Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 16:01:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 16:01:06 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:43959 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 16:01:06 -0400 Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 13:03:34 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Andrew Morton Cc: Paolo Ciarrocchi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: LMbench2.0 results Message-ID: <20020907200334.GI888@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Andrew Morton , Paolo Ciarrocchi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20020907121854.10290.qmail@linuxmail.org> <3D7A2768.E5C85EB@digeo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: brief message Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D7A2768.E5C85EB@digeo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 767 Lines: 22 Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote: >> Hi all, >> I've just ran lmbench2.0 on my laptop. >> Here the results (again, 2.5.33 seems to be "slow", I don't know why...) On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 09:20:56AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > The fork/exec/mmap slowdown is the rmap overhead. I have some stuff > which partialy improves it. Hmm, Where does it enter the mmap() path? PTE instantiation is only done for the VM_LOCKED case IIRC. Otherwise it should be invisible. Perhaps testing with overcommit on would be useful. Cheers, Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/