Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754728Ab2KGL2P (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2012 06:28:15 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:41115 "EHLO mail-ee0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754101Ab2KGL2O (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2012 06:28:14 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20121107112136.GA31715@shutemov.name> References: <20121107105348.GA25549@lizard> <20121107112136.GA31715@shutemov.name> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 13:28:12 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 865x4L21GRXIzL-zV97O3t5rgjc Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC v3 0/3] vmpressure_fd: Linux VM pressure notifications From: Pekka Enberg To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Anton Vorontsov , Mel Gorman , Leonid Moiseichuk , KOSAKI Motohiro , Minchan Kim , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , John Stultz , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, kernel-team@android.com, linux-man@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 738 Lines: 15 On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: >> While the new API is very simple, it is still extensible (i.e. versioned). > > Sorry, I didn't follow previous discussion on this, but could you > explain what's wrong with memory notifications from memcg? > As I can see you can get pretty similar functionality using memory > thresholds on the root cgroup. What's the point? Why should you be required to use cgroups to get VM pressure events to userspace? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/