Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756100Ab2KBKoR (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Nov 2012 06:44:17 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:28287 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755185Ab2KBKoP (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Nov 2012 06:44:15 -0400 Message-ID: <5093A3F4.8090108@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:44:04 +0100 From: Zdenek Kabelac Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121016 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mel Gorman CC: Jiri Slaby , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Jiri Slaby , linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: kswapd0: excessive CPU usage References: <507688CC.9000104@suse.cz> <106695.1349963080@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <5076E700.2030909@suse.cz> <118079.1349978211@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <50770905.5070904@suse.cz> <119175.1349979570@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <5077434D.7080008@suse.cz> <50780F26.7070007@suse.cz> <20121012135726.GY29125@suse.de> <507BDD45.1070705@suse.cz> <20121015110937.GE29125@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20121015110937.GE29125@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4533 Lines: 104 Dne 15.10.2012 13:09, Mel Gorman napsal(a): > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:54:13AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> On 10/12/2012 03:57 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: >>> mm: vmscan: scale number of pages reclaimed by reclaim/compaction only in direct reclaim >>> >>> Jiri Slaby reported the following: >>> >>> (It's an effective revert of "mm: vmscan: scale number of pages >>> reclaimed by reclaim/compaction based on failures".) >>> Given kswapd had hours of runtime in ps/top output yesterday in the >>> morning and after the revert it's now 2 minutes in sum for the last 24h, >>> I would say, it's gone. >>> >>> The intention of the patch in question was to compensate for the loss of >>> lumpy reclaim. Part of the reason lumpy reclaim worked is because it >>> aggressively reclaimed pages and this patch was meant to be a >>> sane compromise. >>> >>> When compaction fails, it gets deferred and both compaction and >>> reclaim/compaction is deferred avoid excessive reclaim. However, since >>> commit c6543459 (mm: remove __GFP_NO_KSWAPD), kswapd is woken up each time >>> and continues reclaiming which was not taken into account when the patch >>> was developed. >>> >>> As it is not taking deferred compaction into account in this path it scans >>> aggressively before falling out and making the compaction_deferred check in >>> compaction_ready. This patch avoids kswapd scaling pages for reclaim and >>> leaves the aggressive reclaim to the process attempting the THP >>> allocation. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman >>> --- >>> mm/vmscan.c | 10 ++++++++-- >>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c >>> index 2624edc..2b7edfa 100644 >>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c >>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c >>> @@ -1763,14 +1763,20 @@ static bool in_reclaim_compaction(struct scan_control *sc) >>> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPACTION >>> /* >>> * If compaction is deferred for sc->order then scale the number of pages >>> - * reclaimed based on the number of consecutive allocation failures >>> + * reclaimed based on the number of consecutive allocation failures. This >>> + * scaling only happens for direct reclaim as it is about to attempt >>> + * compaction. If compaction fails, future allocations will be deferred >>> + * and reclaim avoided. On the other hand, kswapd does not take compaction >>> + * deferral into account so if it scaled, it could scan excessively even >>> + * though allocations are temporarily not being attempted. >>> */ >>> static unsigned long scale_for_compaction(unsigned long pages_for_compaction, >>> struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc) >>> { >>> struct zone *zone = lruvec_zone(lruvec); >>> >>> - if (zone->compact_order_failed <= sc->order) >>> + if (zone->compact_order_failed <= sc->order && >>> + !current_is_kswapd()) >>> pages_for_compaction <<= zone->compact_defer_shift; >>> return pages_for_compaction; >>> } >> >> Yes, applying this instead of the revert fixes the issue as well. >> > I've applied this patch on 3.7.0-rc3 kernel - and I still see excessive CPU usage - mainly after suspend/resume Here is just simple kswapd backtrace from running kernel: kswapd0 R running task 0 30 2 0x00000000 ffff8801331ddae8 0000000000000082 ffff880135b8a340 0000000000000008 ffff880135b8a340 ffff8801331ddfd8 ffff8801331ddfd8 ffff8801331ddfd8 ffff880071db8000 ffff880135b8a340 0000000000000286 ffff8801331dc000 Call Trace: [] preempt_schedule+0x42/0x60 [] _raw_spin_unlock+0x55/0x60 [] put_super+0x31/0x40 [] drop_super+0x22/0x30 [] prune_super+0x149/0x1b0 [] shrink_slab+0xba/0x510 [] ? mem_cgroup_iter+0x17a/0x2e0 [] ? mem_cgroup_iter+0xca/0x2e0 [] balance_pgdat+0x629/0x7f0 [] kswapd+0x174/0x620 [] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x60/0x60 [] ? balance_pgdat+0x7f0/0x7f0 [] kthread+0xdb/0xe0 [] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x140/0x140 [] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x140/0x140 Zdenek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/