> The of_drm_find_bridge() function returns NULL on error, it doesn't return
> error pointers so this check doesn't work.
How do you think about a wording variant like the following?
Change description:
An error pointer check was performed after a call of the
function “of_drm_find_bridge” despite of the detail
that failures are indicated for the bridge search
by null pointers instead.
Thus adjust a check for the failure predicate
and the corresponding exception handling.
Regards,
Markus