Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 18:54:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 18:54:03 -0400 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:51600 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 18:54:02 -0400 Message-ID: <3D7A87F1.F3D0865C@digeo.com> Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2002 16:12:49 -0700 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.5.33 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: William Lee Irwin III CC: Paolo Ciarrocchi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: LMbench2.0 results References: <20020907121854.10290.qmail@linuxmail.org> <3D7A2768.E5C85EB@digeo.com> <20020907200334.GI888@holomorphy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Sep 2002 22:58:37.0005 (UTC) FILETIME=[196D8FD0:01C256C2] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 966 Lines: 25 William Lee Irwin III wrote: > > Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> I've just ran lmbench2.0 on my laptop. > >> Here the results (again, 2.5.33 seems to be "slow", I don't know why...) > > On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 09:20:56AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > The fork/exec/mmap slowdown is the rmap overhead. I have some stuff > > which partialy improves it. > > Hmm, Where does it enter the mmap() path? PTE instantiation is only done > for the VM_LOCKED case IIRC. Otherwise it should be invisible. Oh, is that just the mmap() call itself? > Perhaps testing with overcommit on would be useful. Well yes - the new overcommit code was a significant hit on the 16ways was it not? You have some numbers on that? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/