Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 06:41:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 06:41:21 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.18.111]:39943 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 06:41:20 -0400 Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 12:46:04 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Paolo Ciarrocchi Cc: venom@sns.it, ahu@ds9a.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: side-by-side Re: BYTE Unix Benchmarks Version 3.6 Message-ID: <20020909104604.GA26989@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> References: <20020908225645.21341.qmail@linuxmail.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020908225645.21341.qmail@linuxmail.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1077 Lines: 28 Hi! > > > APM, and I pressed the shift key every few minutes, > > > therefore no powersafe. > > > > That still means APM bios calls when idle, right? > > Yes, you are rigth. > But again, with Byte Unix version 4.1 I got much > more intersting result with no "strange" numbers, > I tried that test few hours ago,. > I know I can disable APM from both the kernel and the BIOS but I'd > > > like to test the kernel I use in "daily" usage. What do you > > > think about it? Do you suggest me to use a different > > > configuration when I run the test? Disable power managment. What you are doing is test of power managment subsystem, I believe; that's okay but you did not label it as such. Pavel -- Casualities in World Trade Center: ~3k dead inside the building, cryptography in U.S.A. and free speech in Czech Republic. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/