Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752510Ab2KFTvJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2012 14:51:09 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:38388 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751300Ab2KFTvH (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2012 14:51:07 -0500 Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 11:51:05 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Alex Shi Cc: rob@landley.net, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, arjan@linux.intel.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, andre.przywara@amd.com, rjw@sisk.pl, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cl@linux.com, pjt@google.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] sched: power aware load balance, Message-Id: <20121106115105.4ba6ab32.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1352207399-29497-3-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> References: <1352207399-29497-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> <1352207399-29497-3-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1314 Lines: 37 On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 21:09:58 +0800 Alex Shi wrote: > $for ((i=0; i < I; i++)) ; do while true; do : ; done & done > > Checking the power consuming with a powermeter on the NHM EP. > powersaving performance > I = 2 148w 160w > I = 4 175w 181w > I = 8 207w 224w > I = 16 324w 324w > > On a SNB laptop(4 cores *HT) > powersaving performance > I = 2 28w 35w > I = 4 38w 52w > I = 6 44w 54w > I = 8 56w 56w > > On the SNB EP machine, when I = 16, power saved more than 100 Watts. Confused. According to the above table, at I=16 the EP machine saved 0 watts. Typo in the data? Also, that's a pretty narrow test - it's doing fork and exec at very high frequency and things such as task placement decisions at process startup might be affecting the results. Also, the load will be quite kernel-intensive, as opposed to the more typical userspace-intensive loads. So, please run a broader set of tests so we can see the effects? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/