Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 8 Sep 2002 06:29:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 8 Sep 2002 06:29:55 -0400 Received: from netfinity.realnet.co.sz ([196.28.7.2]:6802 "HELO netfinity.realnet.co.sz") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 8 Sep 2002 06:29:55 -0400 Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 12:57:48 +0200 (SAST) From: Zwane Mwaikambo X-X-Sender: zwane@linux-box.realnet.co.sz To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Robert Love , Linux Kernel , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] per isr in_progress markers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 866 Lines: 21 On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Ingo Molnar wrote: > hm, perhaps it could confuse some of the more complex shared-IRQ-aware > device drivers, such as IDE. But your patch is very tempting nevertheless, > it removes much of the disadvantage of sharing interrupt lines. Most of > the handlers on the chain are supposed to be completely independent. iirc IDE is capable of doing its own masking per device(nIEN) and in fact does even do unconditional sti's in its isr paths. So i would think it would be one of the not so painful device drivers to take care of. DISCLAIMER: I am not Andre Hedrick Zwane -- function.linuxpower.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/