Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932319Ab2KEN0i (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2012 08:26:38 -0500 Received: from li42-95.members.linode.com ([209.123.162.95]:40018 "EHLO li42-95.members.linode.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754215Ab2KEN0g convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2012 08:26:36 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] capebus moving omap_devices to mach-omap2 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Pantelis Antoniou In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 14:25:33 +0100 Cc: "Cousson, Benoit" , Koen Kooi , Felipe Balbi , Tony Lindgren , linux-kernel , Matt Porter , Russ Dill , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Kevin Hilman , Paul Walmsley , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Rob Herring Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: References: <1351783082-11411-1-git-send-email-panto@antoniou-consulting.com> <20121031175219.GH12739@atomide.com> <20121031180935.GL12739@atomide.com> <50918223.6080003@ti.com> <8AD2F7AF-8315-442B-A394-1A38DAB29F52@antoniou-consulting.com> <20121031212639.GQ12739@atomide.com> <8B058B00-6C21-4410-A24B-75651D49F6EC@antoniou-consulting.com> <20121031221402.GA29490@arwen.pp.htv.fi> <50924DA3.1060901@ti.com> <50925C49.7060004@ti.com> <50938108.5040507@ti.com> <40797D3D-D62C-4E15-B0DF-75636C1637EE@antoniou-consulting.com> To: Grant Likely X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1105 Lines: 32 On Nov 5, 2012, at 1:22 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Pantelis Antoniou > wrote: >> Assuming that we do work on a DT object format, and that the runtime resolution mechanism is approved, >> then I agree that this part of the capebus patches can be dropped and the functionality assumed by generic >> DT core. >> >> The question is that this will take time, with no guarantees that this would be acceptable from >> the device tree maintainers. So I am putting them in the CC list, to see what they think about it. > > This is actually exactly the direction I want to go with DT, which the > ability to load supplemental DT data blobs from either a kernel module > or userspace using the firmware loading infrastructure. > > g. Hi Grant, That's pretty much our use case. Regards -- Pantelis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/