Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755828Ab2KCLEJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Nov 2012 07:04:09 -0400 Received: from mail-oa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.219.46]:43997 "EHLO mail-oa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751760Ab2KCLEG (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Nov 2012 07:04:06 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20121030122032.GC3888@suse.de> References: <20121025121617.617683848@chello.nl> <20121030122032.GC3888@suse.de> Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 19:04:04 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/31] numa/core patches From: Alex Shi To: Mel Gorman Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Rik van Riel , Andrea Arcangeli , Johannes Weiner , Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Ingo Molnar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1328 Lines: 26 > > In reality, this report is larger but I chopped it down a bit for > brevity. autonuma beats schednuma *heavily* on this benchmark both in > terms of average operations per numa node and overall throughput. > > SPECJBB PEAKS > 3.7.0 3.7.0 3.7.0 > rc2-stats-v2r1 rc2-autonuma-v27r8 rc2-schednuma-v1r3 > Expctd Warehouse 12.00 ( 0.00%) 12.00 ( 0.00%) 12.00 ( 0.00%) > Expctd Peak Bops 442225.00 ( 0.00%) 596039.00 ( 34.78%) 555342.00 ( 25.58%) > Actual Warehouse 7.00 ( 0.00%) 9.00 ( 28.57%) 8.00 ( 14.29%) > Actual Peak Bops 550747.00 ( 0.00%) 646124.00 ( 17.32%) 560635.00 ( 1.80%) It is impressive report! Could you like to share the what JVM and options are you using in the testing, and based on which kinds of platform? -- Thanks Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/