Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752143Ab2KFNzM (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2012 08:55:12 -0500 Received: from li42-95.members.linode.com ([209.123.162.95]:47282 "EHLO li42-95.members.linode.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751898Ab2KFNzJ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2012 08:55:09 -0500 References: <50924DA3.1060901@ti.com> <20121101124025.GA12489@arwen.pp.htv.fi> <20121101131609.GC12489@arwen.pp.htv.fi> <20121101135148.382aec00@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> <9F25E89E-9194-4725-8A8C-053DCBADA1DB@antoniou-consulting.com> <20121101220518.GE14982@arwen.pp.htv.fi> <20121102112104.4657fb7b@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> <0EC43413-1DD7-4E2A-879B-0B5B926FFDFE@antoniou-consulting.com> <18667A4E-5513-4D74-922F-30D091609F16@antoniou-consulting.com> <4DA29B25-C056-4360-8768-05585485FE00@antoniou-consulting.com> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Message-Id: Cc: Joel A Fernandes , Alan Cox , Russ Dill , Felipe Balbi , Benoit Cousson , Tony Lindgren , linux-kernel , Koen Kooi , Matt Porter , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , Kevin Hilman , Paul Walmsley , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , Rob Herring X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10A523) From: Pantelis Antoniou Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] capebus moving omap_devices to mach-omap2 Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 14:54:59 +0100 To: Grant Likely Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1203 Lines: 34 Από το iPhone μου 6 Νοε 2012, 12:16, ο/η Grant Likely έγραψε: > On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Pantelis Antoniou > wrote: >> On Nov 6, 2012, at 4:06 AM, Joel A Fernandes wrote: >>> Sure, so if we add data type supplementary properties to the tree to >>> indicate the data type as "indirect phandle", then kernel could refer >>> to the index in the got-like table to fetch the actual phandle address >>> (1-level of indirection), instead of directly using the address in the >>> data field. >> >> I'm fine with this. > > But if the data about phandles is already in the tree, then the need > for a GOT simply goes away. The phandles can be fixed up directly and > it is so much better because it works with existing parsing code after > the merge is applied. > Either way works. It is your call after all. I agree that your method is simpler. > g. Regards -- Pantelis-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/