Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 8 Sep 2002 14:05:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 8 Sep 2002 14:05:06 -0400 Received: from [63.209.4.196] ([63.209.4.196]:5901 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 8 Sep 2002 14:05:05 -0400 Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 11:09:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: James Morris cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Performance issue in 2.5.32+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1220 Lines: 30 On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, James Morris wrote: > > I guess it could be an existing hardware problem which has been triggered > by some innocuous change. Does HZ make any difference to you? That's easily tested by just editing include/asm-i386/param.h and changing HZ to 100 to get the old behaviour.. I think that change happened earlier than your performance problem, but since lmbench variations can be noticeable and you only had one run per kernel, it might be one of those "comes and goes" things.. Another thing that you might check out is to disable USB if you have it on. The memory throughput issue makes me wonder whether there might be a lot of DMA going on, and USB (by "design", and I use the term losely) has this silly "DMA always" approach, even if nothing really is happening on the bus. I don't really see anythign very suspicious in the 31->32 changelogs. Somebody else already mentioned TLS etc, but that shouldn't really be noticeable... Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/