Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751376Ab2KIF2q (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2012 00:28:46 -0500 Received: from e28smtp08.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.8]:44150 "EHLO e28smtp08.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750699Ab2KIF2n (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2012 00:28:43 -0500 Message-ID: <509C947F.2000007@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 13:28:31 +0800 From: Michael Wang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fengguang Wu CC: "Paul E. McKenney" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , LKML Subject: Re: WARNING: at kernel/rcutree.c:1562 rcu_do_batch() References: <20121109042330.GA16556@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20121109042330.GA16556@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit x-cbid: 12110905-2000-0000-0000-000009CE2CE3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3430 Lines: 75 Hi, Fengguang On 11/09/2012 12:23 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote: > Paul, > > I got the below warning in stable kernel 3.6.3. linux-next does > not have this issue. Bisect shows that the first bad commit is Please allow me to ask few questions: 1. is it 100% sure that linux-next don't show this issue on same hardware? 2. is it 100% sure that when removed commit b1420f1, both WARN in rcu_do_batch() and __call_rcu() disappeared? The reason I asked the questions is that this issue looks really similar to the one we faced previously: The interrupt come in after cpu has been offline. I suppose this is caused by apic issue and no matter with the rcu before, so I really want to figure out whether it is very related with commit b1420f1? Regards, Michael Wang > > commit b1420f1c8bfc30ecf6380a31d0f686884834b599 > Author: Paul E. McKenney > Date: Thu Mar 1 13:18:08 2012 -0800 > > rcu: Make rcu_barrier() less disruptive > > > [ 92.252733] do_IRQ: 1.59 No irq handler for vector (irq -1) > [ 92.253257] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 92.253675] WARNING: at /c/kernel-tests/src/stable/kernel/rcutree.c:1562 rcu_do_batch+0x17e/0x63b() > [ 92.254474] Hardware name: Bochs > [ 92.254766] Modules linked in: > [ 92.256689] Pid: 9, comm: migration/1 Not tainted 3.6.3 #1306 > [ 92.256689] Call Trace: > [ 92.256689] [] warn_slowpath_common+0x83/0x9c > [ 92.256689] [] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c > [ 92.256689] [] rcu_do_batch+0x17e/0x63b > [ 92.256689] [] ? rcu_report_qs_rnp+0x28b/0x2d5 > [ 92.256689] [] ? rcu_process_callbacks+0xe3/0x236 > [ 92.256689] [] rcu_process_callbacks+0x172/0x236 > [ 92.256689] [] __do_softirq+0xf6/0x231 > [ 92.256689] [] ? tick_program_event+0x24/0x26 > [ 92.256689] [] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 > [ 92.256689] [] do_softirq+0x4a/0xa6 > [ 92.256689] [] irq_exit+0x51/0xbc > [ 92.256689] [] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x8b/0x99 > [ 92.256689] [] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6f/0x80 > [ 92.256689] [] ? local_clock+0x1d/0x5a > [ 92.256689] [] ? stop_machine_cpu_stop+0x104/0x119 > [ 92.256689] [] cpu_stopper_thread+0xdd/0x17d > [ 92.256689] [] ? queue_stop_cpus_work+0x130/0x130 > [ 92.256689] [] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x47/0x65 > [ 92.256689] [] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x125/0x181 > [ 92.256689] [] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf > [ 92.256689] [] ? cpu_stop_signal_done+0x2c/0x2c > [ 92.256689] [] kthread+0x9a/0xa2 > [ 92.256689] [] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 > [ 92.256689] [] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13 > [ 92.256689] [] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x5a/0x5a > [ 92.317029] [] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13 > > Thanks, > Fengguang > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/