Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 06:10:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 06:10:28 -0400 Received: from ns.commfireservices.com ([216.6.9.162]:30482 "HELO hemi.commfireservices.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 06:09:56 -0400 From: zwane@mwaikambo.name Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] per isr in_progress markers To: bert hubert Cc: Linux Kernel X-Originating-IP: 196.28.7.236 X-Mailer: Webmin 0.940 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bound1031566421" Message-Id: <20020909101341.2E3B2BC51@hemi.commfireservices.com> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 06:13:41 -0400 (EDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1009 Lines: 26 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --bound1031566421 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit bert hubert wrote .. > On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 03:01:02PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > setups (as opposed to most laptops, which often seem to put every PCI > > device on the same irq) > > I've always thought that this was a linux problem - any reason *why* laptops > do this? Hi Bert, I'd presume the reason for that would be because the irq/pin mappings end up in a manner that all the devices end up having the same irq assigned to the pin they're using. This would be a BIOS/fw problem, although it can be alleviated with PCI IRQ router support for that particular chipset. Zwane --bound1031566421-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/