSR_VPPS)
>>> - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.3: (1) Vpp low detect, operation "
>>> - "aborted\n");
>>> + pr_notice("DSR.3: (1) Vpp low detect, operation aborted\n");
>>> if (dsr & DSR_PSS)
>>> - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.2: (1) Program suspended\n");
>>> + pr_notice("DSR.2: (1) Program suspended\n");
>>> if (dsr & DSR_DPS)
>>> - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.1: (1) Aborted Erase/Program attempt "
>>> - "on locked block\n");
>>> + pr_notice("DSR.1: (1) Aborted Erase/Program attempt on locked block\n");
>>> }
>>> #endif /* __LINUX_MTD_PFOW_H */
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Miquèl
>