Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 16:24:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 16:24:05 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust128.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.128]:7414 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 16:24:04 -0400 Subject: Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000 From: Alan Cox To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: "David S. Miller" , gh@us.ibm.com, hadi@cyberus.ca, tcw@tempest.prismnet.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, niv@us.ibm.com In-Reply-To: <61930391.1031313088@[10.10.2.3]> References: <20020906.113611.102227888.davem@redhat.com> <61930391.1031313088@[10.10.2.3]> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-6) Date: 06 Sep 2002 21:29:25 +0100 Message-Id: <1031344165.10612.79.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 682 Lines: 15 On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 19:51, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > The secondary point is "what are customers doing in the field?" > (not what *should* they be doing ;-)). Moreover, I think the > Apache + Tux combination has been fairly well beaten on already > by other people in the past, though I'm sure it could be done > again. Tux has been proven in the field. A glance at some of the interesting porn domain names using it would show that 8) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/