Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 09:32:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 09:32:54 -0400 Received: from 2-210.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.193.160.210]:46496 "EHLO 2-210.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 09:32:53 -0400 Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 10:37:11 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Daniel Phillips cc: Andrew Morton , Paolo Ciarrocchi , Subject: Re: LMbench2.0 results In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 831 Lines: 24 On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote: > I suspect the overall performance loss on the laptop has more to do with > several months of focussing exclusively on the needs of 4-way and higher > smp machines. Probably true, we're pulling off an indecent number of tricks for 4-way and 8-way SMP performance. This overhead shouldn't be too bad on UP and 2-way machines, but might easily be a percent or so. Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Spamtraps of the month: september@surriel.com trac@trac.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/