2022-06-22 04:12:42

by Bjorn Andersson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document additional sc8280xp devices

Add the CRD (Customer Reference Design?) and the Lenovo Thinkpad X13s to
the valid device compatibles found on the sc8280xp platform.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
---

Changes since v1:
- Added the two missing board compatibles

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
index 5c06d1bfc046..6ec7521be19d 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
@@ -238,6 +238,8 @@ properties:

- items:
- enum:
+ - lenovo,thinkpad-x13s
+ - qcom,sc8280xp-crd
- qcom,sc8280xp-qrd
- const: qcom,sc8280xp

--
2.35.1


2022-06-22 09:03:39

by Johan Hovold

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document additional sc8280xp devices

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 09:12:19PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> Add the CRD (Customer Reference Design?) and the Lenovo Thinkpad X13s to

Qualcomm refers to "Compute Reference Design", for example, in commit
427b249504ea ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280-crd: Add device tree files for
CRD").

> the valid device compatibles found on the sc8280xp platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Added the two missing board compatibles
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> index 5c06d1bfc046..6ec7521be19d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> @@ -238,6 +238,8 @@ properties:
>
> - items:
> - enum:
> + - lenovo,thinkpad-x13s
> + - qcom,sc8280xp-crd
> - qcom,sc8280xp-qrd

I believe the "qcom,sc8280xp-qrd" entry was a mistake and should have
been "-crd" all along? Perhaps you should remove that entry in this
patch.

> - const: qcom,sc8280xp

Looks good otherwise:

Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <[email protected]>

Johan

2022-06-22 14:27:20

by Krzysztof Kozlowski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document additional sc8280xp devices

On 22/06/2022 06:12, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> Add the CRD (Customer Reference Design?) and the Lenovo Thinkpad X13s to
> the valid device compatibles found on the sc8280xp platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>


Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>


Best regards,
Krzysztof

2022-06-22 21:26:55

by Bjorn Andersson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document additional sc8280xp devices

On Wed 22 Jun 03:47 CDT 2022, Johan Hovold wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 09:12:19PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > Add the CRD (Customer Reference Design?) and the Lenovo Thinkpad X13s to
>
> Qualcomm refers to "Compute Reference Design", for example, in commit
> 427b249504ea ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280-crd: Add device tree files for
> CRD").
>

I'll align with that expansion of the abbreviation, thanks.

> > the valid device compatibles found on the sc8280xp platform.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Added the two missing board compatibles
> >
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> > index 5c06d1bfc046..6ec7521be19d 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> > @@ -238,6 +238,8 @@ properties:
> >
> > - items:
> > - enum:
> > + - lenovo,thinkpad-x13s
> > + - qcom,sc8280xp-crd
> > - qcom,sc8280xp-qrd
>
> I believe the "qcom,sc8280xp-qrd" entry was a mistake and should have
> been "-crd" all along? Perhaps you should remove that entry in this
> patch.

It was a mistake on my part adding the QRD when apparently I had a CRD,
but I still believe both exists, so I'd prefer to just keep them around.

Regards,
Bjorn

>
> > - const: qcom,sc8280xp
>
> Looks good otherwise:
>
> Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <[email protected]>
>
> Johan