Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 8 Sep 2002 10:05:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 8 Sep 2002 10:05:09 -0400 Received: from cibs9.sns.it ([192.167.206.29]:8971 "EHLO cibs9.sns.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 8 Sep 2002 10:05:07 -0400 Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 16:09:24 +0200 (CEST) From: venom@sns.it To: Pavel Machek cc: Paolo Ciarrocchi , , Subject: Re: side-by-side Re: BYTE Unix Benchmarks Version 3.6 In-Reply-To: <20020906102849.A35@toy.ucw.cz> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1152 Lines: 32 On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Pavel Machek wrote: > Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 10:28:50 +0000 > From: Pavel Machek > To: Paolo Ciarrocchi > Cc: venom@sns.it, ahu@ds9a.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: side-by-side Re: BYTE Unix Benchmarks Version 3.6 > > Hi! > > > > I usually run byte bench regularly with every new kernel, so I see some > > > strange results here. > > > > > > From your numbers, I would say you are using a PIII 600/900 Mhz (more or > > > less). It is not an AMD AThlon or a PIV, since float and double are too > > > slow, not it is a K6 because they are too fast. > > Yes, I ran the test on a HP Omnibook 600 (PIII@900) > > APM or ACPI? How did you guarantee not going powersave? > I suppose Paolo disabled power saving both from bios and from kernel, of course. If not, then the differences I noticed could be explained easilly, Thanx Luigi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/