From: Patrick Rudolph <[email protected]>
MPS returns PGOOD instead of PB_STATUS_POWER_GOOD_N.
Fix that in the read_word_data hook.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <[email protected]>
---
drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c
index 28f33f4618fa..410b6eae6d02 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c
@@ -297,6 +297,10 @@ static int mp2973_read_word_data(struct i2c_client *client, int page,
int ret;
switch (reg) {
+ case PMBUS_STATUS_WORD:
+ ret = pmbus_read_word_data(client, page, phase, reg);
+ ret ^= PB_STATUS_POWER_GOOD_N;
+ break;
case PMBUS_OT_FAULT_LIMIT:
ret = mp2975_read_word_helper(client, page, phase, reg,
GENMASK(7, 0));
base-commit: a4bb1ce5b9e3ca403c04e20ebeae77fd6447cb11
--
2.41.0
On 7/28/23 01:25, Naresh Solanki wrote:
> From: Patrick Rudolph <[email protected]>
>
> MPS returns PGOOD instead of PB_STATUS_POWER_GOOD_N.
> Fix that in the read_word_data hook.
>
Datasheets are not public, so I can not verify, but the code below
only handles MP2973 and MP2971. What about MP2975 ?
Either case, this appears to affect most Monolithic chips, but
not all of them. Please limit the statement to known to be affected
chips.
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c
> index 28f33f4618fa..410b6eae6d02 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c
> @@ -297,6 +297,10 @@ static int mp2973_read_word_data(struct i2c_client *client, int page,
> int ret;
>
> switch (reg) {
> + case PMBUS_STATUS_WORD:
> + ret = pmbus_read_word_data(client, page, phase, reg);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
Please add a comment explaining what is going on.
> + ret ^= PB_STATUS_POWER_GOOD_N;
> + break;
> case PMBUS_OT_FAULT_LIMIT:
> ret = mp2975_read_word_helper(client, page, phase, reg,
> GENMASK(7, 0));
>
> base-commit: a4bb1ce5b9e3ca403c04e20ebeae77fd6447cb11
Hi Guenter,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 at 15:30, Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 7/28/23 01:25, Naresh Solanki wrote:
> > From: Patrick Rudolph <[email protected]>
> >
> > MPS returns PGOOD instead of PB_STATUS_POWER_GOOD_N.
> > Fix that in the read_word_data hook.
> >
> Datasheets are not public, so I can not verify, but the code below
> only handles MP2973 and MP2971. What about MP2975 ?
I dont have MP2975 to even verify. I'm not sure if its applicable.
>
> Either case, this appears to affect most Monolithic chips, but
> not all of them. Please limit the statement to known to be affected
> chips.
Yes. With what we observed, this affects mp2973 & mp2971.
Will update accordingly.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c
> > index 28f33f4618fa..410b6eae6d02 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c
> > @@ -297,6 +297,10 @@ static int mp2973_read_word_data(struct i2c_client *client, int page,
> > int ret;
> >
> > switch (reg) {
> > + case PMBUS_STATUS_WORD:
> > + ret = pmbus_read_word_data(client, page, phase, reg);
>
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> Please add a comment explaining what is going on.
Sure.
>
> > + ret ^= PB_STATUS_POWER_GOOD_N;
> > + break;
> > case PMBUS_OT_FAULT_LIMIT:
> > ret = mp2975_read_word_helper(client, page, phase, reg,
> > GENMASK(7, 0));
> >
> > base-commit: a4bb1ce5b9e3ca403c04e20ebeae77fd6447cb11
>
On 7/28/23 04:28, Naresh Solanki wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
>
> On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 at 15:30, Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 7/28/23 01:25, Naresh Solanki wrote:
>>> From: Patrick Rudolph <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> MPS returns PGOOD instead of PB_STATUS_POWER_GOOD_N.
>>> Fix that in the read_word_data hook.
>>>
>> Datasheets are not public, so I can not verify, but the code below
>> only handles MP2973 and MP2971. What about MP2975 ?
> I dont have MP2975 to even verify. I'm not sure if its applicable.
Maybe Vadim can check / confirm.
Guenter
>>
>> Either case, this appears to affect most Monolithic chips, but
>> not all of them. Please limit the statement to known to be affected
>> chips.
> Yes. With what we observed, this affects mp2973 & mp2971.
> Will update accordingly.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <[email protected]>
>>> Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c | 4 ++++
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c
>>> index 28f33f4618fa..410b6eae6d02 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c
>>> @@ -297,6 +297,10 @@ static int mp2973_read_word_data(struct i2c_client *client, int page,
>>> int ret;
>>>
>>> switch (reg) {
>>> + case PMBUS_STATUS_WORD:
>>> + ret = pmbus_read_word_data(client, page, phase, reg);
>>
>> if (ret < 0)
>> return ret;
>>
>> Please add a comment explaining what is going on.
> Sure.
>>
>>> + ret ^= PB_STATUS_POWER_GOOD_N;
>>> + break;
>>> case PMBUS_OT_FAULT_LIMIT:
>>> ret = mp2975_read_word_helper(client, page, phase, reg,
>>> GENMASK(7, 0));
>>>
>>> base-commit: a4bb1ce5b9e3ca403c04e20ebeae77fd6447cb11
>>
On 7/28/23 04:28, Naresh Solanki wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
>
> On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 at 15:30, Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 7/28/23 01:25, Naresh Solanki wrote:
>>> From: Patrick Rudolph <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> MPS returns PGOOD instead of PB_STATUS_POWER_GOOD_N.
>>> Fix that in the read_word_data hook.
>>>
>> Datasheets are not public, so I can not verify, but the code below
>> only handles MP2973 and MP2971. What about MP2975 ?
> I dont have MP2975 to even verify. I'm not sure if its applicable.
>>
>> Either case, this appears to affect most Monolithic chips, but
>> not all of them. Please limit the statement to known to be affected
>> chips.
> Yes. With what we observed, this affects mp2973 & mp2971.
> Will update accordingly.
Please also add a comment that MP2975 is likely affected but can not be
confirmed due to lack of a datasheet.
Thanks,
Guenter
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <[email protected]>
>>> Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c | 4 ++++
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c
>>> index 28f33f4618fa..410b6eae6d02 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c
>>> @@ -297,6 +297,10 @@ static int mp2973_read_word_data(struct i2c_client *client, int page,
>>> int ret;
>>>
>>> switch (reg) {
>>> + case PMBUS_STATUS_WORD:
>>> + ret = pmbus_read_word_data(client, page, phase, reg);
>>
>> if (ret < 0)
>> return ret;
>>
>> Please add a comment explaining what is going on.
> Sure.
>>
>>> + ret ^= PB_STATUS_POWER_GOOD_N;
>>> + break;
>>> case PMBUS_OT_FAULT_LIMIT:
>>> ret = mp2975_read_word_helper(client, page, phase, reg,
>>> GENMASK(7, 0));
>>>
>>> base-commit: a4bb1ce5b9e3ca403c04e20ebeae77fd6447cb11
>>
Hi
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 at 19:56, Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 7/28/23 04:28, Naresh Solanki wrote:
> > Hi Guenter,
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 at 15:30, Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 7/28/23 01:25, Naresh Solanki wrote:
> >>> From: Patrick Rudolph <[email protected]>
> >>>
> >>> MPS returns PGOOD instead of PB_STATUS_POWER_GOOD_N.
> >>> Fix that in the read_word_data hook.
> >>>
> >> Datasheets are not public, so I can not verify, but the code below
> >> only handles MP2973 and MP2971. What about MP2975 ?
> > I dont have MP2975 to even verify. I'm not sure if its applicable.
> >>
> >> Either case, this appears to affect most Monolithic chips, but
> >> not all of them. Please limit the statement to known to be affected
> >> chips.
> > Yes. With what we observed, this affects mp2973 & mp2971.
> > Will update accordingly.
>
> Please also add a comment that MP2975 is likely affected but can not be
> confirmed due to lack of a datasheet.
I have the datasheet for MP2975 but haven't verified it on real HW.
Regards,
Naresh
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
>
> >>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <[email protected]>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <[email protected]>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c | 4 ++++
> >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c
> >>> index 28f33f4618fa..410b6eae6d02 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/mp2975.c
> >>> @@ -297,6 +297,10 @@ static int mp2973_read_word_data(struct i2c_client *client, int page,
> >>> int ret;
> >>>
> >>> switch (reg) {
> >>> + case PMBUS_STATUS_WORD:
> >>> + ret = pmbus_read_word_data(client, page, phase, reg);
> >>
> >> if (ret < 0)
> >> return ret;
> >>
> >> Please add a comment explaining what is going on.
> > Sure.
> >>
> >>> + ret ^= PB_STATUS_POWER_GOOD_N;
> >>> + break;
> >>> case PMBUS_OT_FAULT_LIMIT:
> >>> ret = mp2975_read_word_helper(client, page, phase, reg,
> >>> GENMASK(7, 0));
> >>>
> >>> base-commit: a4bb1ce5b9e3ca403c04e20ebeae77fd6447cb11
> >>
>