Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 22:02:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 22:02:05 -0500 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:41228 "EHLO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 22:01:58 -0500 Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 22:38:04 -0200 (BRST) From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Andreas Dilger cc: Chris Mason , "Stephen C. Tweedie" , Alexander Viro , Linus Torvalds , Russell Cattelan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block error) In-Reply-To: <200012220220.eBM2Kpj19962@webber.adilger.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Andreas Dilger wrote: > Marcelo Tosatti writes: > > It seems your code has a problem with bh flush time. > > > > In flush_dirty_buffers(), a buffer may (if being called from kupdate) only > > be written in case its old enough. (bh->b_flushtime) > > > > If the flush happens for an anonymous buffer, you'll end up writing all > > buffers which are sitting on the same page (with block_write_anon_page), > > but these other buffers are not necessarily old enough to be flushed. > > This isn't really a "problem" however. The page is the _maximum_ age of > the buffer before it needs to be written. If we can efficiently write it > out with another buffer > (essentially for free if they are on the same spot on disk) Are you sure this is true for buffer pages in most cases? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/