Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762670Ab2KBCZZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2012 22:25:25 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:63768 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762589Ab2KBCZW (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2012 22:25:22 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 00:25:08 -0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Borislav Petkov Cc: "Luck, Tony" , Linux Edac Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [RFC EDAC/GHES] edac: lock module owner to avoid error report conflicts Message-ID: <20121102002508.6c0dcfc2@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20121101235457.GA20890@liondog.tnic> References: <048a00fa4a888b349be5954ce9fd063a7bcf2564.1351691230.git.mchehab@redhat.com> <20121101110512.GA31271@liondog.tnic> <20121101094721.2a57719c@redhat.com> <20121101195509.GE31271@liondog.tnic> <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F19D5C13C@ORSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com> <20121101220249.GI31271@liondog.tnic> <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F19D5C22B@ORSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com> <20121101235457.GA20890@liondog.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1880 Lines: 48 Em Fri, 2 Nov 2012 00:54:57 +0100 Borislav Petkov escreveu: > On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 11:47:52PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote: > > > Right, but at least in the csrow case, we still can compute back the > > > csrow even with the interleaving, after we know how it is done exactly > > > (on which address bits, etc). I think this should be doable on Intel > > > controllers too but I don't know. > > > > No. Architecturally all Intel provides is the physical address in MCi_ADDR. > > To do anything with that you are into per-system space, and the > > registers that define the mappings are not necessarily available > > to OS code ... sometimes they are, and sometimes they are even > > documented in places where Mauro can use them to write an > > EDAC driver ... but there are no guarantees. > > One more reason that we need some sort of tables telling us which > rank/csrow maps to which DIMM and thus silkscreen label so that we can > be able to say the following from software: If you take a look at sb_edac driver, you'll see that most of the driver's logic is the part that do address->DIMM location mapping. It is a very complex logic. > > "You just had a single corrected ECC error in the DIMM with label > P0_DIMM_A" Converting from a DIMM location into a DIMM label is trivial, through: just a simple table lookup. As APEI/GHES seem to provide the DIMM location, a simple table lookup should also work there, as I said before. > or whatever unique naming each platform vendor comes up with. > > The day hw people give me this, I'm going to throw a big party and > invite all LKML. > -- Regards, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/