Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753854Ab2KFXcP (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2012 18:32:15 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:40064 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751947Ab2KFXcO (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2012 18:32:14 -0500 Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 15:32:13 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Minchan Kim Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Dan Magenheimer , Nitin Gupta , Seth Jennings , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Jens Axboe , Pekka Enberg , gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] zram/zsmalloc promotion Message-Id: <20121106153213.03e9cc9f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1351840367-4152-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> References: <1351840367-4152-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 676 Lines: 20 On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 16:12:44 +0900 Minchan Kim wrote: > This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging. The changelogs are distressingly short of *reasons* for doing this! > Both are very clean and zram have been used by many embedded product > for a long time. Well that's interesting. Which embedded products? How are they using zram and what benefit are they observing from it, in what scenarios? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/