Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751727Ab2KDJUe (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Nov 2012 04:20:34 -0500 Received: from smtp.getmail.no ([84.208.15.66]:49203 "EHLO smtp.getmail.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750715Ab2KDJUb (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Nov 2012 04:20:31 -0500 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes In-reply-to: References: <1349923594.6989.19.camel@marge.simpson.net> Subject: Re: Scheduler queues for less os-jitter? To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, efault@gmx.de Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 10:20:29 +0100 From: Uwaysi Bin Kareem Message-id: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.02 (Linux) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 644 Lines: 14 Ok, anyway realtime processes did not work quite as expected. ("overloaded" machine, even though cpu-time is only 10%). So I guess I have to enable cgroups and live with the overhead then. If I set cpu-limits there, does that involve an absolute value, or is it normalized, so that even if I do 0.001% cpu for processes, they get all cpu, when there is nothing running? Peace Be With You. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/