Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 10:14:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 10:14:40 -0400 Received: from cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net ([24.221.152.185]:64646 "EHLO Bill-The-Cat.bloom.county") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 10:14:40 -0400 Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 07:18:50 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Wojciech Sas Cieciwa Cc: linux-kernel , mingo@elte.hu Subject: Re: [long] 2.4.19 and O(1) Scheduler [PPC] Message-ID: <20020909141850.GB3836@opus.bloom.county> References: <20020906142644.GR761@opus.bloom.county> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1144 Lines: 26 On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 12:30:08PM +0200, Wojciech Sas Cieciwa wrote: > On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Tom Rini wrote: > [...] > > > > You've got some incomplete PPC patch somewhere, or you're trying to > > compile for an IBM 40x board, which isn't supported by the kernel.org > > trees yet. > > Maybe, patch is from http://people.redhat.com/mingo/O(1)-scheduler/ > When I replace PPC405_ERR77(x, y) to dcbt x,y [I found this in 2.5] > This part passed correctly, but I found next error in O(1) scheduler source. Well, if you aren't compiling for an IBM 40x board, PPC405_ERR77 should be defined to nothing. And it also looks like the O(1) scheduler patch you're trying lacks complete PPC support. I would again suggest that you use 2.4.18 or 2.4.19 and whichever O(1) patch applies to that, as I think I've seen people using O(1) on PPC under 2.4. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/