Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751364Ab2KGGMI (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2012 01:12:08 -0500 Received: from mail-ea0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:61714 "EHLO mail-ea0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751031Ab2KGGMG (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2012 01:12:06 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 11:42:04 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: possibility of parent clock selection through DT From: Shiraz Hashim To: Mike Turquette , Rob Herring Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, spear-devel , Viresh Kumar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 611 Lines: 19 Hi Mike, Rob, Devices in a SoC can have multiple possible clock sources which is perfectly captured through clk framework. But the device itself may not be aware of the complex hierarchy above it. In this case how do you suggest a board (through DT) should select its preference. Is there some work already going on in this direction ? -- regards Shiraz Hashim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/