Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 19:43:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 19:43:11 -0400 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.129]:53428 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 19:43:11 -0400 Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2002 16:44:27 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Andrew Morton , William Lee Irwin III cc: Paolo Ciarrocchi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: LMbench2.0 results Message-ID: <2090000.1031442267@flay> In-Reply-To: <3D7A87F1.F3D0865C@digeo.com> References: <20020907121854.10290.qmail@linuxmail.org> <3D7A2768.E5C85EB@digeo.com> <20020907200334.GI888@holomorphy.com> <3D7A87F1.F3D0865C@digeo.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 477 Lines: 14 >> Perhaps testing with overcommit on would be useful. > > Well yes - the new overcommit code was a significant hit on the 16ways > was it not? You have some numbers on that? About 20% hit on system time for kernel compiles. M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/